The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin): An Enduring Conundrum

The existence of evil in a world supposedly governed by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God presents one of philosophy's most profound and enduring intellectual challenges. Often termed "the problem of evil," this dilemma lies at the heart of much theological and metaphysical inquiry. This pillar page explores the multifaceted nature of this problem, specifically focusing on the role of Sin as a category of evil, examining historical responses, and reflecting on its ongoing implications for our understanding of God, Good and Evil, and human existence itself.

Summary: Grappling with the Paradox

The Theological Problem of Evil, at its core, is the seemingly irreconcilable tension between three propositions: (1) God is omnipotent (all-powerful), (2) God is omnibenevolent (all-good), and (3) Evil exists. If God is all-powerful, He could prevent evil; if He is all-good, He would want to prevent evil. Yet, evil undeniably persists. When we introduce Sin into this equation—as a specific form of moral evil originating from human free will—the problem deepens, compelling us to confront not only divine attributes but also the nature of human responsibility, justice, and suffering. This page navigates this complex landscape, drawing insights from classical Theology and philosophy.

Introduction: The Unsettling Question

For millennia, thinkers have wrestled with the unsettling question: Why do bad things happen if God is good? This isn't merely an academic exercise; it's a deeply personal and existential cry that echoes through human history. From the ancient laments of Job to the sophisticated arguments of modern philosophers, the problem of evil compels us to scrutinize our most fundamental beliefs about the cosmos, divine nature, and human suffering.

The problem crystallizes when we consider the traditional attributes of the Abrahamic God:

  • Omnipotence: God is capable of anything logically possible.
  • Omnibenevolence: God is perfectly good and desires the well-being of His creation.
  • Omniscience: God knows everything, past, present, and future.

If such a God exists, how can evil—be it the suffering caused by natural disasters or the moral depravity of human actions—also exist? This is the core logical challenge, further complicated by the evidential problem of evil, which points to the sheer quantity, intensity, and seemingly gratuitous nature of suffering in the world as evidence against God's existence or His traditional attributes.

Defining the Terms: Theology, Evil, and God

Before we delve into solutions, it's crucial to clarify the concepts at play.

Theology: The Study of God

Theology is more than just religious belief; it is the systematic study of the divine, encompassing doctrines, practices, and experiences related to God or ultimate reality. Within Christian Theology, specifically, the nature of God, His relationship with humanity, and the origin of Good and Evil are central tenets. This intellectual discipline seeks to reconcile faith with reason, often through rigorous philosophical argumentation.

Evil: Its Forms and Manifestations

Evil is not a monolithic concept. Philosophers and theologians typically distinguish between two primary categories:

  1. Moral Evil: This refers to the suffering and wrongdoing that results from the intentional actions or inactions of moral agents (e.g., murder, theft, cruelty, injustice, war).
  2. Natural Evil: This encompasses suffering caused by natural events beyond human control (e.g., earthquakes, tsunamis, diseases, famines).

While both pose challenges to God's attributes, the problem of Sin directly addresses moral evil, placing human free will at the center of the debate.

God: The Classical Theistic Conception

When discussing the problem of evil, the God in question is typically the classical theistic God—a transcendent, personal being who is the creator and sustainer of the universe, possessing the attributes of omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and omniscience. Any proposed solution (theodicy) must contend with these specific divine characteristics.

The Role of Sin in the Problem of Evil

Within Theology, Sin is often presented as the primary origin of moral evil. It is not merely a mistake or an error, but a deliberate transgression against divine law or the will of God.

Sin as a Departure from Goodness

Many theological traditions, notably Augustinian Theology, conceptualize Sin not as a substance or a created entity, but as a privation of good—a turning away from God, who is the ultimate good. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil (and thus sin) is the absence or distortion of good. This idea, deeply rooted in Neoplatonism and articulated powerfully by St. Augustine in works like his Confessions and City of God (found in the Great Books of the Western World collection), suggests that God did not create evil; rather, evil arises when created beings, endowed with free will, choose to deviate from the good for which they were made.

The Free Will Defense

The most common and robust theological response to the problem of moral evil, particularly Sin, is the Free Will Defense. This argument posits that:

  • God values genuine love and moral goodness.
  • Genuine love and moral goodness require free will.
  • To grant creatures free will, God must allow them the possibility of choosing evil as well as good.
  • Therefore, the existence of moral evil (sin) is a necessary byproduct of a greater good: the existence of free moral agents capable of choosing to love God and each other.

This defense, while powerful, often faces critiques regarding its scope. Can all moral evil be attributed to free will? Does it adequately explain the amount or intensity of evil? And what of natural evil?

Original Sin: A Deeper Theological Layer

The concept of Original Sin—the idea that humanity inherited a corrupted nature or guilt from the first human disobedience (Adam and Eve's fall)—further complicates the problem. If all humans are born into a state of sinfulness, does this diminish their free will? Does it make God responsible for their sinful inclinations? Theologians like Augustine argued that while the capacity for sin came from Adam, each individual still chooses to sin, thereby confirming their fallen nature. This doctrine profoundly shapes Christian understanding of human nature, salvation, and the necessity of divine grace.

