The Theological Problem of Evil: Wrestling with Sin in a World Made by God

The existence of evil has long been the most formidable intellectual challenge to belief in an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God. This is the essence of the "problem of evil." But when we narrow our focus to moral evil—that is, sin—the theological conundrum takes on a particularly sharp edge. How can a benevolent God allow, or even ordain, a universe where humanity is seemingly prone to transgression, rebellion, and moral failing? This pillar page delves into the theological problem of evil as it pertains specifically to sin, exploring its historical interpretations, philosophical defenses, and the enduring questions it poses to faith and reason. We will navigate the labyrinthine arguments that attempt to reconcile divine omnipotence and omnibenevolence with the stark reality of human wrongdoing, drawing insights from the foundational texts that have shaped Western thought.

Unpacking the Paradox: God, Sin, and the Good and Evil Divide

At its heart, the theological problem of evil, particularly concerning sin, is a logical dilemma:

  1. God is omnipotent (all-powerful).
  2. God is omnibenevolent (all-good).
  3. God is omniscient (all-knowing).
  4. Evil (including sin) exists.

If God is all-powerful, He could prevent evil. If He is all-good, He would want to prevent evil. If He is all-knowing, He would know how to prevent evil. Yet, sin — the quintessential moral evil — pervades human existence. This forms a profound tension, forcing theologians and philosophers to either redefine God's attributes, reinterpret the nature of evil, or accept a profound mystery.

Defining Our Terms: Core Concepts

To grapple with this problem, we must first establish a common understanding of its central components:

  • Theological Problem of Evil: The intellectual difficulty of reconciling the existence of evil with the existence of a God who is traditionally conceived as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent.
  • Sin: From a theological perspective, sin is not merely a mistake or an error, but a transgression against divine law or a rebellion against God's will. It often implies a deliberate choice to turn away from Good and Evil, or a failure to live up to a divinely ordained standard. It can be understood as:
    • Transgression: Breaking a specific commandment.
    • Rebellion: An act of defiance against divine authority.
    • Privation of Good: (Augustine) Not a substance in itself, but an absence or distortion of the good that should be present.
  • Good and Evil: These terms, often presented as binary opposites, represent the moral landscape within which sin is defined. Good is often aligned with God's nature and will, while evil is a deviation from it.
  • God: The supreme being, creator, and sustainer of the universe, possessing perfect attributes of power, knowledge, and goodness, as understood in monotheistic theology.
  • Free Will: The capacity of moral agents to make choices that are genuinely their own, uncoerced by external forces, especially divine predetermination. This concept is central to many theological defenses against the problem of sin.

A Historical Trajectory: From Ancient Ethics to Christian Theology

The question of why humans do bad things is as old as philosophy itself. However, the specific theological problem of sin emerges most prominently with the advent of monotheistic religions, particularly Christianity, where the concept of a personal, morally perfect God is paramount.

Early Philosophical Stirrings

Even before the full articulation of Christian theology, Greek philosophers grappled with moral failing. Plato and Aristotle, featured prominently in the Great Books of the Western World, explored vice, moral weakness (akrasia), and the pursuit of the good life. For them, moral failings were often rooted in ignorance or a lack of proper training, rather than a direct transgression against a divine, personal will.

Augustine and the Genesis of Sin

It is with St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), whose Confessions and City of God are cornerstones of the Great Books, that the Christian understanding of sin truly solidifies and directly confronts the problem of evil. Augustine famously argued:

  • Sin as Privation (Privatio Boni): Evil is not a positive substance created by God, but rather a privation or absence of good. Just as darkness is the absence of light, sin is the absence or corruption of the good that God intended. This absolves God from being the direct creator of evil.
  • Original Sin: Augustine posited that humanity inherits a corrupted nature from Adam's first disobedience. This "original sin" predisposes humans to sin, explaining its pervasive nature.
  • Free Will Defense: Crucially, Augustine argued that sin originates from the misuse of human free will. God, in His goodness, granted humanity free will, a greater good than a world where beings were compelled to be righteous. The capacity to choose good necessarily entails the capacity to choose evil. Thus, sin is a consequence of human freedom, not a divine flaw.

Scholasticism and the Systematization of Sin

Centuries later, Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274 CE), whose Summa Theologica is another monumental work in the Great Books, further refined the understanding of sin. Integrating Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology, Aquinas viewed sin as:

  • Deviation from Reason and Divine Law: Sin is fundamentally a disordered act, a turning away from the ultimate good (God) and a pursuit of lesser, created goods in a disordered manner. It is a violation of both natural law (accessible by reason) and divine positive law (revealed by God).
  • Voluntary Act: Aquinas emphasized the voluntary nature of sin, distinguishing between mortal and venial sins based on the gravity of the matter and the deliberateness of the will.

