The Theological Problem of Evil: Wrestling with the Shadow of Sin

Few questions have gnawed at the human spirit and challenged the foundations of faith quite like the theological problem of evil. At its core, this profound philosophical and religious dilemma asks: How can an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God permit the existence of evil? When we narrow our focus to sin – that moral evil originating from human will – the problem sharpens, demanding a rigorous examination of divine attributes, human freedom, and the very nature of reality. This pillar page delves into the intricate arguments and timeless responses to this enduring paradox, drawing deeply from the intellectual currents of the Great Books of the Western World.

Defining the Contours: Theology, Sin, Good and Evil, God

To navigate this complex terrain, we must first establish a common vocabulary. The problem of evil, particularly concerning sin, is fundamentally a theological inquiry, meaning it operates within the framework of religious belief concerning God and divine revelation.

  • Theology: The systematic study of the nature of God and religious belief. Here, it seeks to understand God's relationship to His creation, especially in light of moral failings.
  • Sin: A central concept across many religions, sin is generally understood as a transgression against divine law or a willful alienation from God. It is not merely a mistake but a moral failing, often rooted in pride, disobedience, or a turning away from the good. The theological problem of evil often distinguishes between natural evil (suffering from natural disasters) and moral evil (suffering caused by human actions, i.e., sin).
  • Good and Evil: Philosophically, good is often associated with perfection, order, and being, while evil is seen as a privation, disorder, or corruption of the good. Theologically, good is ultimately derived from God, who is the supreme Good. Evil, then, becomes a deviation from God's intended order.
  • God: The divine being whose attributes are crucial to the problem. The classical understanding posits God as:
    • Omnipotent: All-powerful, capable of doing anything logically possible.
    • Omniscient: All-knowing, aware of all past, present, and future events, including human choices.
    • Omnibenevolent: All-good, perfectly loving and just.

The paradox emerges when these attributes are held simultaneously with the undeniable reality of sin. If God is all-good, He would want to prevent sin. If He is all-powerful, He could prevent sin. If He is all-knowing, He knows when sin occurs and could intervene. Yet, sin persists.

Voices from the Canon: Augustine, Aquinas, and the Nature of Sin

The Great Books of the Western World offer profound insights into this theological quandary, with Saint Augustine of Hippo and Saint Thomas Aquinas standing as monumental figures.

Augustine of Hippo: The Privation of Good and the Free Will Defense

Few thinkers have grappled with the problem of evil more intensely than Augustine of Hippo. His personal journey, chronicled in his Confessions (a cornerstone of the GBWW), involved a deep struggle with Manichaeism, which posited two co-eternal powers of good and evil. Augustine ultimately rejected this dualism, articulating a view that has shaped Western theology for centuries.

For Augustine, evil is not a positive substance or a creative force opposing God. Instead, he famously argued for evil as a privation boni – a privation of good, a lack, or a corruption of what is inherently good. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence or distortion of goodness. Sin, therefore, is not something God created; it is a turning away from God, the ultimate Good, by a created will.

Key Augustinian Tenets on Sin:

  • Origin: Sin originated with the free choice of angels and then Adam and Eve, who, though created good, possessed the capacity to choose otherwise.
  • Free Will: God granted humanity free will, a tremendous gift that allows for genuine love and moral agency. However, this freedom inherently carries the risk of choosing evil. Augustine's free will defense posits that God allows sin because the world with free creatures, even with their capacity for sin, is better than a world without free creatures.
  • Original Sin: Through Adam's transgression, humanity inherited a corrupted nature, a propensity to sin that makes it incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to avoid sin without divine grace. This concept, extensively explored in The City of God, explains why sin is so pervasive.

Thomas Aquinas: Permitting Evil for a Greater Good

Building upon Augustine's foundations, Thomas Aquinas, in his monumental Summa Theologica (another essential GBWW text), further refined the theological understanding of evil and sin. Aquinas agreed with Augustine that evil is a privation, not a positive being. He also upheld the necessity of free will.

Aquinas's contribution often centers on the idea of God permitting evil for the sake of a greater good. He argued that God, in His infinite wisdom, does not directly will evil, but He permits it because He can bring forth good even from evil.

