The Enduring Connection Between Custom and Law: Shaping the State and Society

The fabric of human society is woven from countless threads, some visible and rigid, others unseen and flexible. Among the most fundamental of these threads are custom and law. While often perceived as distinct entities—one informal and traditional, the other formal and codified—their relationship is, in fact, an intricate and inseparable connection. This pillar page delves into how custom and convention serve as both the bedrock and the evolving force behind the law, profoundly influencing the very structure and legitimacy of the State. From ancient philosophical inquiries to contemporary legal systems, understanding this dynamic interplay is crucial for comprehending how societies are governed, how norms are established, and how justice is pursued.

Unpacking the Fundamentals: Custom, Convention, Law, and the State

Before we explore their connection, let us first define our terms, as clarity in concepts is the bedrock of philosophical inquiry.

  • Custom: At its heart, custom refers to a long-established practice or usage that has acquired the force of an unwritten rule. These are the ways things "have always been done," passed down through generations, often without explicit articulation. They are deeply embedded in social behavior, guiding everything from etiquette to economic exchange.
  • Convention: Closely related to custom, a convention often implies a more deliberate, though still unwritten, agreement or understanding within a group or society. While customs evolve organically, conventions might be adopted for practical reasons, such as driving on a particular side of the road, or for social harmony, like greeting rituals. Both custom and convention operate on the principle of shared expectation and social sanction rather than formal enforcement.
  • Law: In contrast, law comprises a system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties. Laws are typically written, codified, and enforced by a governing authority.
  • State: The State is the political organization that holds a monopoly on the legitimate use of force within a given territory. It is the entity responsible for creating, interpreting, and enforcing laws, and for maintaining public order and providing public services. The State's authority and legitimacy often depend on its ability to reflect, or at least accommodate, the customs and conventions of its populace.

Historical Perspectives: The Genesis of Law from Custom

The idea that laws do not emerge from a vacuum, but rather from the collective habits and beliefs of a people, is a recurring theme in the Great Books of the Western World.

Ancient Roots: The Polis and Natural Order

In ancient Greece, thinkers like Plato and Aristotle grappled with the origins of political order. Aristotle, in his Politics, observed the natural progression of human association from family to village to polis (city-state). For Aristotle, the laws of the polis were not arbitrary but grew from the character and customs of its citizens, aiming to foster the good life. He noted that good laws would reflect the natural order and the virtues valued by the community. Similarly, Plato’s Laws explores how the ideal State would codify principles that align with reason and tradition, suggesting that an unwritten constitution of customs often underpins the written laws.

Roman Law: Custom as the Foundation

The development of Roman law provides a clear historical illustration. Early Roman law, or Jus Civile, was heavily influenced by the mos maiorum (ancestral custom). Over time, as Rome expanded, the Jus Gentium (law of nations) emerged, drawing upon the common customs and principles observed among various peoples, demonstrating how shared conventions could form the basis of broader legal systems. The Roman jurists understood that for laws to be effective, they had to resonate with the established practices of the people.

Medieval Thought: Divine Custom and Human Law

During the Medieval period, philosophers like Thomas Aquinas integrated classical thought with Christian theology. Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, articulated the concept of natural law, suggesting that human laws derive their legitimacy from a higher, divine law, which is often revealed through natural reason and the customs that align with it. For Aquinas, a human law that contradicts natural law (which is often expressed through universal moral customs) is not a true law.

The Enlightenment: Social Contract and the Spirit of Laws

The Enlightenment era brought forth theories that explicitly linked societal conventions to the formation of the State and its laws.

  • Social Contract Theorists (Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau): These thinkers posited that the State itself is founded upon a fundamental convention or agreement among individuals to surrender certain rights for collective security and governance.
    • John Locke argued for natural rights that precede the State, but the specific implementation and protection of these rights are shaped by societal customs and the laws enacted by consent.
    • Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the "general will," a collective convention or common interest that should guide the laws of the State. For Rousseau, laws are legitimate only when they express this collective will, which is deeply rooted in the shared values and customs of the community.
  • Montesquieu: In The Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu meticulously argued that laws are not universal but are deeply intertwined with the "spirit" of a nation, which includes its climate, religion, commerce, and, crucially, its manners and customs. He believed that laws must be adapted to the particular characteristics of a people, suggesting a profound connection between the social fabric and the legal framework.

The Dynamic Interplay: How Custom and Law Mutually Influence Each Other

The relationship between custom and law is not static; it's a constant dance of influence, adaptation, and sometimes, conflict.

