War and Peace as States of Existence: A Philosophical Inquiry

Summary: War and peace are often perceived as mere events—the eruption or cessation of hostilities—but a deeper philosophical lens reveals them as fundamental states of human existence, both individual and collective. Far from being static, these states are in constant change, profoundly influencing the cycles of life and death. Drawing from the enduring wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World, this article explores how understanding war and peace as ontological conditions, rather than just historical occurrences, illuminates our understanding of human nature, society, and the perpetual struggle for meaning.

The Perennial Dance: War and Peace Beyond Conflict

We speak of "going to war" or "making peace," as if these were discrete actions, singular points in time. Yet, to confine our understanding of War and Peace to the battlefield or the negotiating table is to miss their profound, pervasive influence on the very fabric of being. Philosophers throughout history have grappled with the idea that these are not just external phenomena, but inherent states that define communities, individuals, and even the cosmos itself.

More Than Absence or Presence: Deeper Modes of Being

Consider for a moment: Is peace merely the absence of war? Or is it a rich, affirmative condition – a state of flourishing, cooperation, and creative endeavor? Similarly, is war simply armed conflict, or does it represent a deeper, perhaps even primal, state of discord, competition, and existential struggle that can manifest in various forms, both overt and subtle?

The distinction is crucial. If peace is merely the cessation of hostilities, it is fragile, a temporary truce. But if it is a state of being, it implies an active cultivation, a societal architecture, and a personal disposition. The same applies to war; it can be a pervasive underlying tension, a structural injustice, or an ideological battle that predates any physical engagement, truly a state of collective unease.

A Dialectic of Being: The Inevitability of Change

The ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus famously declared, "War is the father of all things." While often interpreted as a glorification of conflict, it can also be understood as an assertion that change and tension are fundamental to existence. The interplay between opposing forces—light and dark, hot and cold, War and Peace—drives the world forward, shaping and reshaping reality. This dialectical view suggests that these states are not fixed endpoints but dynamic elements in a continuous process of becoming. There is no static peace, nor is there a perpetual war without moments of respite and regrouping. Change is the only constant, and with it, the shifting balance between these two fundamental modes of being.

Philosophical Lenses on War and Peace as States

The intellectual heritage enshrined in the Great Books of the Western World offers a rich tapestry of perspectives on War and Peace as existential conditions. From ancient city-states to modern international relations, thinkers have sought to define, understand, and perhaps even transcend these fundamental states.

Ancient Wisdom: From Chaos to Cosmos

  • Plato's Republic: For Plato, the ideal state (polis) is one characterized by justice, where each part performs its function harmoniously. Internal strife within the soul or the city is a form of "war," while inner balance and civic order represent "peace." The philosopher-king's rule aims to guide the state towards this peaceful, just existence, reflecting a deeper cosmic harmony. An unjust society, conversely, is in a perpetual state of internal conflict, even if outwardly calm.
  • Aristotle's Politics: Aristotle viewed the state as a natural institution designed to enable citizens to achieve the "good life" (eudaimonia). Peace, therefore, is not just the absence of war, but the necessary condition for intellectual, moral, and civic flourishing. War, while sometimes necessary for defense, is ultimately antithetical to the state's higher purpose of fostering human excellence.
  • Heraclitus (Fragments): As mentioned, "War is the father of all things, and king of all; and some he has made gods and some men, some bond and some free." This profound statement suggests that conflict and opposition are not aberrations but fundamental forces that drive creation and differentiation, constantly shaping the state of existence.

Medieval Reflections: Inner Turmoil and Divine Order

  • Augustine's City of God: Saint Augustine grappled with the problem of evil and the fleeting nature of earthly peace. He posited that true peace (tranquillitas ordinis, the tranquility of order) is ultimately found in the divine state, the City of God. Earthly peace, even if desirable, is always imperfect, a temporary truce in a world marked by sin and internal struggle. The individual soul, too, is a battleground between carnal desires and spiritual aspirations, representing an ongoing internal War and Peace.