Aquinas's Nuances on God and Evil:

  • God's Providence: God's providence extends to all things, including the actions of free creatures. He knows what choices they will make.
  • Order of the Universe: For the perfection and diversity of the universe, it is necessary that not all things be perfect. Some things must be less perfect, and the very existence of rational creatures with free will implies the possibility of their falling short.
  • Greater Good: God's permission of evil is always ordered towards some greater good that humans may not fully comprehend. For instance, the existence of sin allows for the manifestation of God's mercy and justice, and for the possibility of redemption. This aligns with the biblical narrative, also found in GBWW, where suffering (like Job's) or even human sin can ultimately serve a divine purpose that transcends human understanding.

(Image: A classical depiction of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, with the serpent subtly coiled around the Tree of Knowledge, its fruit gleaming. The expressions on Adam and Eve's faces convey a mix of curiosity, temptation, and nascent apprehension, capturing the pivotal moment of the first sin and the exercise of free will.)

Theodicies: Reconciling God's Goodness with Sin

The attempts to reconcile God's attributes with the existence of evil are known as theodicies. Here are some prominent approaches, many of which draw their philosophical lineage from Augustine and Aquinas:

1. The Free Will Defense

  • Core Argument: God values genuine love and moral agency, which are only possible if creatures have the freedom to choose good or evil. To create a world where creatures could not sin would be to create a world without true freedom, and thus without the capacity for genuine moral good. Sin is the regrettable but necessary byproduct of this invaluable gift.
  • Implication: God does not cause sin, but permits it as a consequence of human freedom.

2. The Privation of Good (Augustinian Theodicy)

  • Core Argument: Evil is not a created entity but a lack or corruption of good. God creates only good things. Sin, as a moral evil, is a defect in the will, a turning away from the perfect good. Therefore, God is not responsible for creating evil, but rather for creating the good that is then corrupted.
  • Implication: God's creation remains good, and evil is a parasitic non-entity.

3. The Greater Good Theodicy (Thomistic Influences)

  • Core Argument: God permits evil, including sin, because He can bring about a greater good from it, or because it is necessary for the overall perfection and order of the universe. This greater good might be the development of virtues (patience, compassion), the demonstration of divine mercy and justice, or a deeper appreciation for goodness.
  • Implication: While sin is bad, God's ultimate plan is still good, and He uses even human failings to achieve His purposes.

4. Soul-Making Theodicy (Irenaean, though not directly Augustine/Aquinas)

  • Core Argument: This view, often associated with Irenaeus (an early Church Father) and later John Hick, suggests that the world, with its challenges and temptations (including the possibility of sin), is a "soul-making" environment. It provides the necessary conditions for humans to develop into mature, virtuous beings through overcoming adversity and making free, morally significant choices.
  • Implication: Sin and suffering, while regrettable, serve a developmental purpose, allowing for the growth of character and spiritual maturity.

Enduring Challenges and Modern Perspectives

Despite the robust theological frameworks provided by figures like Augustine and Aquinas, the problem of evil, particularly the shadow cast by sin, remains a potent challenge. Critics often raise questions such as:

  • The Problem of Scale: Does the immense suffering caused by sin truly justify the gift of free will, even if it leads to a "greater good"?
  • Divine Foreknowledge vs. Free Will: If God is omniscient and knows every choice we will make, how can our choices be truly free, and why would He create beings He knows will choose evil?
  • The Nature of Grace: If humanity is so corrupted by original sin that it cannot help but sin, does this diminish human responsibility, or does it necessitate an overwhelming divine intervention (grace) that still seems to leave many in sin?

These questions continue to fuel philosophical and theological discourse, prompting new interpretations and criticisms of traditional theodicies. The debate underscores the profound mystery inherent in God's relationship with a world riddled with moral imperfection.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""The Problem of Evil Philosophy Explained" and "Augustine on Sin and Free Will""

Conclusion: A Perennial Question for Faith and Reason

The theological problem of evil, specifically concerning the pervasive reality of sin, stands as one of the most intellectually demanding and spiritually poignant questions in human history. From the foundational texts of the Great Books of the Western World, we learn that thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas wrestled with this paradox, offering profound insights into the nature of God, Good and Evil, and human Theology.

Their responses, centered on the concepts of evil as a privation, the indispensable gift of free will, and God's capacity to bring a greater good from suffering, provide enduring frameworks for understanding. While no single answer fully resolves the mystery for every individual, the ongoing engagement with this problem enriches our understanding of faith, morality, and the human condition. It reminds us that the quest for meaning often leads us to the very edges of our comprehension, where reason meets revelation in a continuous, challenging dialogue.

Share this post