The Theological Problem of Evil: Confronting Sin in a World Created by God

The existence of suffering and moral depravity in a world supposedly crafted by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God presents one of the most profound and enduring challenges to Theology. This is the classic "Problem of Evil," a philosophical and theological conundrum that has vexed thinkers for millennia. At its heart, when viewed through a theological lens, is the concept of Sin. How can a perfectly benevolent God allow, or even permit the possibility of, such a pervasive force as Sin to corrupt His creation? This pillar page delves into the theological dimensions of this problem, exploring how the concept of Sin is both a core aspect of the dilemma and a central component of its proposed resolutions within the framework of faith. We will journey through the arguments and insights of the Great Books of the Western World, seeking to understand the intricate relationship between God, Good and Evil, and the human phenomenon of Sin.

Defining the Divine Dilemma: God, Good, and the Shadow of Sin

The problem is often framed as a logical inconsistency:

  1. If God is omnipotent (all-powerful), He has the power to prevent all evil.
  2. If God is omnibenevolent (all-good), He desires to prevent all evil.
  3. If God is omniscient (all-knowing), He knows how to prevent all evil.
  4. Evil (including Sin) exists.
  5. Therefore, a God with all these attributes cannot exist, or at least, one of these attributes must be false.

However, theological responses, known as theodicies, seek to reconcile God's attributes with the reality of Good and Evil. Central to many of these is the concept of Sin.

What is Evil? What is Sin?

Before proceeding, let us clarify our terms:

  • Evil: In philosophical and theological contexts, evil is not merely suffering, but a broader concept encompassing moral wrongdoing (e.g., murder, hatred) and natural calamities (e.g., earthquakes, disease). Theologically, evil is often understood as a privation of good, a lack or corruption of what ought to be. As St. Augustine famously argued, evil is not a substance created by God, but rather a turning away from God, who is the ultimate Good.
  • Sin: Sin is a specific type of evil, inherently moral in nature. It is a willful transgression against divine law or a deliberate turning away from God. It implies culpability and choice. While natural evils are not a result of human Sin directly (though some theological traditions link them to the Fall), moral evils are universally attributed to Sin.

The Genesis of Sin: Classical Perspectives from the Great Books

The origins and nature of Sin have been a cornerstone of theological inquiry for millennia.

Augustine of Hippo: The Privation and the Fall

One of the most influential voices on the Problem of Evil, particularly regarding Sin, is St. Augustine (from Confessions and City of God). He meticulously argued that God did not create evil. Instead, evil is a privatio boni – a privation or absence of Good. Imagine light and darkness: darkness is not a positive entity, but merely the absence of light. Similarly, evil is the absence or corruption of Good.

Augustine attributed the origin of Sin to the free will of rational creatures (angels and humans). God created humanity with free will, a profound gift that allows for genuine love, obedience, and moral choice. However, this gift also carries the inherent risk of choosing against God. The story of the Fall of Man (Adam and Eve) in Genesis is the foundational narrative for Christian Theology concerning the origin of Sin. Their choice to disobey God was a radical turning away from the ultimate Good, introducing Sin and its consequences into the world.

  • Key Augustinian Tenets on Sin:
    • Sin is not inherent in creation but a corruption of Good.
    • It originated from the misuse of free will by rational beings.
    • Humanity's fallen state (Original Sin) means we are predisposed to Sin.
    • God allows evil not because He wills it, but because He can bring a greater Good out of it (e.g., the demonstration of His justice, mercy, and the possibility of redemption).

Thomas Aquinas: God's Permissive Will and Providence

Building upon Augustine, Thomas Aquinas (from Summa Theologica) further elaborated on God's relationship to Sin. Aquinas affirmed that God does not cause Sin; rather, Sin arises from the defect of a secondary cause (i.e., human free will). God permits evil, not because He approves of it, but because His providence is so vast and intricate that He can draw Good even from evil.

For Aquinas, God's permissive will is crucial. He allows for the possibility of Sin because it is a necessary condition for genuine moral freedom. A world where moral agents could not choose Good and Evil would be a world without true virtue, love, or merit.

The Book of Job: Suffering, Justice, and Divine Incomprehensibility

While not directly a treatise on the origin of Sin, the Book of Job (from the Old Testament) profoundly grapples with the Problem of Evil from a human perspective. Job, a righteous man, suffers immensely despite his innocence, challenging the simplistic notion that suffering is always a direct punishment for Sin.

The narrative of Job highlights:

  • The limits of human understanding concerning divine justice.
  • The sovereignty of God over all creation, even suffering.
  • That God's reasons for permitting evil may transcend human comprehension, yet His ultimate Goodness remains.

