Truth-Seeking Storyteller
A Stacked Vertical Orientation Is What I Observe With a Whole Lot of Physics
Setting: A serene, timeless library filled with books that hover and occasionally rearrange themselves in precise, geometric patterns. Sophia, luminous and calm, sits at a heavy oak table.
Sophia: Welcome, Rudyard and Douglas. I've been observing your perspectives on the world, and I find they create a fascinating vertical structure, like layers of thought—a profound, almost physical arrangement.
Rudyard: The layers you speak of... I've always found the truth of the world is best passed down not in dry lists of dates, but in the shape of a tale—a captivating narrative that takes root in the mind. A chronicle delivered as a story seems to resist the pull of oblivion. It's the most stable orientation for memory, wouldn't you say?
If history were taught in the form of stories, it would never be forgotten.
— Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936)
Sophia: Indeed. A good narrative gives weight and structure to ideas, preventing them from scattering. It's an act of cultural gravity, preserving the insights of the past. But Douglas, you observe the world with a different lens, one that questions the necessity of those invisible layers we sometimes place beneath reality.
Douglas: Exactly. I appreciate the architecture of the observed world—the sheer, stunning beauty of something like a garden. Why must we feel compelled to invent complex, unseen machinations to justify what is already self-evidently magnificent? The elegance of a natural system is often spoiled by the need to populate its foundation with mythical inhabitants. A beautiful phenomenon is its own explanation, isn't it?
Sophia: You both speak of structures and foundations, yet from opposite directions. Rudyard seeks to solidify the foundation of human understanding with rich stories, while Douglas seeks to remove what he sees as superfluous buttressing from the structure of reality. But perhaps, in the grand, vertical stack of existence, both are necessary.
Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?
— Douglas Adams (1952-2001)
Rudyard: The story gives the observation its momentum. Without the drama, the personal connection, the scientific fact, however elegant, becomes inert.
Douglas: And without the clear-eyed, unadorned observation, the story can become an elaborate distraction—a delightful fog that obscures the simple, stark beauty of what is. The poetry is in the physics of the thing, not the poetry about the physics.
Sophia: The true wisdom, then, lies in the interface—where the profound simplicity of the observable world, full of its complex and beautiful physics, meets the profound human need to arrange and remember it through narrative. The stack holds steady only when the clear facts support the engaging story, and the engaging story leads us back to appreciate the clear facts. It's the harmony of the two planes.
Do you find that your own perspective leans more toward the compelling narrative, or the elegant, unadorned observation?
The planksip writer's cooperative is sponsoring a re-writing of this article (1,000 words) with $1,000 CAD in prize money for the best article as voted by your peers in the planksip writer's cooperative. Judged by your peers, your chance to join a community of creative thinkers and win over $750,000 CAD in prize money is your entry point into becoming a planksip journalist.
We want to change the way people engage. The planksip organic platform is dedicated to supporting your voice as a writer and a thought leader. Join today, membership matters!
Daniel Sanderson