Custom as the Precursor and Source of Law

Many formal laws originate as informal customs that, through widespread acceptance and necessity, become codified.

  • Common Law Systems: In countries with common law traditions (like the UK, USA, Canada), judicial decisions often draw heavily on established customs and precedents. What was once a local practice or a widely accepted way of doing business can be recognized and enforced by courts, thereby becoming law.
  • Property Rights: Early concepts of property ownership, inheritance, and contracts often began as customs before being formalized into statutory laws.
  • Commercial Law: Many principles of commercial law, such as those governing trade and finance, evolved from long-standing conventions among merchants.

Law Formalizing and Shaping Custom

While custom can give rise to law, law also possesses the power to formalize, standardize, or even alter customs.

  • Standardization: Laws can take diverse local customs and standardize them across a State, creating uniformity where there was once variety.
  • Social Change: Laws can be instruments of social change, aiming to modify or abolish discriminatory customs. For example, civil rights legislation in many countries sought to dismantle long-standing racial segregation customs.
  • Reinforcement: Laws can reinforce positive customs by giving them legal backing, ensuring their adherence through penalties.

The State as the Mediator and Enforcer

The State plays a pivotal role in this connection. It acts as the institution that:

  • Identifies and Codifies: The State, through its legislative bodies, identifies prevalent customs and conventions that are deemed beneficial or necessary for social order and translates them into formal laws.
  • Enforces and Adjudicates: The State's judicial and executive branches enforce these laws, settling disputes that arise from their application and ensuring compliance.
  • Balances and Reforms: The State must constantly balance the need to respect existing customs with the imperative to adapt to new social realities and promote justice, sometimes requiring the reform or abolition of outdated laws or customs.

Table: Custom vs. Law – Key Distinctions and Overlaps

Feature Custom Law Overlap/Connection
Origin Organic, evolutionary, community practice Deliberate enactment by a sovereign authority Many laws originate from customs
Form Unwritten, informal, traditional Written, codified, formal Laws can formalize and standardize customs
Enforcement Social pressure, peer sanction, tradition State apparatus (police, courts, penalties) Laws gain legitimacy when aligned with customs; customs can be enforced by law
Flexibility Gradual change, adaptable over time Can be changed relatively quickly by legislation Laws can accelerate or decelerate changes in custom
Scope Often local or group-specific Generally universal within a State's jurisdiction State laws attempt to harmonize diverse local customs
Legitimacy Derived from long-standing acceptance Derived from state authority and due process Law's legitimacy is enhanced by congruence with deeply held customs

Generated Image

Modern Relevance: Custom, Law, and the Evolving State

The connection between custom and law remains profoundly relevant in the contemporary world.

  • International Law: Many principles of international law and diplomacy are built upon long-standing international conventions and practices among States. Treaties often codify these unwritten norms into formal agreements.
  • Cultural Diversity and Legal Pluralism: In multicultural societies, the State often grapples with how to integrate or accommodate diverse cultural customs within a unified legal framework. This leads to discussions about legal pluralism, where certain customary laws might be recognized alongside state law.
  • Evolving Social Norms: New customs are constantly emerging, particularly in areas like digital ethics, environmental responsibility, and human rights. As these conventions gain traction, there is often pressure for the State to codify them into laws, reflecting society's changing values.
  • Legitimacy of Law: When laws diverge too sharply from the deeply held customs and moral conventions of a society, their legitimacy can be undermined, leading to civil disobedience, protests, and a breakdown of public trust in the State.

The connection between custom and law is not merely a historical curiosity but a living, breathing aspect of governance. From the ancient polis to the modern State, the most effective and enduring legal systems are those that acknowledge and integrate the customs and conventions of their people. Custom provides the deep cultural roots, the shared understanding, and the organic practices that give law its meaning and its social acceptance. Law, in turn, offers the formal structure, the enforcement mechanism, and the capacity for deliberate change that custom often lacks.

As Daniel Sanderson, I contend that neglecting this intricate connection leads to brittle laws and an unstable State. A truly just and resilient society understands that its laws must, to a significant extent, be an articulation of its collective customs and values, while also possessing the foresight to guide and shape those customs towards a more equitable future. This ongoing dialogue between the formal and the informal, the written and the unwritten, is essential for the flourishing of human communities.

Further Exploration

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Great Books of the Western World on Law and Justice""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""The Social Contract Theory Explained""

Share this post