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, moments after eating the forbidden fruit, with expressions of dawning shame and fear, a serpent subtly receding into the background, symbolizing the origin of sin and humanity's fall from grace.)

Theodical Responses: Reconciling God's Attributes with Sin

Theological attempts to reconcile God's perfect nature with the existence of Sin are known as theodicies.

1. The Free Will Defense

This is arguably the most common and robust theological response to the Problem of Evil, particularly concerning moral evil (Sin).

  • Core Argument: God created humanity with genuine free will because a world containing free moral agents capable of choosing Good (and thereby loving God freely) is intrinsically more valuable than a world of automata programmed to do only Good. For free will to be meaningful, the choice to do evil (to Sin) must be a real possibility. God, therefore, is not directly responsible for Sin, but for the possibility of Sin as a necessary byproduct of the greater Good of free will.
  • Implications for Sin: Sin is seen as a tragic but unavoidable consequence of human freedom. God values our genuine choice over coerced obedience.
  • Critiques and Responses: Critics ask if God could have created free beings who always choose the Good. Theists often respond that such beings would not be truly free in the sense intended, or that it would be logically impossible for God to create genuinely free beings who could not Sin.

2. The Soul-Making Theodicy (Irenaean Theodicy)

Developed by figures like Irenaeus and later by John Hick, this theodicy suggests that the world, with its challenges, suffering, and the possibility of Sin, is a "soul-making" environment necessary for human moral and spiritual development.

  • Core Argument: Humans are not created perfect but in God's "image," with the potential to grow into His "likeness." A world devoid of challenges, moral choices, and the consequences of Sin would be a moral playground, not a place where virtues like courage, compassion, and perseverance could be forged. The struggle against Sin (both personal and societal) and the redemption offered by God are crucial for genuine spiritual growth.
  • Implications for Sin: Sin serves as a catalyst for moral and spiritual development. Overcoming Sin and striving for Good through free choice is what makes humans morally significant.
  • Relationship to Free Will: This theodicy often complements the Free Will Defense, suggesting that not only is free will necessary for Good, but the exercise of that freedom in a challenging world is essential for spiritual maturity.

3. The Augustinian Theodicy (Revisited)

While not a distinct category from the Free Will Defense, the Augustinian approach emphasizes the perfect original creation and the subsequent corruption through Sin.

  • Core Argument: God's initial creation was perfectly Good. Evil, including Sin, entered the world through the free choice of humanity, thereby corrupting the natural order. God then, through His providence, works to redeem this fallen creation. The suffering we experience (natural and moral) is a consequence of this fallen state, but God uses even this to demonstrate His ultimate power and Goodness through redemption and salvation.
  • Implications for Sin: Sin is the direct cause of the brokenness of the world. God's response to Sin is not merely to punish, but to offer a path to reconciliation and restoration.

The Enduring Significance of Sin in Theology

The concept of Sin is not merely an explanation for evil; it is fundamental to understanding theological narratives of redemption and salvation.

  • The Problem of Original Sin: The doctrine of Original Sin posits that humanity inherited a fallen nature from Adam and Eve, predisposing us to Sin. This deepens the Problem of Evil by suggesting that humanity is not born into a neutral state but one already tainted. Theologically, this highlights the profound need for divine grace and intervention.
  • Sin as Separation from God: Ultimately, Sin is understood as a rupture in the relationship between humanity and God. It is a turning away from the source of all Good, leading to spiritual death and alienation.
  • The Necessity of Redemption: If Sin is a real and pervasive force, then Theology must offer a solution. This is where concepts like atonement, forgiveness, and divine grace become paramount, offering a path to overcome Sin and restore the relationship with God.

YouTube: "Problem of Evil Free Will Defense Explained"
YouTube: "Augustine on Evil and Free Will"

Conclusion: The Unfolding Dialogue of Good, Evil, and God

The theological problem of evil, particularly as it relates to Sin, remains one of the most intellectually demanding and spiritually challenging areas of inquiry. From the classical insights of Augustine and Aquinas, who meticulously defined Sin as a privation of Good stemming from free will, to the profound questioning of Job, humanity has continually sought to reconcile the existence of suffering and moral depravity with the belief in a perfectly Good and powerful God.

Theodicies, primarily the Free Will Defense and Soul-Making Theodicy, offer frameworks to understand God's allowance of Sin not as an endorsement, but as a consequence of His greater purposes – whether for genuine love, moral freedom, or the development of character. While no single answer fully eradicates the mystery, Theology provides a rich tapestry of thought that positions Sin not as a flaw in God's design, but as a tragic yet ultimately redeemable aspect of the human condition, underscoring the profound drama of Good and Evil and the enduring quest for God's grace. The conversation continues, inviting each generation to grapple with these eternal questions.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin) philosophy"

Share this post