The Unseen Hand: Unpacking the Role of Desire in Human Action

In the grand tapestry of human existence, few threads are as fundamental, as ubiquitous, and yet as perpetually perplexing as desire. It is the engine that drives us, the whisper that guides our choices, and often, the tempest that threatens to capsize our carefully constructed lives. This article will explore the profound and multifaceted role of desire in shaping human action, drawing upon the timeless wisdom preserved within the Great Books of the Western World. We shall contend that understanding desire is not merely an academic exercise, but a crucial endeavor for any man seeking to comprehend the springs of his own conduct and the moral landscape he inhabits.

The Inescapable Impulse: What is Desire?

At its core, desire can be understood as an inclination, an appetite, or a longing for something perceived as good or advantageous. It is an intrinsic aspect of our being, manifesting in countless forms—from the primal urge for sustenance and procreation to the lofty yearning for knowledge, justice, or spiritual transcendence. From the moment of birth, man is a creature of desire, constantly moving towards or away from objects, states, and experiences.

Philosophers across millennia have grappled with desire's nature, its origins, and its relationship to our other faculties, particularly will and reason. Is desire a blind force, or can it be educated? Is it a source of virtue or vice? These are questions that have echoed through the ages, forming the bedrock of ethical and psychological inquiry.

A Historical Traversal: Desire Through the Ages

The role of desire in human action has been a central preoccupation for the great thinkers, each offering a distinct lens through which to view this powerful force.

  • Plato's Tripartite Soul: In the Republic, Plato famously described the soul as having three parts: the appetitive (epithymia), the spirited (thymos), and the rational (logistikon). Desire, in its most basic form, resides in the appetitive part, seeking bodily pleasures and material possessions. Plato believed that true virtue and a harmonious life for man depended on the rational part guiding and controlling the appetitive desires, much like a charioteer controls his horses. Unchecked desire, for Plato, leads to inner turmoil and injustice.

  • Aristotle's Rational Appetite: Aristotle, in works like the Nicomachean Ethics, viewed desire (orexis) as an impulse towards an apparent good. He distinguished between irrational desires (like appetites and emotions) and rational desires, which are aligned with reason. For Aristotle, the will is a rational appetite, a desire that has been deliberated upon and chosen by reason. The virtuous man is one whose desires are in harmony with his reason, aiming for eudaimonia (flourishing or true happiness) through a life of moderation and intellectual pursuit.

  • Augustine's Love and the Will: Saint Augustine, in his Confessions and City of God, explored desire primarily through the lens of love (caritas and cupiditas). He saw man's ultimate desire as being for God. However, fallen human nature meant that desires often became disordered, leading to sin. For Augustine, the will plays a crucial role in directing these loves, either towards God or towards worldly, transient pleasures. True freedom lay in willing what is good, which aligns with God's will.

  • Hobbes' Mechanistic Appetites: Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan, presented a more mechanistic view. For him, desire and aversion are fundamental motions that drive all human action. Desire is simply the motion towards something that man finds agreeable, while aversion is motion away from something disagreeable. The will, in this schema, is merely "the last appetite in deliberating," the final inclination that immediately precedes action. There is no free will in the traditional sense; all actions are determined by the strongest desire.

  • Kant's Duty vs. Inclination: Immanuel Kant, a towering figure in ethical philosophy, sharply distinguished between actions performed from desire (inclination) and actions performed from duty. In his Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, Kant argued that truly moral action could only stem from a good will acting in accordance with universal moral law, irrespective of desires or expected outcomes. Actions driven by desire, even if they produce good results, possess no true moral worth for Kant; they are heteronomous, dictated by external forces or internal feelings rather than by reason's self-imposed law.

This brief overview illustrates the dynamic and often conflicting perspectives on desire's place in the human psyche:

Philosopher View on Desire Relationship to Will/Reason Ethical Implication
Plato Appetitive force, needs control Reason must guide and control desire Virtue through rational mastery
Aristotle Impulse towards apparent good Will as rational appetite, desires can be rational Eudaimonia through harmonized desires and reason
Augustine Love, either for God or worldly things Will directs love; disordered desires lead to sin Salvation through rightly ordered love/will
Hobbes Fundamental appetites/aversions Will is the last appetite in deliberation Actions determined by strongest desire
Kant Inclination, heteronomous Moral will acts against desire, from duty True morality requires acting from duty, not desire

(Image: A detailed classical drawing depicting Plato's Chariot Allegory, with a charioteer (Reason) holding the reins of two horses: one noble and spirited (Thymos) and the other unruly and dark (Epithymia or Appetite), struggling to pull the chariot upwards towards a celestial realm.)

The Interplay of Desire, Will, and Reason

It becomes evident that the role of desire is rarely solitary. It is almost always in a complex dance with will and reason. For some, like Hobbes, the will is merely a servant of the strongest desire. For others, like Kant, the will must stand in stark opposition to desire if morality is to be achieved.

Yet, a more nuanced perspective, perhaps best articulated by Aristotle and later refined by Aquinas, suggests that the will is a rational appetite. It desires what reason presents as good. Here, reason's role is to discern true goods from apparent ones, to weigh short-term gratification against long-term flourishing. The virtuous man is not one devoid of desire, but one whose desires are properly ordered and aligned with reason's judgment, empowered by a strong will to pursue those higher goods.

Without desire, man would be inert, an unmoving statue. It is the initial spark, the fundamental motivation that sets us in motion. The philosophical challenge, therefore, is not to eradicate desire, but to understand its nature, to cultivate virtuous desires, and to integrate them harmoniously with our rational faculties and our capacity for choice.

Ethical Implications and the Path to Flourishing

The understanding of desire's role has profound ethical implications. If unchecked, base desires can lead to addiction, cruelty, and societal breakdown. Conversely, noble desires—for justice, truth, beauty, and compassion—can inspire greatness and foster human flourishing.

The journey of man is, in many ways, the journey of managing and directing desire. It involves:

  1. Self-Awareness: Recognizing the desires that drive us.
  2. Rational Evaluation: Using reason to determine which desires are truly beneficial and which are detrimental.
  3. Cultivation of Virtue: Developing habits of moderation, courage, and justice that help align our desires with our highest ideals.
  4. Strength of Will: Exercising the will to choose the good, even when it conflicts with immediate gratification.

Ultimately, the goal is not to live a life free of desire, which would be both impossible and undesirable, but rather to live a life where our desires are ordered, purposeful, and conducive to a truly good existence.

Conclusion: The Enduring Challenge

The role of desire in human action remains one of philosophy's most enduring and vital subjects. From Plato's charioteer struggling to control unruly steeds to Kant's categorical imperative demanding actions free from inclination, the tension between what we want and what we ought to do has defined much of our intellectual heritage.

For any thinking man, grappling with the power of his own desires, understanding the interplay between desire, will, and reason is not merely an academic pursuit. It is the very process of self-knowledge and self-mastery, a continuous effort to guide the fundamental impulses of our nature towards a life of purpose, virtue, and genuine flourishing. The Great Books offer not simple answers, but profound frameworks for navigating this quintessential human challenge.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Chariot Allegory explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant's Ethics: Duty vs Inclination""

Share this post