The Shadow of Eden: Unpacking the Theological Problem of Evil (Sin)

The existence of suffering, injustice, and malevolence in a world purportedly created and overseen by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God presents one of philosophy and theology's most enduring and vexing dilemmas. This is the heart of the Problem of Evil. Specifically, when we focus on Sin as a primary explanation for this evil within a theological framework, we delve into a profound attempt to reconcile divine omnibenevolence with human suffering. This pillar page will explore the origins, implications, and various responses to the Theological Problem of Evil, with a particular emphasis on the concept of Sin, drawing insights from the rich tradition of the Great Books of the Western World.

The Enduring Riddle: What is the Problem of Evil?

At its core, the Problem of Evil asks how Good and Evil can coexist with a perfect deity. If God is truly omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing), and omnibenevolent (all-good), why does evil exist? This fundamental tension has challenged thinkers for millennia, from ancient Greek philosophers to modern theologians.

The problem can be framed logically:

  1. If God is omnibenevolent, He desires to eliminate evil.
  2. If God is omnipotent, He is able to eliminate evil.
  3. If God is omniscient, He knows how to eliminate evil.
  4. Evil exists.
  5. Therefore, a God with all three attributes cannot exist.

The theological response, however, often introduces a crucial element: Sin. Rather than denying God's attributes, theology frequently posits that evil is not a direct creation of God but rather a consequence of choices made by His creation.

Defining the Terms: God, Good, Evil, and Sin

To navigate this complex terrain, it is essential to establish a clear understanding of the key concepts at play.

Core Concepts in Theological Discourse

| Term | Definition (Theological Context) to the concept of Good and Evil, theologically, is often rooted in a privation of the good, rather than an independent force. As Augustine argued in Confessions and City of God, evil is not a substance, but a defect or absence of the good that God created. Sin then, becomes the willful turning away from this inherent good or God's will.

The Genesis of Sin: A Theological Explanation for Evil

The introduction of Sin into the theological framework offers a powerful answer to the Problem of Evil. It shifts the responsibility for suffering and moral transgression from God to humanity (or other created beings).

The Free Will Defense

Perhaps the most influential theological response is the Free Will Defense, championed prominently by St. Augustine. This argument posits that a world containing free moral agents, even with the potential for evil, is intrinsically more valuable than a world without such freedom, where moral good would be impossible.

  • God, in His infinite wisdom and love, granted humanity free will.
  • For free will to be genuine, it must include the ability to choose against God's will, to choose evil.
  • Sin is the exercise of this free will in defiance of God's perfect law.
  • Therefore, evil (specifically moral evil) is not directly God's creation, but a consequence of humanity's misuse of its divinely bestowed freedom.

This defense attributes moral evil (e.g., murder, hatred, war) to human choice. However, it raises further questions about natural evil (e.g., earthquakes, disease). Many theological traditions link natural evil to the fall of humanity through original sin, suggesting that the entire created order was affected by this initial transgression.

(Image: A detailed depiction of Adam and Eve reaching for the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, with a subtle serpent figure entwined around the tree, symbolizing the moment of original sin and the introduction of moral evil into the world. The scene is bathed in a contrasting light, with a looming shadow representing the impending consequences.)

Original Sin and its Legacy

The concept of Original Sin, particularly as developed by Augustine, profoundly shaped Western theology. It argues that the first sin of Adam and Eve brought a corrupted nature upon all their descendants. This inherited predisposition to sin (concupiscence) explains why humans are prone to evil and why suffering pervades the world, even for those who have not committed specific transgressions. This doctrine asserts that humanity is not merely capable of sinning, but is born into a state of sin, requiring divine grace for redemption.

Theodicies: Justifying God's Ways

Theological attempts to reconcile God's attributes with the existence of evil are known as theodicies. While the Free Will Defense is central, different theologies offer varied nuances.

Augustinian Theodicy

As discussed, this perspective emphasizes God's perfection, the goodness of creation, and the origin of evil as a privation of good resulting from the misuse of free will by angels and humans. The world was created perfect, evil entered through sin, and suffering is a just consequence. God is not responsible for evil; humanity is.

Irenaean (Soul-Making) Theodicy

Proposed by Irenaeus of Lyon and later developed by John Hick, this theodicy views the world not as a perfect paradise corrupted by sin, but as a "soul-making" environment. Evil and suffering are seen as necessary conditions for human moral and spiritual development. In this view, God allows evil not as a punishment for sin, but as a means for humanity to grow into greater virtue and likeness to God. Sin here is still a reality, but the context for its existence is more teleological – serving a purpose in the grand scheme of human maturation.

Other Theological Perspectives

  • Process Theology: Suggests that God is not omnipotent in a classical sense but is rather a persuasive influence within a constantly evolving universe. God experiences and suffers with creation, working to maximize good but not unilaterally controlling all events. Evil is inherent in the creative process and the struggle towards greater complexity.
  • Limited God Theodicies: Some approaches propose that God's power is inherently limited, perhaps by the nature of creation itself or by a commitment to free will so profound that even God does not override it. This challenges classical definitions of omnipotence.

The Uncomfortable Questions: Challenges to the Sin-Based Theodicy

While Sin provides a powerful theological explanation, it is not without its critics and inherent challenges.

Natural Evil vs. Moral Evil

The Free Will Defense primarily addresses moral evil. However, how does Sin account for natural disasters, diseases, or the suffering of animals? The Augustinian answer, linking natural evil to the cosmic consequences of Original Sin, often strains credibility for many, particularly in light of scientific understandings of geological and biological processes.

The Suffering of Innocents

Perhaps the most potent challenge is the suffering of those who cannot be held responsible for sin – infants, young children, or animals. If evil is a just consequence of sin, how can innocent beings suffer so profoundly? The doctrine of Original Sin attempts to address this by positing an inherited guilt, but this concept itself is often seen as morally problematic, as it attributes culpability without individual transgression.

Is Sin a Sufficient Explanation?

Even if one accepts Sin as the origin of moral evil, the sheer scale and intensity of suffering often lead to questions about proportionality. Does the misuse of free will truly necessitate all the evil we observe? Could an omnipotent God not have created a world where free will existed without such devastating potential for evil?

Conclusion: The Enduring Dialogue

The Theological Problem of Evil, with Sin as its central explanatory concept, remains one of the most profound and challenging areas of philosophical theology. From Augustine's intricate defense of God's justice to Irenaeus's vision of a soul-making world, thinkers have grappled with reconciling an all-good God with the undeniable reality of Good and Evil.

While Sin offers a powerful narrative within many faith traditions, attributing the origin of evil to human choice, it also opens avenues for further inquiry. The distinction between moral evil and natural evil, the question of innocent suffering, and the ultimate purpose of evil within a divine plan continue to fuel rigorous debate. For anyone engaging with the foundations of faith or the nature of existence, understanding the theological problem of evil and the role of sin is not merely an academic exercise, but a journey into the deepest questions of meaning, responsibility, and the nature of the divine.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Problem of Evil and Free Will Defense Explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Evil and Free Will" OR "Irenaean Theodicy John Hick""

Share this post