Unpacking the Wild: The State of Nature Hypothesis

The State of Nature Hypothesis is one of political philosophy's most enduring and fundamental thought experiments. It proposes a hypothetical condition of humanity without any established government, laws, or political authority. By imagining what human existence would be like in such a pre-social, pre-political State, philosophers aim to understand and justify the very existence, structure, and moral legitimacy of Government. This intellectual exercise isn't about historical accuracy, but rather about exploring the essential Nature of humanity and the necessity of the social contract.

The Philosophical Playground: What is the State of Nature?

At its core, the State of Nature is a philosophical Hypothesis designed to strip away the layers of convention, law, and social conditioning to reveal what remains. It asks: what would life be like if there were no police, no courts, no rulers, no formal education, no structured economy? Would humans naturally cooperate or descend into chaos? The answers to these questions profoundly shape our understanding of rights, duties, and the optimal form of political organization. It's a lens through which we scrutinize the very foundations of the State.

Visions of Primal Existence: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau

The most influential proponents of the State of Nature Hypothesis — figures whose works are cornerstones of the Great Books of the Western World — offered radically different, yet equally compelling, visions of this pre-political condition. Their contrasting perspectives illuminate the diverse assumptions about human Nature that underpin much of Western political thought.

Thomas Hobbes: A War of All Against All

In his monumental work, Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes famously depicted the State of Nature as a "war of every man against every man" (bellum omnium contra omnes). For Hobbes, without a powerful sovereign to enforce laws, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He believed that human Nature is fundamentally driven by self-preservation and a perpetual desire for power, leading inevitably to conflict in the absence of external constraint. The only escape from this dreadful State is through a social contract where individuals surrender their absolute freedom to an all-powerful Government (the Leviathan) in exchange for security and order.

John Locke: Natural Rights and Moral Law

John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, offered a far more optimistic view. For Locke, the State of Nature is not a lawless free-for-all but is governed by a universal Law of Nature discoverable by reason. This law dictates that no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions. Individuals possess inherent natural rights – to life, liberty, and property – even in the absence of Government. While a State of Nature is not necessarily a State of war, it lacks a common, impartial judge to resolve disputes, making the enjoyment of one's rights insecure. Thus, people form a Government not to escape utter chaos, but to better protect these pre-existing rights and ensure their impartial enforcement.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Noble Savage and Corrupted Society

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, particularly in his Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men, challenged both Hobbes and Locke. He argued that in the true State of Nature, humans were solitary, peaceful "noble savages," driven by self-preservation (amour de soi) tempered by compassion (pitié). For Rousseau, it was the development of society, private property, and complex social interactions that corrupted human Nature, leading to inequality, competition, and ultimately, the need for coercive Government. His Hypothesis suggests that society, far from being a remedy for inherent human flaws, is often the source of them.

Here's a comparison of these foundational perspectives:

Philosopher View of Human Nature View of the State of Nature Reason for Government
Thomas Hobbes Self-interested, power-seeking A "war of all against all"; chaotic, brutal To escape chaos and ensure security (absolute sovereign)
John Locke Rational, endowed with natural rights Governed by natural law; insecure, but not necessarily war To protect natural rights and impartially enforce natural law (limited government)
Jean-Jacques Rousseau Good, compassionate, solitary Peaceful, idyllic, but leads to corruption with society To restore freedom and equality through a general will (collective self-governance)

(Image: A triptych painting depicting three distinct scenes. The left panel shows a desolate, chaotic landscape with shadowy figures clashing, symbolizing Hobbes's 'war of all against all.' The central panel features a serene, verdant wilderness with individuals coexisting peacefully, engaged in simple acts like farming or contemplation, representing Locke's natural law. The right panel portrays a solitary, idyllic figure in harmony with lush nature, untouched by societal constructs, reflecting Rousseau's 'noble savage' before corruption.)

The Enduring Relevance of the Hypothesis

Why does this abstract Hypothesis continue to resonate in our modern world? Because it forces us to confront fundamental questions about the Nature of power, the limits of individual liberty, and the justification for the State.

  • When we debate the scope of Government intervention, we are, in a sense, revisiting Hobbes and Locke.
  • When we discuss human rights in contexts of international anarchy or failed States, we are grappling with the implications of a State of Nature.
  • And when we lament the corrupting influences of consumerism or social inequality, we hear echoes of Rousseau.

The State of Nature is not a historical fact to be uncovered, but a powerful intellectual tool. It compels us to articulate our deepest assumptions about what it means to be human and what kind of Government is truly just and necessary. It reminds us that the social contract, whether explicit or implicit, is a continuous negotiation, perpetually shaped by our evolving understanding of ourselves and our place in the world.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Hobbes Locke Rousseau State of Nature comparison"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "What is the State of Nature philosophy explained"

Share this post