The Unwavering Core: The Necessity of Courage in War

By Benjamin Richmond

In the grim calculus of conflict, where human lives and the fate of nations hang in a precarious balance, one virtue stands not as a mere desirable trait, but as an absolute necessity: courage. Far from being a contingency that might prove useful, courage is the bedrock upon which any meaningful engagement, defense, or even the pursuit of peace can be built. Without it, the grand strategies of generals, the noble ideals of statesmen, and the very will of a people dissolve into chaos and despair. This article explores the inherent requirement for courage in times of war, drawing upon the enduring wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate its multifaceted nature and indispensable role.

The Inescapable Demand: Courage as Necessity, Not Contingency

The idea that courage is optional in war is a dangerous delusion. From the ancient battlefields described by Homer to the strategic treatises of Sun Tzu, the ability to confront fear, pain, and death is presented as a fundamental prerequisite for effective action. Plato, in his dialogue Laches, grapples with the very definition of courage (andreia), recognizing its central importance not only in martial prowess but in all aspects of a virtuous life. Yet, it is in the context of war that its necessity becomes starkest.

Courage in war is not merely the absence of fear, but rather the capacity to act rightly despite fear. It is the mental and moral fortitude that allows individuals to:

  • Endure hardship: Facing privation, injury, and the loss of comrades.
  • Execute commands: Even when they carry immense personal risk.
  • Maintain resolve: In the face of overwhelming odds or setbacks.
  • Protect others: Prioritizing the safety of comrades or civilians over one's own.

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, places courage firmly among the virtues, defining it as a mean between rashness and cowardice. He understands that the truly courageous person acts from a noble motive, not out of ignorance or desperation, and confronts fearful things as reason directs. This philosophical grounding underscores that courage is not a random act but a cultivated disposition, essential for the moral agent in the most extreme circumstances.

(Image: A classical Greek marble bust depicting a warrior or philosopher with a resolute expression, eyes fixed forward, symbolizing unwavering determination and inner strength amidst potential strife, perhaps with subtle lines of age or experience etched on the face.)

Defining Courage in the Crucible of Conflict

The demands of war reveal courage in many forms, each vital to the collective effort. It is rarely a monolithic quality but rather a spectrum of fortitude.

| Type of Courage | Description

Duty, Sacrifice, and the Warrior's Ethos

The concept of duty is inextricably linked to courage in times of war. Whether it is the duty of a soldier to hold their ground, a commander to make difficult strategic decisions, or a leader to inspire their populace, courage is the force that enables the fulfillment of these obligations.

From Machiavelli's The Prince, we learn that a leader must possess both virtù (a blend of skill, strength, and courage) and fortuna (luck) to navigate the tempestuous seas of statecraft, especially during conflict. The courage to act decisively, even ruthlessly when necessary, is presented as a practical necessity for the preservation of the state.

Consider these aspects of duty requiring courage:

  1. Facing Personal Danger: The most obvious form, where soldiers put their lives on the line.
  2. Moral Courage in Command: Leaders making decisions that will cost lives, knowing the immense burden of responsibility. Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War offers numerous examples of leaders wrestling with such dilemmas, their courage or lack thereof directly influencing outcomes.
  3. Intellectual Courage: The ability to challenge established dogma, adapt strategies, and admit mistakes, even under pressure.
  4. Courage to Uphold Justice: Ensuring ethical conduct even in the brutal environment of war, resisting atrocities, and protecting the innocent. This speaks to a higher form of duty—to humanity itself.

Beyond the Battlefield: Courage for War and Peace

While the immediate context of courage is often war, its necessity extends to the pursuit and maintenance of peace. The courage required to end a conflict can be as profound as that needed to fight one.

The transition from war to peace demands:

  • Courage to Negotiate: To sit with former enemies, to compromise, and to envision a shared future.
  • Courage to Forgive: To move past grievances and seek reconciliation.
  • Courage to Rebuild: To invest in stability and justice, even when scars run deep and trust is fragile.
  • Courage to Resist Provocation: To de-escalate tensions and choose diplomacy over renewed conflict, even when popular sentiment clamors for vengeance.

Ultimately, the courage manifest in war is not solely for destruction, but often for the hope of a better peace. The sacrifice of those who displayed courage on the battlefield is often justified by the aspiration for a future free from such horrors. This overarching perspective underscores that courage is a timeless virtue, indispensable for both the trials of conflict and the arduous journey towards lasting harmony.

YouTube: "Plato Laches courage philosophy summary"
YouTube: "Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics courage virtue"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Necessity of Courage in War philosophy"

Share this post