The Relation Between Labor and Slavery and Relation

The Uncomfortable Nexus: Unpacking the Relation Between Labor and Slavery

Summary: The relation between labor and slavery is a concept steeped in philosophical complexity and historical paradox. While chattel slavery represents the absolute denial of a man's freedom, reducing him to an instrument of another's will, philosophical inquiry, particularly through the lens of the Great Books of the Western World, reveals how various forms of labor, even in ostensibly free societies, can approach or even embody aspects of subjugation. This article explores how thinkers from antiquity to modernity have grappled with the nature of labor, the inherent dignity of man, and the subtle yet profound ways work can either liberate or enslave.

Defining the Terms: Work, Freedom, and Ownership

To understand the intricate relation, we must first establish a foundational understanding of our key terms.

Labor: At its most fundamental, labor is the exertion of physical or mental effort to achieve a purpose, produce goods, or render services. It is an activity intrinsic to human existence, a means by which man interacts with and transforms the world around him. Philosophically, it can be seen as an expression of human agency, creativity, and self-realization.
Slavery: In its most direct form, slavery denotes a condition where one man is treated as the property of another, stripped of all rights, autonomy, and ownership over his own body and labor. His will is subsumed by that of his master, and his labor is entirely coerced, without compensation or personal benefit.
Relation: The connection or interaction between these two concepts. This relation is not always one of simple opposition but often one of uncomfortable proximity, where the conditions of labor can blur the lines of freedom and servitude.

The paradox is stark: labor, a potentially ennobling human endeavor, can be twisted into the very mechanism of a man's enslavement.

Ancient Roots: Labor as a Mark of Status

From the earliest philosophical texts, the relation between labor and the status of man has been a central theme.

Aristotle and the "Natural Slave"

In his Politics, Aristotle famously posited the concept of the "natural slave." For Aristotle, some individuals were by nature suited to be mere instruments, their highest function being physical labor for the benefit of their masters. He argued that the slave, though a man, lacked the full deliberative faculty necessary for self-governance, thus making his enslavement not only permissible but even beneficial for both master and slave.

Key Insight: Here, labor is directly tied to a perceived lack of rational capacity, making it the defining characteristic of a subservient man. The relation is one of inherent hierarchy, where manual labor is viewed as undignified for the free citizen.

Plato's Republic: Division of Labor and Fixed Roles

While Plato in his Republic did not explicitly endorse chattel slavery as broadly as Aristotle, his ideal state envisioned a rigid division of labor where each class performed its specific function. The producers (farmers, artisans) were to focus on their crafts, while the guardians and philosopher-kings governed. While not enslaved in the traditional sense, their roles were fixed, and their lives dictated by the needs of the state, limiting individual autonomy in a way that resonates with aspects of unfreedom.

Enlightenment and the Dawn of Self-Ownership

The Enlightenment brought a radical shift, emphasizing individual rights, freedom, and the concept of self-ownership, which directly challenged the philosophical underpinnings of slavery and redefined the relation of man to his labor.

John Locke: Labor, Property, and Self-Possession

John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, asserted that every man has a property in his own person, and "the labor of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his." This revolutionary idea established that when a man mixes his labor with nature, he makes it his own.

Key Contrast: For Locke, free labor is the foundation of property and liberty. Slavery, by contrast, is the ultimate violation of this principle, as it denies a man ownership over his own body, his labor, and the fruits thereof. The relation is one of fundamental opposition: free labor defines freedom, slavery defines its absence.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Chains of Society

Rousseau's famous opening line in The Social Contract—"Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains"—speaks to a broader concept of unfreedom beyond chattel slavery. He argued that societal structures and conventions could impose a new kind of servitude, where individuals are alienated from their true selves and subject to the general will or the wills of others. While not directly addressing slavery in the chattel sense, Rousseau highlights how social and political relations can diminish a man's autonomy, making him a slave to convention or corrupt governance.

The Industrial Age: Wage Slavery and Alienation

The industrial revolution and the rise of capitalism introduced new dimensions to the relation between labor and slavery, prompting critiques from thinkers like Karl Marx.

Karl Marx: Alienated Labor and Economic Subjugation

For Marx, the capitalist system, despite abolishing chattel slavery, introduced a new form of subjugation: wage slavery. In his Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Marx argued that under capitalism, the worker becomes alienated from:

The product of his labor: He does not own what he creates.
The act of labor itself: Work becomes a means to an end, not an end in itself, external to his true being.
His species-being: His human essence, his creative potential, is stifled.
Other men: Competition and commodity relations replace genuine human connection.

Key Argument: While legally free, the worker is compelled to sell his labor power to survive. This economic coercion, Marx contended, reduces the man to a commodity, his labor a mere instrument for capital accumulation. The relation here is subtle but profound: the worker is not owned, but his labor is, and his very existence is conditioned by this exchange, creating a condition that, for Marx, shared fundamental characteristics with slavery in its denial of human flourishing and self-determination.

(Image: A detailed classical drawing depicting a muscular figure, representative of a worker or laborer, straining under a heavy burden. The figure's face shows a mixture of effort and resignation, and their chains, though perhaps metaphorical, are subtly suggested by the posture and the weight they carry. The background is indistinct, suggesting a universal struggle.)

Degrees of Unfreedom: A Spectrum of Labor

It becomes clear that the relation between labor and slavery is not always a binary opposition but can exist on a spectrum, defined by the degree of a man's autonomy and ownership over his own efforts and life.

Condition of Labor	Key Characteristics	Ownership of Self & Labor	Freedom of Will	Philosophical Implications
Chattel Slavery	Absolute ownership by another; forced labor without compensation; no rights.	None	None	Complete dehumanization; man as instrument.
Indentured Servitude	Voluntary contract for a period of labor to repay debt; limited rights during term.	Limited/Temporarily ceded	Severely restricted	Partial loss of autonomy for a defined period; choice under duress.
Wage Slavery (Marxist)	Legally free; economically compelled to sell labor power for survival; alienation.	Owns self, but labor power is commodity	Coerced by economic necessity	Man reduced to economic function; loss of creative essence.
Forced Labor (e.g., prison labor, conscription)	State-imposed labor as punishment or duty; lack of choice.	Owns self, but labor is mandated	None for labor itself	State power over individual body and labor.
Free Labor	Voluntary choice of work; ownership of labor and its fruits; autonomy.	Full	Full	Expression of human agency, self-realization.

The Enduring Question: What is a Free Man's Labor?

The philosophical journey through the Great Books reveals that the shadow of slavery—the denial of a man's self-ownership and autonomy—can extend far beyond its most brutal form. It compels us to ask: What truly constitutes free labor? Is it merely the absence of chains, or does it require a deeper liberation, ensuring that every man can find meaning, dignity, and self-realization in his work?

The continued examination of the relation between labor and slavery forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about economic systems, social structures, and the perennial struggle to uphold the inherent dignity and freedom of every man.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Marx Alienated Labor Explained""