Modern Perspectives: The Social Contract and the Leviathan

  • Hobbes' Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes famously described the "natural state of mankind" as a "war of every man against every man," where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." For Hobbes, peace is not natural but an artificial construct achieved only through the absolute power of a sovereign, the Leviathan, which enforces order and prevents society from descending back into the chaotic state of war.
  • Rousseau's Social Contract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, while disagreeing with Hobbes on the nature of man, also explored the transition from a natural state to a civil one. Peace, for Rousseau, is achieved through the collective will of the people, where individuals surrender some personal freedoms for the common good. However, if the general will is corrupted, the state can easily descend into internal "war" through tyranny or factionalism.
  • Kant's Perpetual Peace: Immanuel Kant envisioned a future where reason could lead humanity to a state of "perpetual peace" through international law, republican constitutions, and a federation of free states. For Kant, peace is not merely a cessation of hostilities but a moral imperative, an ideal state that humanity is obligated to strive for through rational and ethical action, emphasizing that true peace requires a fundamental change in how nations interact.

The Intimate Connection to Life and Death

The fundamental nature of War and Peace as states of existence is nowhere more evident than in their direct and undeniable impact on Life and Death. These are not abstract concepts but conditions that dictate whether individuals and societies flourish or perish.

War's Shadow: The Erosion of Life

The state of war is synonymous with death—not just the physical demise of combatants and civilians, but the death of culture, trust, innovation, and hope. It is a condition that actively erodes the foundations of life: destroying infrastructure, disrupting education, fostering trauma, and diverting resources from human flourishing to destruction. Even for those who survive, the scars of war—physical and psychological—can persist for generations, a lingering state of suffering.

Peace's Promise: The Flourishing of Life

Conversely, the state of peace provides the fertile ground for life to thrive. It allows for the construction of societies, the pursuit of knowledge, the creation of art, and the nurturing of families. In a state of peace, human potential can be realized; creativity blossoms, economies grow, and individuals are free to pursue happiness and self-actualization. Peace is the precondition for the full expression of life in all its myriad forms.

The Constant Flux: Change as the Only Constant

The relationship between War and Peace and Life and Death is dynamic, marked by perpetual change. A period of peace can give way to war, and even in the midst of conflict, seeds of future peace can be sown. Empires rise and fall, civilizations emerge and recede, all driven by this ceaseless interplay. The very act of living is a negotiation with these forces, an acknowledgement that our existence is always in flux, always subject to the profound change that these fundamental states bring.

(Image: A detailed depiction of a classical Greek fresco showing two allegorical figures: one, a stern, armored warrior with a broken spear, representing "War," looking towards a desolate landscape; the other, a serene, robed woman holding an olive branch and a scroll, representing "Peace," gazing towards a vibrant, growing city in the background, symbolizing the choice between destruction and creation.)

Understanding War and Peace as fundamental states of existence, rather than isolated events, shifts our perspective and, crucially, our responsibility.

Individual Responsibility: Shaping the Collective State

Our personal choices, attitudes, and actions contribute to the collective state of War and Peace. Do we foster dialogue or division? Do we seek understanding or perpetuate prejudice? The internal battles we fight within ourselves, the peace we cultivate in our homes, all ripple outwards, influencing the larger societal state. As individuals, we are not passive observers but active participants in the ongoing dance of change between these fundamental conditions.

The Imperative of Understanding

The journey through the Great Books reveals a consistent truth: to comprehend life and death, we must first grasp the pervasive nature of War and Peace as defining states of our reality. This understanding is not merely academic; it is an imperative for navigating our world, for choosing paths that lead to flourishing rather than destruction. It calls us to reflect on the deeper currents that shape human experience, to recognize the subtle shifts between harmony and discord, and to actively work towards a state of being that promotes collective well-being.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Hobbes' Leviathan - A Summary" - Explore the philosophical foundations of state authority and the avoidance of the 'state of nature' in this concise overview."

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant's Perpetual Peace Explained" - Dive into Kant's vision for a world free from war, examining his proposals for international law and republican governance."

Conclusion

The philosophical exploration of War and Peace as fundamental states of existence, rather than fleeting occurrences, offers profound insights into the human condition. From the ancient Greeks who saw conflict as a driver of change, to the medieval thinkers who grappled with inner peace, and the modern philosophers who sought to engineer societal harmony, the Great Books of the Western World consistently reveal the deep, pervasive influence of these two conditions. They are inextricably linked to life and death, defining the possibilities and limitations of our being. By recognizing War and Peace as dynamic, ever-changing states, we are empowered to engage more thoughtfully with the world, striving to cultivate those conditions that allow for genuine flourishing and the enduring promise of peace.

Share this post