The Indelible Mark: Desire's Role in Human Action

From the moment of our first breath, desire propels us. It is the fundamental engine of human action, an irresistible force that shapes our choices, drives our pursuits, and ultimately defines the trajectory of every man's life. This article explores the multifaceted role of desire in the human experience, tracing its philosophical treatment from ancient Greece to modern thought, examining its intricate relationship with will and reason as elucidated by the masters of the Great Books of the Western World. We shall see how desire, far from being a mere impulse, is a complex phenomenon, capable of both elevating and debasing the human spirit, dictating the very nature of our engagement with the world.

The Primal Urge: Desire as the Genesis of Motion

At its core, desire is a longing, an orientation towards something perceived as good or lacking. It is the spark that ignites the will to act. Without desire, there would be no motivation, no striving, no progress. The ancients recognized this foundational truth.

  • Plato, in works like The Republic, posited desire (epithymia) as one of the three parts of the soul, often depicted as a many-headed beast needing the guidance of reason. Its role is potent, driving us towards basic appetites and pleasures.
  • Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, delved into desire (orexis) as a source of movement, distinguishing between rational and irrational desires. He understood that our actions spring from a combination of thought and desire, with the latter providing the ultimate push towards an end. For man, the pursuit of eudaimonia (flourishing) is itself a profound desire, guided by practical wisdom.

The role of desire here is not merely reactive; it is the proactive force that sets us in motion, dictating the very objects of our pursuit, whether they be sustenance, knowledge, or virtue.

(Image: A classical Greek marble bust of Plato, with an ethereal golden light emanating from his eyes, symbolizing the light of reason attempting to guide the more shadowy, tumultuous forms of human desires swirling subtly in the background.)

The Moral Compass: Desire, Will, and the Good

As philosophical thought matured, the relationship between desire and will became a central concern, particularly in the context of morality and freedom. The question arose: Is man a slave to his desires, or does his will possess the power to choose against them?

Medieval Perspectives on Desire and Will:

Philosopher View on Desire Relationship with Will Implications for Human Action
Augustine Desire for God (caritas) vs. disordered desires (cupiditas) Will is free but corrupted by original sin, leading to struggle against perverse desires. Actions are a battleground between divine love and earthly cravings, requiring grace.
Aquinas Intellective appetite (will) vs. sensitive appetite (passions/desires) Will, guided by reason, can command or restrain sensitive appetites. Rational man strives for the good, directing desires towards virtuous ends.

Here, the will emerges as the faculty capable of directing or resisting desire. The role of desire is still primary, but it is now viewed through a moral lens. Is the desire for power inherently bad, or is it the will's choice to pursue it unjustly that constitutes the moral failing? This distinction highlights the complex agency of man.

The Modern Dilemma: Reason as Slave or Master?

The Enlightenment and subsequent philosophical movements further complicated the understanding of desire's role. Some thinkers elevated desire to an almost supreme position, while others sought to rein it in with the strictures of reason and duty.

  • David Hume, famously argued in A Treatise of Human Nature that "Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them." For Hume, our fundamental motivations stem from desires and aversions; reason merely helps us find the most effective means to satisfy them. This perspective places desire's role as the true sovereign of human action.
  • Immanuel Kant, conversely, championed the supremacy of rational will. In his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, he argued that truly moral actions are those performed out of duty, independent of inclinations or desires. The will, for Kant, is autonomous when it acts according to universal moral laws, rather than being swayed by subjective desires. Here, the role of desire is often seen as a potential obstacle to genuine moral freedom.

These contrasting views underscore the enduring tension in understanding human motivation. Is man fundamentally a creature of instinct and passion, or is he capable of transcending these through rational self-governance?

The Enduring Legacy: Shaping the Man of Action

Ultimately, the role of desire in human action is undeniable and multifaceted. It is the initial impulse, the persistent drive, and often the ultimate aim of our endeavors. The philosophical journey through the Great Books reveals that man is not merely a reactor to desire but an interpreter and, ideally, a director of it.

Whether we view desire as a primal force to be mastered, a moral compass to be aligned, or the very essence of our being, its presence is inextricably linked to our capacity for action. Our understanding of the self, our ethical frameworks, and our societal structures are all built upon the foundational recognition of desire's pervasive and powerful role. To understand man is to understand his desires, and the will he exercises in their pursuit or restraint.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato Aristotle Desire Reason Will Philosophy""
2. ## 📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Hume Kant Desire Morality Free Will""

Share this post