To Hoard or Not to Hoard

... it is a deed of greater charity to give a bit of bread to the poor in the time of high prices and famine, than a whole loaf in the time of fertility and abundance ...
— Christine de Pizan (1364-1440)
Old books
If You Are Going To Hoard Anything - Let it Be the planksip Möbius and the Books From Which They Emerge.

If You Are Going To Hoard Anything

To Hoard or Not to Hoard

... it is a deed of greater charity to give a bit of bread to the poor in the time of high prices and famine, than a whole loaf in the time of fertility and abundance ...
— Christine de Pizan (1364-1440)

The titled responsion is "To Hoard or Not to Hoard," which implies an action of sorts, deliberate perhaps, maybe even punitive. Only time will tell.

So what do books, literature, and the wisdom of our ascendants reveal? The reasoning is somewhat circular if left to the hermeneutics. Correlated with future outcomes and foundational for new creative sustainability economies are worth learning about.

In times of uncertainty, whether due to economic instability, natural disasters, or global crises, hoarding becomes a topic of ethical and practical consideration. Throughout history, societies have faced challenges that tested the resilience of individuals and communities. The wisdom passed down from our ascendants often emphasizes the importance of generosity and communal support during times of scarcity. The notion that giving a small portion during hardship is more virtuous than offering abundance in times of plenty suggests an understanding of the asymmetry of need.

Ancient texts and philosophical teachings often echo this sentiment, highlighting the moral duty to share resources when they are most needed. This ethical stance serves as a counterpoint to the instinct to hoard resources for personal security, encouraging individuals to consider the collective well-being of society.

Examining the dynamics of resource distribution in the context of hoarding brings attention to potential consequences for future outcomes. Hoarding during times of abundance may contribute to an unsustainable cycle, as resources are not efficiently allocated to address the broader community's needs. Conversely, sharing during scarcity fosters resilience and cooperation, leading to a more sustainable and equitable society.

As we navigate the challenges of the modern world, sustainable economies have gained prominence. The idea goes beyond environmental sustainability and extends to social and economic dimensions. The wisdom in the quote encourages a mindset shift from individual accumulation to communal well-being—a foundational principle for building new creative sustainability economies.

These emerging economies focus on creating systems that prioritize equitable resource distribution, environmental stewardship, and social responsibility. By learning from past lessons, we can shape a future where hoarding is replaced by collaboration and abundance is shared to address the evolving needs of a global community.

Whether to hoard or not is not merely a matter of personal choice; it reflects broader ethical considerations and has implications for the sustainability of our societies. The wisdom passed down through generations reminds us that true charity lies in sharing during times of need, laying the groundwork for a more resilient and compassionate future. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, embracing the principles of sustainable economies can guide us toward a future where abundance is shared and collective well-being takes precedence over individual accumulation.

Oh, How it Hurts!

To read too many books is harmful.
— Mao Zedong (1893-1976)

The titled responsion implies that the author, that would be me, suffers immensely due to the number of books I have read. I am not bragging; I am just pointing out the ridiculous nature of this dictator's comments — in the first person, to be more precise.

Mao Zedong's statement challenges the conventional wisdom that reading is a beneficial and enriching activity. His assertion suggests a threshold beyond which reading transforms from a source of enlightenment to a potential source of harm. The dictator's dilemma lies in the apparent contradiction between the pursuit of knowledge and the perceived negative consequences associated with an excess of books. By attributing the suffering to the reader, the statement mocks the idea that personal agony results from engaging with too many books. This approach highlights the subjective nature of Mao's perspective and invites readers to question the validity of such a claim.

Mao Zedong, known for his authoritarian rule and strict control over information, paradoxically discouraged excessive reading. His regime was marked by censorship and control of intellectual pursuits, making his disapproval of voracious reading habits ironic. This irony adds a layer of complexity to the statement, suggesting that Mao's aversion to extensive reading may have been rooted in a desire to maintain ideological control rather than a genuine concern for individuals' well-being.

In contrast to Mao's viewpoint, the world has long celebrated the diversity of perspectives found in literature. Reading allows individuals to explore different cultures, histories, and ideas, fostering empathy and understanding. The idea that reading too much could be harmful neglects the inherent richness that diverse voices bring to human knowledge.

While Mao Zedong's assertion may have reflected his particular political agenda, the absurdity of such a perspective becomes apparent from a personal standpoint. In the broader context of human history, the act of reading has been celebrated for its capacity to broaden horizons, deepen understanding, and contribute to the collective wisdom of humanity.

Books — the best antidote against the marsh-gas of boredom and vacuity.
— George Steiner (1929-2020)

The titled responsion is "I Read You Like a Book". What follows is subject to revision. Do you have any suggestions?

This graduated role reversal of humility is an act worth thinking about. Revolutions take place despite our preoccupation with initiation. As the world turns, living is perpetual, limited to our species in language only.

In a world constantly inundated with distractions, pursuing intellectual engagement becomes a sanctuary against the swamp of monotony and emptiness. A renowned intellectual and literary critic, George Steiner, eloquently captured this sentiment by inviting us to contemplate the transformative power of literature in combating the pervasive dullness that can engulf our lives. Moreover, a "graduated role reversal of humility" suggests a nuanced perspective on revolutions and the perpetual nature of existence.

George Steiner's metaphorical description of boredom and vacuity as "marsh-gas" paints a vivid picture of ennui's stifling and toxic nature. He positions books as the antidote, implying that literature has the power to dispel the noxious fumes that arise from a lack of intellectual stimulation. In a world where attention is constantly fragmented, the immersive nature of reading offers a reprieve, allowing individuals to escape the shallowness of routine and discover new dimensions of thought.

Steiner's intriguing phrase, "graduated role reversal of humility," prompts reflection on the evolving dynamics of humility and power. This could be interpreted as a shift from a hierarchical understanding of humility to a more nuanced, graduated perspective. In literature, this may signify an acknowledgment of the humility required to appreciate books' profound insights and diverse perspectives. It encourages readers to embrace a more egalitarian relationship with the wisdom in the pages of literature.

The assertion that "Revolutions take place despite our preoccupation with initiation" challenges the conventional narrative surrounding revolutionary change. Steiner suggests that while we often focus on initiating revolutions, societal transformative shifts may occur organically, propelled by a collective yearning for change. This perspective prompts us to consider the complex interplay of social forces and the unpredictable nature of revolutionary movements.

The notion that literature serves as an antidote against the stagnant marsh-gas of ennui emphasizes the transformative power of intellectual engagement. As we navigate the complexities of existence, the wisdom within books becomes a guiding light, illuminating new pathways of thought and understanding.

Old books
If You Are Going To Hoard Anything - Let it Be the planksip Möbius and the Books From Which They Emerge.

The planksip Writers' Cooperative is proud to sponsor an exciting article rewriting competition where you can win over $750,000 in prize money.

Figures of Speech Collection Personified

Our editorial instructions for your contest submission are simple. The three elements to sacrifice to the muses are; 

  1. Consider all quotes contained within one particular Figure of Speech article.
  2. Consider the corresponding heading (responsion) to the quote.
  3. Consider the featured image with the möbius caption.

What emerges is entirely up to you!

Winners receive $500 per winning entry multiplied by the article's featured quotes. Our largest prize is $8,000 for rewriting the following article;

“I see!” said Homer
A deluded entry into Homer starkly contrasts the battles and hero-worship that united our Western sensibilities and the only psychology that we no? Negation is what I often refer to as differentiation within and through the individual’s drive to individuate.
Share this post