The Necessity of Courage in War

By Benjamin Richmond

In the grim calculus of conflict, where life and death hang precariously in the balance, courage emerges not merely as an admirable trait but as an absolute necessity. This article explores how courage, understood not just as an absence of fear but as a reasoned virtue, forms the bedrock of individual and collective action in times of war. Drawing insights from the enduring wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World, we will examine its indispensable role in navigating the brutal realities of War and Peace, connecting it inextricably to the concepts of Necessity and Contingency and the profound weight of Duty.

Courage: A Cardinal Virtue Reexamined

From the ancient battlefields described by Homer to the strategic treatises of Machiavelli, the concept of courage has consistently been a cornerstone of military thought and moral philosophy. Yet, its true nature transcends simple bravery. For Plato, courage (andreia) was one of the four cardinal virtues, enabling the spirited part of the soul to stand firm in the face of danger, guided by reason. Aristotle further refined this, defining courage as a mean between rashness and cowardice, a deliberate choice to face danger for a noble end.

Beyond Mere Bravery: The Rational Dimension of Courage

True courage in war is not a blind rush into peril, nor is it the absence of fear, which is a natural human response to existential threat. Instead, it is the rational apprehension of danger, combined with the will to endure and act despite that fear, in pursuit of a greater good or a perceived duty. It is the soldier who, understanding the contingency of battle—the unpredictable chaos, the sudden turn of fortune—still chooses to hold the line, to advance, or to protect their comrades. This reasoned fortitude is a necessity for cohesion and effectiveness in the face of overwhelming odds.

The Nexus of War, Peace, and Duty

War, by its very nature, is a profound disruption of peace, a realm where ordinary moral rules are tested and often fractured. Yet, even within this realm of heightened stakes, certain virtues become even more critical. The decision to engage in war, or to defend against aggression, often stems from a perceived necessity to protect values, territory, or life itself. Once engaged, the individual soldier is bound by a complex web of duty.

The Ethical Imperative: Duty in the Face of Conflict

Duty—to one's comrades, to one's nation, to a cause—is a powerful motivator, often requiring immense courage. Philosophers like Kant emphasized duty as a moral imperative, an action performed out of respect for the moral law itself. In the context of war, this translates into a commitment that transcends personal fear, demanding self-sacrifice for the collective good. This form of courage, rooted in duty, allows individuals to confront the contingent horrors of battle—the sudden loss, the unexpected attack, the overwhelming despair—with a steadfastness that is otherwise impossible. It is the moral backbone that prevents disintegration under pressure.

Table 1: Philosophical Perspectives on Courage and Duty in War

Philosopher/Tradition Key Concept of Courage Connection to Duty/Necessity
Plato Andreia (Fortitude) Rational control of spirit for justice; necessary for the just state.
Aristotle Virtuous Mean Deliberate choice in danger for noble ends; essential for human flourishing.
Stoicism Apatheia/Endurance Steadfastness in facing external events beyond control; duty to reason and virtue.
Augustine Just War Theory Courage in defense of justice, but sorrowful; duty to God and righteous order.
Kant Moral Imperative Action from duty, not inclination; courage as a necessary component of moral action.

Necessity and Contingency in the Crucible of Battle

The environment of war is characterized by both necessity and contingency. There are necessary actions dictated by strategy, survival, or moral imperative. Yet, war is also a realm of profound contingency—the unpredictable fog of war, the chance encounter, the unforeseen consequence. A sudden storm, a lucky shot, a miscommunication—these contingent events can alter the course of battle, demanding an immediate and often courageous response.

Courage, therefore, is not merely about facing known threats but about adapting to the unknown and the unexpected. It is the mental and moral resilience that allows individuals and units to persist when plans fail, when allies fall, and when the future seems utterly bleak. This adaptive courage is a necessity for survival and victory in an inherently unpredictable environment. Without it, the overwhelming contingencies of war would lead to paralysis and defeat. It is the steadfastness to continue the fight, even when the necessity of the mission seems to clash with the contingent horrors unfolding.

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting a lone soldier, perhaps a Spartan or Roman, standing firm amidst the chaos of battle. His stance is resolute, shield raised, eyes focused, while around him, the scene is a maelstrom of clashing weapons, falling figures, and rising dust, conveying both immense danger and unyielding resolve. The light highlights his determined expression, contrasting with the shadows of surrounding conflict.)

The Philosophical Foundation of Military Ethos

The philosophical tradition, particularly as encapsulated in the Great Books, provides a robust framework for understanding the enduring necessity of courage. From the Homeric heroes who embodied arête (excellence) through their valor, to the Roman emphasis on virtus (manly courage and civic duty), the idea that courage is fundamental to both individual honor and collective well-being has been consistently affirmed. Even in discussions of War and Peace, where the ultimate goal is the cessation of conflict, the virtues required to achieve a just peace often involve courageous action in the face of injustice or aggression.

The enduring relevance of these ideas underscores that courage is not just a tactical asset but a profound ethical one. It is the virtue that allows individuals to uphold their duty, confront necessity, and navigate contingency with integrity, even in the most extreme circumstances.

Conclusion

In the final analysis, the necessity of courage in war is not debatable. It is the indispensable virtue that allows individuals to confront fear, uphold duty, and navigate the inherent contingencies of conflict. Drawing from the deep wellspring of philosophical thought, we recognize courage as a reasoned, moral choice, fundamental to human dignity and collective survival in the face of existential threat. Its presence defines the potential for resilience and justice, while its absence guarantees collapse.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Republic Courage Aristotle Virtue Ethics War""
2. ## 📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant Duty Ethics War Philosophy""

Share this post