Major Theological Responses: Theodicy and the Justification of God

The ongoing attempt to reconcile God's attributes with the existence of sin and suffering is known as theodicy. Several key approaches have emerged:

1. The Free Will Defense

As championed by Augustine, this remains the most prominent response to the problem of sin.

  • Core Argument: A world with genuinely free moral agents, capable of choosing good (and thus also evil), is superior to a world where beings are programmed to be righteous. God values free love and obedience over robotic compliance.
  • Implication: Sin is not God's direct creation but an unfortunate, albeit necessary, byproduct of the gift of free will. God permits sin for the sake of a greater good (human freedom and genuine relationship).

2. The Soul-Making Theodicy (Irenaean Theodicy)

While Irenaeus (c. 130-202 CE) laid early groundwork, this approach was significantly developed in modern theology (e.g., John Hick). However, its roots touch upon the idea of a developing humanity.

  • Core Argument: The world, including its challenges and the potential for sin, is a "soul-making" environment. Evil (including the consequences of sin) is necessary for human moral and spiritual development. Without real challenges, suffering, and the opportunity to overcome temptation, virtues like courage, compassion, and perseverance could not truly develop.
  • Implication: God allows sin and its effects not as punishment, but as a crucible for character formation, leading humanity towards a greater good.

3. The Best of All Possible Worlds (Leibniz)

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716 CE), another luminary in the Great Books, proposed in his Theodicy that this universe, despite its imperfections and the presence of sin, is the "best of all possible worlds."

  • Core Argument: God, being supremely rational and good, would only create the most perfect world possible. The existence of sin and suffering, while lamentable, is necessary for some greater, incomprehensible cosmic harmony or a greater overall good that outweighs the individual evils.
  • Implication: Our limited human perspective cannot grasp the totality of God's plan, and what appears as evil to us might be a necessary component of a greater good in the grand divine scheme.

4. Sin as a Mystery / Divine Inscrutability

Some theological positions acknowledge the profound difficulty and ultimately rest on the mystery of God's ways.

  • Core Argument: Human reason is finite and cannot fully comprehend the infinite wisdom and purposes of God. To demand a complete rational explanation for sin and suffering is to place human intellect above divine understanding.
  • Implication: While we strive to understand, ultimate answers may lie beyond our grasp, requiring faith and trust in God's ultimate goodness and justice, even in the face of apparent contradictions.

The Enduring Impact: Sin, Responsibility, and Redemption

The theological problem of sin is not merely an academic exercise; it has profound implications for how we understand ourselves, our relationship with the divine, and our place in the moral universe.

Moral Responsibility

The concept of sin inherently ties into human moral responsibility. If sin is a choice, then individuals are accountable for their actions. This forms the basis for ethics, justice systems, and the very idea of moral progress or regress.

The Need for Redemption

For many theologies, the pervasive reality of sin necessitates a concept of redemption or salvation. If humanity is truly fallen or prone to transgression, then a divine intervention or path to reconciliation is often posited as the ultimate solution to the problem sin poses. This moves the discussion from simply explaining sin's existence to addressing its consequences.

Faith and Doubt

For believers, the problem of sin can be a source of profound doubt, challenging their understanding of God's character. For others, confronting this problem strengthens faith, leading to a deeper appreciation of God's grace, patience, and the value of human freedom.

Further Exploration: Beyond Sin

The theological problem of evil extends beyond moral evil (sin) to encompass other forms:

  • Natural Evil: Suffering caused by natural phenomena (earthquakes, diseases, tsunamis) that are not the direct result of human actions.
  • Metaphysical Evil: The inherent imperfections or limitations of a created world compared to the perfection of God.

Understanding sin is a crucial piece of this larger puzzle, often serving as the gateway to grappling with the full spectrum of evil in a God-created universe.

Conclusion: The Unfolding Dialogue

The theological problem of evil, specifically as it pertains to sin, remains one of the most persistent and intellectually fertile grounds in philosophy and theology. From Augustine's profound insights into free will and privation to Aquinas's systematic rationalizations, and Leibniz's audacious theodicy, thinkers throughout history, as chronicled in the Great Books of the Western World, have wrestled with this fundamental tension.

There is no single, universally accepted solution, nor perhaps should there be. The ongoing dialogue reflects humanity's ceaseless quest to understand its own moral failings in the context of a divine creator. It forces us to confront the nature of good and evil, the meaning of human freedom, and the very character of God. As Benjamin Richmond often muses, perhaps the true wisdom lies not in finding a definitive answer, but in the courage to continually ask the difficult questions, allowing them to refine our understanding of faith, reason, and the intricate tapestry of existence.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting Adam and Eve after their expulsion from the Garden of Eden, showing their faces etched with sorrow and regret, looking back at the closed gates while an angel with a flaming sword stands guard. The scene conveys profound loss and the immediate consequences of original sin.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Evil and Free Will""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""The Problem of Evil: Crash Course Philosophy #13""

Share this post