The Relationship Between Fate and Will and Relation

The Enduring Dance: Unraveling the Relationship Between Fate and Will

The human condition is perpetually poised on a precipice, gazing into the vast chasm between what must be and what might be. At the heart of this existential tension lies the profound relation between fate and will. Is our journey predetermined, etched in the cosmic tapestry before our first breath, or are we the architects of our own destiny, charting courses with each conscious choice? This isn't merely an academic exercise; it's a fundamental inquiry into agency, responsibility, and the very nature of existence itself, a question that has echoed through the Great Books of the Western World for millennia.

The Paradox at the Heart of Being

From the ancient tragedians to modern existentialists, philosophers have grappled with the apparent contradiction: if fate, often understood as an unyielding chain of events or a divine plan, dictates our path, then where does our will, our capacity for choice and self-determination, fit in? Conversely, if our will is truly free, does that negate any concept of a preordained destiny or a universe governed by necessity and contingency? This isn't a simple either/or proposition, but a complex interplay of forces that shapes our understanding of morality, purpose, and freedom.

Defining the Cosmic Hand: What is Fate?

Fate manifests in philosophical discourse in several compelling forms, often aligning with the concept of necessity.

Divine Predestination: The belief that a benevolent (or sometimes inscrutable) deity has already determined the course of all events, including individual lives. This view often raises questions about divine justice and human accountability.
Natural Law/Determinism: The idea that all events, including human actions, are the inevitable consequence of preceding causes, governed by the immutable laws of nature. This scientific or mechanistic view suggests a universe where every action is predictable, given enough information.
Cosmic Destiny: A more mystical or spiritual interpretation, where an overarching pattern or purpose guides existence, often beyond human comprehension. Think of the Stoic concept of logos, an all-pervading reason that orders the cosmos.
Tragic Necessity: As seen in Greek drama, where characters are often trapped by circumstances or prophecies they cannot escape, despite their best efforts. Their choices, paradoxically, often lead them towards their fated end.

In all these interpretations, fate implies a certain necessity – things must happen as they do, leaving little to no room for deviation.

The Spark of Agency: What is Will?

In stark contrast to fate stands the concept of will, the very engine of human agency, deeply entwined with contingency.

Free Will: The capacity of agents to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. This is the cornerstone of moral responsibility; if we choose freely, we can be held accountable for our actions.
Conscious Choice: The deliberate act of selecting one option over others, involving deliberation, reasoning, and intention.
Self-Determination: The ability to make one's own decisions and manage one's own life, independent of external coercion.
Moral Responsibility: The notion that individuals are deserving of praise, blame, reward, or punishment for their actions, predicated on their capacity for free choice.

The realm of will is the realm of contingency – things could be otherwise; our choices make a difference.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting a blindfolded figure, possibly Lady Justice or Fortuna, with one hand resting on a large, intricate gear mechanism representing fate, and the other hand slightly outstretched towards a small, glowing ember or flame symbolizing human will, struggling to direct a tiny, delicate compass. The background shows a stormy sky gradually clearing towards a distant, sunlit horizon.)

Historical Reflections on the Interplay

Throughout history, thinkers from the Great Books have offered diverse perspectives on how these colossal forces interact.

Philosophical School/Era	View on Fate	View on Will	Core Relation
Ancient Stoicism	Embrace of logos (universal reason/fate) as natural law.	Freedom lies in accepting fate, aligning one's will with what is necessary.	True freedom is not freedom from fate, but freedom within fate – the capacity to choose one's attitude and response to external events. One cannot change what is fated, but one can change how one reacts to it.
Augustine of Hippo	Divine foreknowledge and omnipotence imply a preordained plan.	God grants humans free will, yet knows their choices in advance.	A profound tension: God knows what we will choose, but this knowledge does not cause our choice. Our will remains free, but operates within a divinely known framework. This grapples with necessity (God's knowledge) and contingency (human choice).
Medieval Scholasticism	God's eternal decrees and providence.	Human reason and the capacity for moral choice.	Attempts to reconcile divine omnipotence and human freedom, often through distinctions between absolute and ordained power, or by emphasizing that God's plan incorporates human free choices. Aquinas, for example, argued that God moves the will in a way that preserves its freedom.
Enlightenment Rationalism	Often leaned towards scientific determinism (e.g., Spinoza's monism).	Emphasis on human reason to understand and shape the world.	If the universe operates by mechanical laws, free will is an illusion. However, understanding these laws allows for a form of rational self-mastery, where knowledge informs better choices, even if those choices are ultimately determined.
Existentialism	Rejection of inherent fate or predetermined meaning.	Absolute freedom and radical responsibility to create one's own meaning.	There is no predetermined essence; existence precedes essence. Humans are "condemned to be free" – forced to make choices in a meaningless universe, thereby creating their own values and purpose. This perspective champions contingency as the ultimate reality of human existence, pushing back against any notion of necessity.

The Interwoven Threads: How They Relate

The relation between fate and will is rarely one of simple opposition. Instead, many philosophical traditions suggest a dynamic interplay:

Fate as Boundary, Will as Navigation: Fate might define the landscape – the circumstances of our birth, our natural talents, the historical epoch we inhabit. Our will then becomes the force that navigates this landscape, choosing paths, building structures, and interpreting meaning within those given confines.
Fate as Potential, Will as Actualization: Perhaps fate doesn't dictate specific events, but rather sets a range of potentials or probabilities. It's our will that actualizes one of these potentials, bringing a specific outcome into being from a field of contingency.
Fate as Unseen Influence, Will as Response: We might be unconsciously influenced by forces beyond our control – genetics, societal conditioning, historical currents. Our will then becomes the conscious effort to understand these influences and choose how to respond to them, rather than simply reacting.
The Illusion of Choice: A more deterministic view argues that our sense of will is an elaborate illusion. Our choices are merely the final step in a causal chain stretching back indefinitely, making our decisions ultimately a matter of necessity, not true contingency.

The Enduring Question: Necessity and Contingency in Our Lives

The debate over necessity and contingency lies at the heart of this tension. Is everything that happens necessary – could it not have been otherwise? Or is there genuine contingency – could things truly have unfolded differently if a different choice had been made?

Necessity often provides comfort, absolving us of ultimate responsibility for outcomes beyond our control. It suggests an underlying order, perhaps even a purpose.
Contingency empowers us, placing the burden and the glory of creation squarely on our shoulders. It demands responsibility and offers the thrilling possibility of genuine change.

Ultimately, the most compelling philosophical approaches don't eliminate one in favor of the other, but seek to understand their intricate dance. We are both products of our circumstances (fate/necessity) and agents capable of shaping them (will/contingency). To deny either is to diminish the richness of the human experience.

Conclusion: A Continuous Dialogue

The relation between fate and will remains one of philosophy's most fertile grounds for exploration. It challenges us to ponder the limits of our freedom, the nature of causality, and our place in a vast, complex universe. While definitive answers may elude us, the very act of wrestling with these concepts, as generations have done within the pages of the Great Books of the Western World, refines our understanding of ourselves and the world we inhabit. It's a dialogue that continues to shape our ethics, our aspirations, and our profound sense of being.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Free Will vs Determinism Philosophy" "Stoicism Fate and Free Will Explained""