The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin): Reconciling Divine Goodness with Human Transgression

The existence of suffering and moral wrongdoing in a world supposedly created and governed by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God presents one of the most enduring and profound challenges in Theology and philosophy alike. This is the heart of the Theological Problem of Evil. When we narrow our focus specifically to sin—human transgression against divine law—the problem intensifies, demanding an explanation for why a perfectly benevolent God would permit, or seemingly even create the conditions for, such a fundamental affront to divine will. This pillar page delves into this intricate dilemma, exploring how classical thinkers, particularly those within the canon of the Great Books of the Western World, have grappled with the origins, nature, and implications of sin in relation to God's perfect attributes and the broader concepts of Good and Evil.

Understanding the Core Dilemma: God, Good, and Evil

At its essence, the Theological Problem of Evil concerning sin can be summarized as a logical inconsistency arising from three propositions, often referred to as the "inconsistent triad":

  1. God is omnipotent (all-powerful).
  2. God is omnibenevolent (all-good).
  3. Evil (including sin) exists.

If God is all-powerful, He could prevent evil and sin. If God is all-good, He would want to prevent evil and sin. Yet, evil and sin manifestly exist. This apparent contradiction forces theologians and philosophers to either deny one of the propositions, redefine the terms, or offer a theodicy—an attempt to justify God's ways in the face of evil. Our focus here is specifically on sin, which is a moral evil, distinct from natural evils (like earthquakes or disease). Sin implies a deliberate turning away from God, a personal culpability that raises unique theological questions.

The Attributes of God and the Challenge of Sin

The classical understanding of God within Western Theology ascribes to Him several perfect attributes that make the problem of sin particularly acute:

  • Omnipotence: God has the power to do anything logically possible. This suggests God could simply eliminate sin.
  • Omnibenevolence: God is perfectly good and desires the good for His creation. This implies God would not want sin to exist.
  • Omniscience: God knows everything, including all future events and consequences. This means God would have known that sin would arise from creation.

Given these attributes, the existence of sin—a direct affront to God's will and goodness—becomes a central paradox, challenging humanity's understanding of divine justice, mercy, and sovereignty.

The Nature of Sin: A Theological Perspective

Before addressing the problem, it is crucial to define sin from a theological standpoint. Unlike philosophical concepts of moral wrong, sin is fundamentally understood as an offense against God.

Defining Sin: Transgression and Separation

In Abrahamic religions, sin is typically characterized as:

  • Transgression of Divine Law: A violation of God's commandments and statutes (e.g., the Ten Commandments).
  • Rebellion Against God: An act of defiance or disobedience, choosing one's own will over God's.
  • Missing the Mark: A failure to live up to God's perfect standard of righteousness.
  • Separation from God: The spiritual consequence of sin, leading to estrangement from divine presence and goodness.

The concept of Original Sin, stemming from the biblical account of Adam and Eve's disobedience in the Garden of Eden, is particularly significant. It posits that humanity inherits a fallen nature, a propensity towards sin, which complicates the idea of individual culpability and God's justice. This inherited condition means that sin is not just an individual act but a pervasive human predicament.

(Image: A detailed depiction of Adam and Eve standing beneath the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, with a serpent entwined around its branches, their expressions conveying a dawning awareness and regret, set against a backdrop of the lush, yet now subtly fading, Garden of Eden.)

Historical Trajectories from the Great Books: Grappling with Sin

The Great Books of the Western World offer profound insights into how various thinkers have attempted to reconcile God's nature with the reality of sin.

Augustine of Hippo and the Privation Theory

Perhaps the most influential early Christian theologian to tackle the problem of sin was Augustine of Hippo. In works such as Confessions and City of God, Augustine synthesized biblical teachings with Neoplatonic philosophy to formulate a powerful theodicy.

  • Evil as Privation: Augustine argued that evil (including sin) is not a substance or a created entity, but rather a privation or absence of good. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the corruption or lack of due good in something that is otherwise good. Since God created all things good, evil cannot be attributed to God's direct creation.
  • Free Will Defense: The origin of sin, according to Augustine, lies in the misuse of free will by rational creatures (angels and humans). God, in His infinite goodness, bestowed upon humanity the gift of free will, allowing them the genuine choice to turn towards or away from Him. Sin is thus a deliberate turning away from the higher good (God) towards a lesser good (self-love, worldly desires).
  • Original Sin: Augustine famously articulated the doctrine of Original Sin, asserting that Adam's first sin corrupted human nature, transmitting a hereditary guilt and propensity to sin to all subsequent generations. This explains why sin is so pervasive and why humans seem predisposed to moral failing, even if God is perfectly good.

