The Enduring Question: What is the Definition of Courage?

Courage, in its essence, is far more than simply the absence of fear; it is a complex and multifaceted virtue that has captivated philosophers from antiquity to the present day. To truly grasp its definition, we must delve into its intricate relationship with emotion, its position within the spectrum of virtue and vice, and the nuanced contexts in which it manifests. This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of courage, drawing insights from the venerable texts of the Great Books of the Western World, to illuminate its profound significance for human flourishing.

Unpacking the Definition of Courage

At its core, courage is often understood as the mental or moral strength to venture, persevere, and withstand danger, fear, or difficulty. However, this simplistic view barely scratches the surface. Philosophers have long grappled with what constitutes true courage, distinguishing it from mere recklessness or brute stubbornness.

Courage Beyond Fearlessness

One of the most critical distinctions in understanding courage is that it does not imply a lack of fear. On the contrary, genuine courage often requires an acute awareness of danger and the emotion of fear, yet involves acting despite it. As many thinkers, notably Aristotle, have argued, a truly courageous person feels fear appropriately but chooses to act in accordance with reason and noble purpose.

Courage as a Virtue: The Golden Mean

In the philosophical tradition, particularly within the works of Aristotle, courage is presented as a cardinal virtue, occupying a crucial middle ground – a "golden mean" – between two destructive extremes, or vices.

Vice (Deficiency) Virtue (Mean) Vice (Excess)
Cowardice Courage Rashness / Foolhardiness
Characterized by an excessive fear of danger, leading to inaction or flight. The disposition to face danger and pain appropriately, for a noble end, and with proper judgment. Characterized by an insufficient fear of danger, leading to reckless or impulsive action without due consideration.

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, meticulously details how courage is not merely an impulse but a deliberate choice, informed by practical wisdom. It is about knowing what is truly fearful and what is not, and acting bravely for the sake of what is noble.

The Intimate Relationship with Emotion

The definition of courage is inextricably linked to our understanding of emotion. Fear, of course, is the primary emotion against which courage is measured. But other emotions also play a role:

  • Fear: The central antagonist. Courage is the mastery over fear, not its absence. It involves assessing danger and choosing to face it when reason dictates it is noble or necessary.
  • Hope: A courageous person may harbor hope for a positive outcome, but their action is not solely dependent on it. They act even when hope is dim.
  • Anger: While anger can fuel bravery, it is distinct from true courage. Rash acts born of anger alone are often closer to the vice of foolhardiness than the virtue of courage.
  • Shame/Honor: In some contexts, the fear of dishonor or shame might compel brave acts. However, truly virtuous courage stems from an internal commitment to the good, rather than purely external pressures.

Historical Perspectives from the Great Books

The quest for the definition of courage is a recurring theme throughout the Great Books of the Western World.

Plato and the Pursuit of Knowledge

In Plato's Laches, Socrates engages in a dialogue with two generals, Laches and Nicias, attempting to define courage. The discussion moves beyond simple endurance or bravery in battle, suggesting that true courage might be a form of knowledge – the knowledge of what is truly to be feared and what is not. For Socrates, courage without wisdom is mere stubbornness or madness.

Aristotle's Practical Virtue

As previously noted, Aristotle provides a foundational account of courage as a practical virtue. He emphasizes that the courageous person acts for the sake of the kalon – the noble or the beautiful – and does so with a rational assessment of the situation, not out of passion or ignorance. His analysis distinguishes between various forms of "bravery" that might appear courageous but are not truly so (e.g., bravery born of experience, ignorance, or passion).

Thomas Aquinas: Fortitude and the Good

Building on Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, further elaborates on courage (which he often refers to as fortitude). For Aquinas, fortitude is a moral virtue that moderates fear and daring, enabling one to endure difficulties and pursue the good even in the face of grave danger. He distinguishes between the active aspect (attacking) and the passive aspect (enduring), both essential components of courage.

The Many Faces of Courage

Beyond the battlefield, courage manifests in various forms, each requiring different kinds of strength and resolve:

  • Physical Courage: The willingness to face bodily harm, pain, or death. This is often the most commonly recognized form.
  • Moral Courage: The strength to stand up for one's ethical principles, truth, or justice, even in the face of social ostracism, ridicule, or professional repercussions. This often involves confronting societal norms or powerful individuals.
  • Intellectual Courage: The willingness to challenge one's own beliefs, question established dogma, or pursue uncomfortable truths, even if it means admitting error or facing intellectual isolation.
  • Emotional Courage: The capacity to confront difficult emotions, express vulnerability, or engage in self-reflection and personal growth, despite the discomfort it may bring.
  • Existential Courage: The bravery to face the inherent anxieties of human existence – mortality, meaninglessness, freedom, and isolation – and to create meaning in a world devoid of inherent purpose.

(Image: A detailed classical Greek bas-relief sculpture depicting Heracles wrestling the Nemean Lion, symbolizing the triumph of courage and strength over formidable adversity, with Heracles's determined expression and powerful stance embodying unwavering resolve.)

Conclusion: A Virtue for All Times

The definition of courage is not static; it evolves with our understanding of human nature and the challenges we face. Yet, the core philosophical insights from the Great Books remain profoundly relevant. Courage is not merely an instinct but a cultivated virtue, a deliberate choice to act nobly despite emotion like fear, and a critical balance between recklessness and cowardice. It is an indispensable quality for living a life of integrity, purpose, and genuine human flourishing.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Courage Explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato Laches Dialogue Summary Philosophy""

Share this post