The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin): A Paradox of Divine Benevolence

The existence of suffering and moral transgression in a world purportedly created and governed by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfectly good God presents one of the most enduring and profound challenges to theology. This is the classical "Problem of Evil." While evil manifests in many forms – natural disasters, disease, senseless suffering – the most intricate and human-centric facet is moral evil, which theology often encapsulates under the concept of Sin. How can a benevolent God allow, or even permit, the deliberate acts of malice, cruelty, and defiance that define Sin? This pillar page will delve into this complex paradox, exploring its historical formulations, the crucial role of human free will, and the theological responses that attempt to reconcile divine perfection with human imperfection.

Defining the Terms: Theology, Evil, and Sin

To grapple with this profound dilemma, we must first establish a clear understanding of its constituent concepts.

What is Theology?

At its core, theology is the systematic study of the divine, religious belief, and the nature of God. It seeks to understand the attributes of God, His relationship with creation, and the implications of divine revelation for human life. Within this framework, the problem of evil becomes an internal challenge, testing the coherence and consistency of theological doctrines.

The Nature of Evil: Distinguishing Its Forms

Philosophers and theologians typically categorize evil into two main types:

  • Natural Evil: This refers to suffering caused by natural events beyond human control, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, diseases, and famines. It raises questions about God's design of the natural world.
  • Moral Evil: This is the suffering and wrongdoing that results from the free choices and actions of moral agents, primarily humans. It includes acts of hatred, violence, deception, and all forms of human cruelty. This category is where Sin finds its primary locus.

Sin as Moral Evil: A Deliberate Transgression

For most Abrahamic traditions, Sin is not merely an unfortunate mistake or an act of ignorance; it is a deliberate transgression against divine law or a willful turning away from God. It implies a moral agent's culpability and responsibility.

  • A Choice: Sin is often understood as an act of free will, where an individual chooses to defy what they know to be good or right, often in pursuit of selfish desires.
  • A Privation: As articulated by St. Augustine in his Confessions and City of God, evil, including Sin, is not a substance created by God. Instead, it is a privation of good – a lack, a corruption, or a turning away from the order God established. Just as darkness is the absence of light, sin is the absence of due order or goodness in a created being.

The Classical Formulation of the Problem of Evil

The intellectual challenge posed by evil is ancient, often attributed to Epicurus, though its precise wording comes from later philosophers. It can be summarized as a trilemma concerning the attributes of God:

Divine Attribute Implication for Evil
Omnipotence God has the power to prevent all evil.
Omnibenevolence God desires to prevent all evil.
**Existence of Evil Evil exists (both natural and moral, including Sin).

The paradox: If God is both willing and able to prevent evil, then why does evil exist? If He is willing but unable, He is not omnipotent. If He is able but unwilling, He is not omnibenevolent. If He is both, then the existence of evil seems inexplicable. This is the heart of the "Problem of Evil" as it pertains to Theology.

Sin and Free Will: The Augustinian Theodicy

One of the most influential responses to the problem of moral evil, deeply rooted in the Christian tradition and articulated by St. Augustine of Hippo, centers on the concept of human free will.

The Genesis Narrative and The Fall

The biblical account in Genesis provides the foundational narrative for the origin of Sin. Adam and Eve, created in paradise, were given free will and chose to disobey God's command, bringing Sin and death into the world. This "Fall" is seen as the prototype of all subsequent human sin.

Augustine's Argument: Free Will as the Source of Sin

Augustine posits that God, in His infinite goodness, created rational beings with free will – the capacity to choose between good and evil. This freedom is a profound gift, essential for genuine love, moral responsibility, and the possibility of earning virtue.

  • Evil Not Created by God: For Augustine, God created all things good. Evil is not a positive entity but a privation or corruption of that good. It stems from the misuse of free will by created beings.
  • The Best Possible World: A world with free creatures capable of choosing God and love, even with the risk of Sin, is arguably better than a world populated by automatons incapable of genuine moral choice. The potential for love and virtue outweighs the risk of Sin.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, moments after eating the forbidden fruit, with expressions of dawning shame and fear, while a serpent subtly recoils in the background. The lush, vibrant garden contrasts with their sudden vulnerability.)

Critiques of the Free Will Defense

While compelling, the free will defense faces its own challenges:

  • Could God have created beings who always freely choose good? If God is omnipotent, why couldn't He have designed free agents who, by their very nature, would never choose to sin?
  • Divine Responsibility for Creation: If God knew humans would sin when He created them with free will, does He bear ultimate responsibility for the existence of sin?

Thomistic Perspectives on Sin and Divine Providence

St. Thomas Aquinas, building upon Augustinian thought and integrating Aristotelian philosophy in his Summa Theologica, further refined the theological understanding of Sin and its relation to divine providence.

Sin as a Disorder

Aquinas views Sin as a "disordered act" – a deviation from the natural and divine order of things. It is a turning away from the ultimate good (God) towards a lesser, temporal good, chosen in a disordered manner.

  • Reason and Divine Law: Sin is a failure of human reason to align with divine law, which reflects God's eternal wisdom. When we sin, we act against our own rational nature and the purpose for which we were created.

Divine Permission of Evil

Aquinas argues that God does not directly will Sin or evil, as this would contradict His omnibenevolence. However, God permits evil. This permission is not an endorsement but a recognition that:

  • Greater Good from Evil: God, in His infinite wisdom, can bring good out of evil. The existence of Sin allows for the demonstration of divine mercy, forgiveness, and the redemptive power of Christ. It also provides opportunities for human virtue, such as patience, compassion, and courage in the face of adversity.
  • Maintaining Free Will: To prevent all acts of Sin would necessitate removing human free will, which Aquinas, like Augustine, considers a precious gift.

Beyond Individual Sin: Original Sin and its Implications

The concept of Original Sin – the idea that humanity inherits a fallen nature or a propensity to sin from the first parents – adds another layer of complexity to the problem of moral evil.

The Concept of Original Sin

Rooted in the Genesis narrative and profoundly developed by Augustine, Original Sin suggests that Adam and Eve's first transgression had consequences that extend to all their descendants. This inherited condition manifests as a weakened will, a darkened intellect, and a predisposition towards Sin.

Justice and Inheritance

This concept raises significant questions about divine justice:

  • Is it just for all humanity to suffer the consequences, including spiritual death and a propensity to sin, for the actions of two individuals?
  • How can God be considered just if He holds individuals accountable for a condition they did not personally choose?

Theology responds by emphasizing that while humanity inherits a fallen nature, individual salvation is still offered through divine grace and redemption, particularly through the sacrifice of Christ. The concept highlights humanity's profound need for a savior.

Conclusion: The Enduring Paradox

The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin) remains one of the most intellectually rigorous and emotionally poignant challenges to faith. It forces us to confront the deepest questions about the nature of God, human freedom, and the very fabric of existence. From the philosophical foundations laid by Plato and Aristotle, through the profound theological insights of Augustine and Aquinas in the Great Books of the Western World, the discourse has consistently sought to reconcile the undeniable reality of Sin with the core attributes of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

While definitive, universally accepted answers remain elusive, the journey of grappling with this problem enriches our understanding of Theology, ethics, and the human condition. It underscores the preciousness of free will, the tragic consequences of its misuse, and the enduring hope for redemption that lies at the heart of many religious traditions. The paradox of Good and Evil in a divine creation is not merely an academic exercise; it is a profound reflection on the meaning of life itself.

Suggested Resources

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine Problem of Evil Free Will""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aquinas Theodicy Sin""

Share this post