Thomas Aquinas and Scholastic Refinements

Centuries later, Thomas Aquinas, drawing heavily on Aristotelian philosophy and Augustinian insights, further refined the theological understanding of sin in his Summa Theologica.

  • Sin as a Disordered Act: Aquinas agreed with Augustine that evil is a privation. He viewed sin as a voluntary act that lacks its proper order, deviating from right reason and eternal law. It is a defect in the will, choosing a perceived good that is contrary to the true good as defined by God.
  • God's Permissive Will: Aquinas distinguished between God's active will (what God directly wills to happen) and His permissive will (what God allows to happen, though He does not desire it). God permits sin not because He desires it, but because He wills a greater good that would be impossible without the possibility of sin—namely, the existence of free creatures.
  • Divine Providence and Secondary Causes: Aquinas maintained that God's providence governs all things, but He often works through secondary causes. Human free will is a secondary cause, and God's allowing humans to act freely (and thus to sin) is part of His larger, inscrutable plan, ultimately aimed at good.

Major Theodicies Addressing Sin

Beyond the foundational work of Augustine and Aquinas, various theodicies have been proposed to address the problem of sin, often building upon or critiquing these earlier frameworks.

The Free Will Defense

The Free Will Defense is arguably the most common and robust theological response to the problem of sin. It posits that:

  • The Value of Genuine Freedom: A world with genuinely free moral agents, capable of choosing good and loving God willingly, is inherently more valuable than a world populated by automatons who are incapable of sin but also incapable of true virtue or love.
  • The Necessity of Choice: For freedom to be meaningful, the choice to do evil (to sin) must be a real possibility. God could not create free creatures who always choose the good without negating their freedom.
  • God's Non-Coercion: God respects human freedom to such an extent that He does not intervene to prevent every instance of sin, even though He has the power to do so. This non-coercion is seen as a sign of God's love and respect for His creation.

Soul-Making Theodicy (Irenaean)

While less directly focused on sin's origin, the Soul-Making Theodicy, often associated with Irenaeus of Lyon (though developed more fully by modern thinkers like John Hick), offers a broader perspective on evil that can encompass sin.

  • Growth and Development: This theodicy suggests that the world, with its challenges, suffering, and the possibility of sin, is designed as an environment for human moral and spiritual growth. Humans are not created perfect but are "in the making" towards a likeness of God.
  • Overcoming Evil: The struggles against sin, both personal and societal, provide opportunities for developing virtues like courage, compassion, perseverance, and faith. Without the possibility of sin and its consequences, humanity would have no opportunity to develop these higher moral qualities.
Theodicy/Concept Primary Explanation for Sin Core Argument Key Thinkers
Augustinian Misuse of free will; privation of good Sin is not God's creation but a defect arising from creaturely freedom, inherited as Original Sin. Augustine
Free Will Defense Necessary consequence of genuine human freedom God permits sin to preserve the greater good of free moral agents capable of true love and virtue. Alvin Plantinga, C.S. Lewis
Soul-Making (Irenaean) Provides opportunities for moral and spiritual growth Sin and suffering are necessary components of a world designed to foster human development and virtue. Irenaeus (foundational), John Hick

The Interplay of Good and Evil: A Divine Tapestry?

The theological problem of sin is not just about explaining its existence but also about understanding its role within God's overarching plan. Many theologians argue that while God does not will sin, He can providentially use its consequences to bring about a greater good.

  • The Necessity of Redemption: The reality of sin underscores the profound need for divine grace, forgiveness, and redemption. Without sin, the concepts of God's mercy, sacrifice (e.g., in Christian Theology, the crucifixion of Christ), and salvation would lose their meaning.
  • Highlighting God's Justice and Love: The existence of sin allows God's attributes of both justice (in judging sin) and boundless love (in offering redemption) to be fully manifest. The drama of Good and Evil played out in human history reveals the depth of God's engagement with His creation.

Conclusion: An Enduring Theological Conundrum

The Theological Problem of Evil, specifically as it pertains to sin, remains one of the most intellectually rigorous and spiritually challenging aspects of religious belief. From the profound insights of Augustine and Aquinas to contemporary discussions, theologians have consistently sought to reconcile the pervasive reality of human transgression with the perfect goodness and power of God.

While no single theodicy fully satisfies every skeptic, the ongoing exploration of sin's origins, its relationship to human freedom, and its place within God's divine plan continues to shape our understanding of God, humanity, and the perennial struggle between Good and Evil. The Great Books of the Western World provide an indispensable foundation for anyone seeking to grapple with this profound and fundamental question, reminding us that the journey of faith and reason is often found in the very questions we dare to ask.

Further Exploration:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine Problem of Evil Free Will""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Aquinas Sin and Evil Explained""

Share this post