The Necessity of Courage for Liberty

By Chloe Fitzgerald

Liberty, often cherished as an inherent right, is in truth a fragile construct, perpetually demanding vigilance and, most critically, courage. It is not a passive inheritance but an active, ongoing achievement. This article argues that without courageous individuals willing to challenge injustice, speak truth to power, and defend fundamental principles, freedom becomes susceptible to erosion by apathy, fear, or the overreach of the State. Drawing insights from the Great Books of the Western World, we will explore the profound relationship between courage, liberty, and the State, particularly through the lens of necessity and contingency, demonstrating why the bold spirit is not merely admirable but absolutely indispensable for a free society.

The Fragile Foundation of Freedom

We often speak of liberty as a given, a default state of human existence. Yet, history repeatedly demonstrates that freedom is contingent—it can be granted, restricted, or entirely lost. The very fabric of a free society is woven with the threads of individual and collective action, and at the heart of this action lies courage. It is the virtue that enables us to confront fear, danger, uncertainty, and intimidation, especially when standing against powerful forces that threaten autonomy and justice. Without this foundational virtue, the intricate mechanisms designed to protect liberty—laws, constitutions, democratic institutions—can become hollow shells, easily manipulated or overthrown.

(Image: A classical marble sculpture depicting a cloaked figure, possibly a philosopher or orator, with a determined expression, one hand resting on a scroll, standing against a backdrop of a city under a turbulent sky, symbolizing the intellectual and moral courage required to uphold ideals in challenging times.)

Courage: A Prerequisite, Not an Option

Courage is more than mere physical bravery in battle. As Aristotle detailed in his Nicomachean Ethics, true courage is a moral virtue, a mean between the extremes of cowardice and rashness. For the sustenance of liberty, it manifests in diverse forms:

  • Moral Courage: The strength to stand by one's convictions, even when unpopular or facing social ostracism. It is the courage to speak out against injustice, to challenge prevailing dogmas, and to uphold ethical principles.
  • Intellectual Courage: The willingness to question assumptions, to pursue truth wherever it leads, and to engage in critical self-reflection, even if it means abandoning comfortable beliefs. John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty, champions this, arguing that the free exchange of ideas, however challenging, is vital for societal progress and individual development.
  • Civic Courage: The readiness to participate in public life, to hold power accountable, and to defend the rights and freedoms of oneself and others, often at personal risk. This is the courage to vote, to protest, to organize, and to resist tyranny.

These forms of courage are not optional extras; they are necessary conditions for the flourishing of liberty. Without them, the path of least resistance often leads to conformity, silence, and ultimately, subjugation.

Liberty: A State of Being, A Constant Struggle

Liberty encompasses more than just political freedom; it is a holistic state of being that includes freedom of thought, expression, conscience, and the right to self-determination within a just framework. It implies freedom from arbitrary control and freedom to pursue one's potential. However, liberty is inherently contingent. It is not a natural law that automatically asserts itself, but a delicate balance that must be continually nurtured and defended.

Consider the historical trajectory of human societies: periods of liberty are often hard-won and rarely stable. They are the result of conscious effort, sacrifice, and often, acts of profound courage by individuals and groups. The very existence of a free society is thus contingent upon the ongoing exercise of courage by its citizens.

The State: Protector and Potential Oppressor

The State presents a complex paradox for liberty. On the one hand, a well-ordered State is necessary for the protection of individual rights and the maintenance of societal peace. Without the State, as Hobbes argued in Leviathan, life could be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short," a condition inimical to any form of liberty. The State provides the legal framework, the institutions, and the security that allow individuals to exercise their freedoms without constant fear.

On the other hand, the State, with its concentrated power, is also the primary potential oppressor of liberty. Its contingent nature—the particular form it takes, the scope of its power, and the benevolence or malevolence of its leaders—means it can easily morph from protector to tyrant. History is replete with examples where states, in the name of order, security, or ideology, have systematically dismantled freedoms, suppressed dissent, and subjugated populations. It is precisely at these junctures that courage becomes not just desirable, but absolutely necessary.

The Interplay of Necessity and Contingency

The philosophical interplay of necessity and contingency illuminates why courage is so vital for liberty.

  • Necessity: It is necessary for individuals to live in some form of social and political order, often embodied by a State. It is also necessary for individuals to possess a degree of autonomy and rights to live a truly human life. Furthermore, courage, in its various forms, is a necessary virtue for navigating the challenges of existence and for upholding any moral or political ideal.
  • Contingency: While a State is necessary, the form it takes (democratic, autocratic, etc.) is contingent. While individual rights are desirable, their realization and preservation are contingent upon active defense. And crucially, the presence and exercise of courage within a populace are contingent—they are not guaranteed but must be cultivated and called upon.

This means that the existence of liberty is not a necessary outcome of human society; it is a contingent achievement, constantly dependent on the necessary presence of courage. If citizens lack the courage to speak out, to resist, to question, then liberty's fate becomes contingent upon the benevolence of those in power—a precarious and often fleeting reliance. The absence of courage transforms liberty from a robust right into a fragile privilege, easily withdrawn.

Historical Echoes and Philosophical Insights

The Great Books of the Western World offer profound insights into this relationship:

| Philosopher/Work | Key Contribution to Courage & Liberty | Plato (Republic) | The philosopher-king, the guardians who defend the ideal city. The courage to pursue justice and truth, even against conventional opinion.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Necessity of Courage for Liberty philosophy"

Share this post