The Theological Problem of Evil (Sin): An Enduring Dilemma for Faith and Reason

Summary:
The Theological Problem of Evil, often framed as the "problem of suffering," grapples with the apparent contradiction between the existence of a perfectly good, all-powerful, and all-knowing God and the undeniable reality of evil and suffering in the world. When Sin is introduced, this philosophical challenge takes on a profound theological dimension, positing human free will and rebellion against divine will as a primary source of moral evil, thereby complicating the traditional arguments and demanding a robust defense of God's justice and benevolence. This pillar page explores the historical articulations of this problem, the various theological responses known as theodicies, and the unique challenges posed by the concept of sin, drawing insights from the Great Books of the Western World.

Introduction: The Shadow in the Light

Greetings, fellow travelers on the intellectual path. Benjamin Richmond here, inviting you to delve into one of philosophy and Theology's most enduring and vexing questions: the Problem of Evil. It's a question that has haunted thinkers from Job to Augustine, from Aquinas to Leibniz, and continues to resonate in our contemporary world. How can a world seemingly crafted by a benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient God be so rife with pain, injustice, and moral depravity? And crucially, how does the concept of Sin – our own deliberate transgression against the divine – fit into this cosmic puzzle?

This isn't merely an academic exercise; it's a profound human dilemma that touches the very core of our understanding of faith, morality, and the divine. As we navigate this complex terrain, we'll draw upon the rich tapestry of the Great Books of the Western World, seeking wisdom from those who have wrestled with these very questions for millennia.

Defining the Terms: Evil, Sin, and God

Before we embark on a deeper exploration, it's essential to clarify our primary concepts. The theological problem of evil is distinct from, though related to, the philosophical problem.

What is Evil?

In a theological context, Evil can be broadly categorized:

  • Moral Evil: Resulting from the free choices and actions of moral agents (e.g., murder, theft, hatred, war). This is where Sin primarily resides.
  • Natural Evil: Suffering and destruction caused by natural phenomena, independent of human will (e.g., earthquakes, tsunamis, diseases, famines).

Philosophically, evil might be considered a privation of good, a lack, or a deviation from a natural order. Theologically, especially within Abrahamic traditions, evil often signifies a rebellion against God's perfect will.

What is Sin?

Sin is a specifically theological concept. It's not merely a mistake or an unfortunate event, but a deliberate transgression against divine law or moral principle. It implies culpability, a knowing or willful turning away from God.

  • Theological Nuances of Sin:
    • Original Sin: The doctrine, notably developed by Augustine, that humanity inherits a sinful nature from Adam's first disobedience. This concept profoundly shapes how Theology approaches the problem of moral evil.
    • Actual Sin: Individual acts of transgression against God's commandments.
    • Sin as Alienation: It separates humanity from God, from one another, and from the created order.

The Nature of God

The problem of evil hinges on the traditional attributes ascribed to God in monotheistic religions, particularly Christianity. These attributes form what is often called the "Inconsistent Triad":

  • Omnipotence: God is all-powerful. He can do anything logically possible.
  • Omnibenevolence: God is perfectly good, loving, and desires the well-being of His creation.
  • Omniscience: God is all-knowing, aware of all past, present, and future events, including all suffering.

The crux of the problem arises: If God possesses all these attributes, why does Evil (both moral and natural) exist?

Historical Perspectives: Voices from the Great Books

The struggle with the problem of evil is ancient. Our intellectual heritage provides a rich foundation for understanding its development.

  • The Book of Job: This biblical narrative, a cornerstone of Western thought, presents the problem in its rawest form. Job, a righteous man, suffers immensely, prompting questions about divine justice. His friends offer various explanations rooted in his supposed sins, but Job maintains his innocence, challenging the conventional wisdom of his time. The divine response emphasizes God's inscrutable wisdom and power, rather than a direct explanation of suffering.

  • St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD): In works like Confessions and City of God, Augustine profoundly shaped Western Theology on evil and sin.

    • He posited that evil is not a substance but a privation of good (privatio boni) – a lack or corruption of what ought to be. This means God, who is perfectly good, did not create evil.
    • He developed the doctrine of Original Sin, arguing that Adam's free choice to disobey God introduced sin and death into the world, corrupting human nature and making all subsequent humanity prone to sin. This is a cornerstone of the Augustinian Theodicy.

  • St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274 AD): In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas refined Augustine's views.

    • He agreed that evil is a privation, arguing that God permits evil for the sake of a greater good, or because it is necessary for the perfection of the universe (e.g., the possibility of evil is necessary for free will).
    • He emphasized that God's providence extends to all things, even evil, but not as its cause. God permits evil, but does not do evil.

  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716 AD): In his Theodicy, Leibniz famously argued that this world, despite its evils, is the "best of all possible worlds" that God could have created.

    • He distinguished between three types of evil: metaphysical (imperfection), physical (suffering), and moral (Sin).
    • Leibniz believed that God, being perfectly rational, chose the world that maximizes good and minimizes evil, even if we cannot fully comprehend His reasons. This perspective attempts to reconcile God's attributes with the existence of evil by appealing to divine optimal choice.

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting Adam and Eve's expulsion from the Garden of Eden, highlighting the moment of their realization of sin and the angelic figures guiding them away from paradise. The scene should convey both sorrow and the weight of moral choice.)

The Problem Articulated: The Inconsistent Triad and Its Challenges

The theological problem of evil is often presented as a logical inconsistency, particularly by philosophers like J.L. Mackie.

