Ways to Say "Should"
There is good reason to believe that moral entities do not exist objectively, because it is a matter of empirical fact that people disagree about them in a way that they do not disagree about physical reality.
exploring ideas, igniting minds
Get the email newsletter and unlock access to members-only content and updates
Processing your application
Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription
There was an error sending the email
How to Become an Official Enemy of the Professional Academic State. The Timeline of the Sartwell Case, and What It All Means
The New Prison of Language: Some Words in English Against the Oppression of Mandatory English in Professional Philosophy.
A Night on the Town
Capturing Mood — the Value of Mood Stories
Self After Death
In Defense of Panpsychism
See what we’ve written lately
Evolution: Faster and More Complex
Recent studies increase our understanding of the complexities and the speed of evolution.
Sentient Beings
Initially we can say that a sentient being is one that is alive and is conscious of its environment. This definition excludes robots and other machines that detect changes in their environment and respond to them but, we assume, are not conscious. But what is it to be conscious?
Dignity
Birds
Evolution Applies to Religion
Rarely Difficult for the Average Man, yet...
Members
A Culture on Crutches and Living a Life Worth Living... From the Urgent priority to 'a priori'...
Concrete Materialist?
Agreed!
Hopium Defiance Defined
Take a Stand
Wise Wisdom
Schism, Drift, and the Long Winter of Islam
The Role of Tragedy in Moral Education: Cultivating Empathy and Compassion
Letter from a Linguist
A Finely Tuned Universe
21st-Century Enchantments
Distributive Social Justice
Tube Dream
Fish
Towards a TOE – Explaining Quantum Physics, Consciousness and Free Will
"What Kind of Boot?" asked the Buddha
Paid-members
Descartes — 3.2 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Dante — 8.9 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Virgil — 3.7 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean — Bang on!
Remnants of truth, without the PC-ness
Realignment in a Forward Direction
Y-Urn-ING for Aesthetics
Paid-members
Heidegger — 5.3 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Wittgenstein - 3.2 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Kafka — 3.2 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Proust — 2.6 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Hegel — 3.7 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
Paid-members
Shakespeare — 8.9 with a 3.77 S&P Geometric Mean
In case you missed it
Flourishing, Not Just Surviving: Five Questions to Reframe Health and Wholeness
A little Muslim girl and a Christian bus driver. That’s where I want to start.
The most widely published book in human history tells us we are created in the image of God
Royal Priests and Reluctant Pastors: Rethinking Calling in an Age of Church Burnout