Historical Responses and Theodicies

The attempt to justify God's ways in the face of evil is known as a theodicy. Throughout history, philosophers and theologians have proposed various solutions, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

Key Theodicies and Their Proponents

Theodicy/Approach Core Argument Key Figures/Sources
Augustinian Theodicy Evil is a privation of good, not a created substance. Moral evil stems from the misuse of free will by angels and humans (the Fall). Natural evil is a consequence of this cosmic disorder. St. Augustine (Confessions, City of God - Great Books of the Western World)
Irenaean/Soul-Making Theodicy The world is not a perfect paradise but a "soul-making" environment where challenges and suffering are necessary for humans to develop moral character and grow into the likeness of God. Irenaeus of Lyons, John Hick (Evil and the God of Love)
Leibniz's "Best of All Possible Worlds" God, being supremely rational, created the best possible world He could. While this world contains evil, any other possible world would contain even more or less overall goodness. G.W. Leibniz (Theodicy - Great Books of the Western World), though often satirized (Voltaire's Candide)
Thomistic (Aquinas) God permits evil for the sake of a greater good, maintaining the order and diversity of the universe. Evil highlights good by contrast. (e.g., predators are part of a natural order). St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologica - Great Books of the Western World)
Mystical/Skeptical Theodicy God's ways are inscrutable to human understanding. We cannot fully comprehend why God permits evil, but we must trust in His ultimate goodness and wisdom. Book of Job, various mystics and fideists

Each of these approaches attempts to reconcile the attributes of God with the reality of Good and Evil, though none has achieved universal acceptance.

Critiques and Persistent Challenges

Despite the ingenuity of various theodicies, the problem of evil continues to challenge Theology.

The Logical vs. Evidential Problem

  • The Logical Problem: Argues that the existence of God and the existence of evil are logically contradictory. Theodicies, especially the Free Will Defense, aim to show that there is no logical contradiction.
  • The Evidential Problem: Argues that while not logically contradictory, the kind and amount of evil we observe in the world make God's existence highly improbable. Why so much seemingly pointless suffering? Why "gratuitous" evil that doesn't seem to serve any greater purpose (like soul-making or free will)?

Philosophers like David Hume and J.L. Mackie have famously pressed these evidential challenges, questioning whether the proposed reasons for evil (like free will) truly justify the immense suffering observed.

The Problem of Gratuitous Evil

This is perhaps the most difficult challenge. If a child suffers excruciating pain from a rare disease and dies, what "greater good" is served? Is it necessary for free will? Does it build character? Many argue that such suffering seems utterly gratuitous, undermining the claim that all evil serves a divine purpose.

Sin and Divine Justice

Another persistent challenge relates to Sin itself. If God is truly omnibenevolent, why does He allow humans to fall into Sin in the first place, knowing the eternal consequences for many? Is it just to punish finite Sin with infinite suffering? These questions push the boundaries of our understanding of divine justice and mercy.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve, with expressions of sorrow and shame, are being driven out by an angel wielding a flaming sword. The lush, vibrant paradise of Eden is contrasted with a darker, barren landscape beyond the gate, symbolizing the introduction of suffering and mortality into the world as a consequence of their original sin.)

Beyond Resolution: Living with the Question

The Theological Problem of Evil, particularly when viewed through the lens of Sin, is unlikely to ever receive a universally satisfying philosophical "solution" that silences all doubt. Perhaps its enduring nature is part of its profound significance.

Instead of a definitive answer, the problem serves as:

  • A Catalyst for Deeper Faith: For many, confronting evil is not a destroyer of faith but a refiner of it, leading to a more mature understanding of God that embraces mystery and suffering.
  • A Spur for Moral Action: Recognizing evil compels us to actively work for Good and Evil in the world, to alleviate suffering, and to promote justice, aligning our will with what we believe God desires.
  • An Enduring Philosophical Inquiry: The problem continues to drive philosophical and theological discourse, pushing the boundaries of human reason and theological articulation.
  • A Call for Empathy: It forces us to confront the reality of suffering, both our own and that of others, fostering compassion and solidarity.

The Great Books of the Western World are replete with narratives and philosophical treatises that explore these very themes, from the tragic figures of Greek drama to the existential crises of modern literature, demonstrating humanity's relentless grapple with the shadows that accompany the light.

Conclusion: The Unfolding Dialogue

The Theological Problem of Evil, with Sin at its heart, remains one of the most compelling and challenging areas of human thought. It forces us to confront the very nature of God, the reality of Good and Evil, and the complex interplay between divine power and human freedom. While no single answer has ever fully resolved the tension, the ongoing dialogue—the development of theodicies, their critiques, and the personal journeys of faith and doubt—enriches our understanding of what it means to be human in a world marked by both profound beauty and inexplicable suffering. It is a testament to the human spirit's relentless quest for meaning and justice, even in the face of the most profound paradoxes.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""The Problem of Evil Philosophy Animated""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Evil and Free Will Explained""

Share this post