The Deductive Problem of Evil

This argument claims that the following propositions cannot all be true simultaneously:

  1. God is omnipotent.
  2. God is omnibenevolent.
  3. Evil exists.

If God is omnipotent, He can prevent evil. If God is omnibenevolent, He wants to prevent evil. Since evil does exist, it logically follows that such a God cannot exist. This is the direct challenge to traditional monotheistic conceptions of God.

The Inductive or Evidential Problem of Evil

This argument suggests that while the existence of evil might not logically disprove God, the sheer amount, variety, and gratuitousness of evil in the world makes God's existence highly improbable. Why, for instance, would a good God permit immense suffering in innocent children or seemingly pointless natural disasters? This version often points to specific examples of evil that seem difficult to justify on any theological grounds.

Theological Responses: Theodicies and the Role of Sin

Theodicies are attempts to "justify God" in the face of evil, offering explanations for why a good and powerful God would permit suffering. The concept of Sin plays a central role in many of these defenses.

1. The Free Will Defense

  • Core Argument: God granted humans (and angels) genuine free will, which is a great good. However, for free will to be truly free, it must include the possibility of choosing Good and Evil. Moral evil (Sin) is not God's direct creation but the unfortunate, albeit necessary, consequence of creatures exercising their freedom to choose wrongly.
  • Relevance of Sin: This defense directly attributes moral evil to human Sin. God values free moral agents over a world of automatons, even if it means risking the misuse of that freedom.
  • Limitations: This defense primarily addresses moral evil. It struggles to explain natural evil, though some argue natural evil is a consequence of the corrupted natural order due to the Fall (Original Sin).

2. The Augustinian Theodicy (Privation and Original Sin)

  • Core Argument: Building on Augustine, this view asserts that evil is not a positive entity but a privation of good. God created everything good, but some created beings (angels, humans) freely chose to turn away from God, corrupting their nature.
  • Relevance of Sin: Original Sin is paramount here. Adam's first sin not only introduced moral evil but also corrupted creation itself, leading to natural evils as a consequence of humanity's fallen state. All humanity is implicated in this inherited sinfulness.
  • Limitations: Some find the idea of inherited guilt problematic. It also struggles to fully explain the extent of natural evil as a direct consequence of human sin.

3. The Irenaean/Soul-Making Theodicy

  • Core Argument: Named after Irenaeus of Lyons, and developed by thinkers like John Hick, this theodicy suggests that the world, with all its challenges and suffering, is a "soul-making" environment. It's not a perfect paradise but a place designed to allow humans to develop into mature, virtuous beings through overcoming adversity, making moral choices, and growing closer to God.
  • Relevance of Sin: While not directly explaining why sin exists, it posits that a world where moral choices (including the choice to sin or to resist sin) have real consequences is necessary for genuine character development. The struggles against Good and Evil are essential for spiritual growth.
  • Limitations: This might seem to justify suffering as a means to an end, which can be difficult for those experiencing profound pain.

4. Cognitive Limitations (Mystery)

  • Core Argument: Some theological perspectives argue that God's ways are ultimately beyond human comprehension. We, as finite beings, cannot fully grasp the divine plan or the reasons for allowing evil. This stance emphasizes faith and humility in the face of mystery.
  • Relevance of Sin: It doesn't directly explain sin but places the entire problem within the realm of divine inscrutability.
  • Limitations: Critics argue this is an intellectual cop-out, abandoning the quest for understanding.

The Unique Challenge of Sin

The concept of Sin significantly deepens the theological problem of evil. It shifts a considerable portion of the blame for moral evil from God to humanity.

  • Human Culpability: If sin is a free act of rebellion, then humanity bears the responsibility for the suffering it causes. This aligns with the idea of a just God who holds His creatures accountable.
  • The Need for Redemption: The existence of sin necessitates a theological solution for its overcoming, often involving concepts of atonement, grace, and salvation, which are central to many faith traditions.
  • The Problem of Original Sin: This doctrine, while offering an explanation for universal human depravity, also raises questions about divine justice. How can a just God hold individuals accountable for a sin committed by their distant ancestors? This has led to extensive theological debate.
Theodicy Primary Explanation for Evil (especially Moral) Role of Sin Key Figures
Free Will Defense Evil is a consequence of creatures' free choice to do wrong. Sin is the direct result of free will; God permits it for a greater good (freedom). Alvin Plantinga (modern), often implied by others
Augustinian Theodicy Evil is a privation of good; original sin corrupted creation. Original Sin is the root of all moral evil and contributes to natural evil. St. Augustine
Soul-Making Theodicy Evil and suffering are necessary for moral and spiritual growth. World designed to allow choices, including sinful ones, for character development. Irenaeus, John Hick

Conclusion: An Ongoing Dialogue

The Theological Problem of Evil, particularly when viewed through the lens of Sin, remains one of the most profound and challenging questions for believers and non-believers alike. It forces us to confront the very nature of God, humanity, and the universe. While no single answer has universally satisfied all, the various theodicies offer compelling frameworks for understanding, rooted deeply in the philosophical and theological traditions preserved within the Great Books of the Western World.

As Benjamin Richmond, I find solace not in definitive answers, but in the ongoing, rigorous pursuit of understanding. The problem of evil is not a wall to faith, but a crucible in which faith is tested, refined, and deepened. It invites us to consider our own agency in the face of Good and Evil, and our responsibility for the Sin that undeniably mars our world. The conversation continues, challenging us to think, to question, and perhaps, to find new meaning in the struggle.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""The Problem of Evil Explained Philosophy""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Augustine on Evil and Free Will""

Share this post