The Relation Between Labor and Slavery and Relation

The Indissoluble Knot: Examining the Relation Between Labor and Slavery

The relation between labor and slavery is one of philosophy's most enduring and unsettling subjects, a complex nexus that challenges our understanding of human dignity, freedom, and the very essence of man. From ancient philosophical defenses of chattel slavery to modern critiques of exploitative wage systems, thinkers across the centuries have grappled with how forced work defines, deforms, and inverts the natural human act of creation and sustenance. This article delves into the historical and philosophical perspectives found within the Great Books of the Western World, exploring how the concept of labor becomes twisted under the yoke of slavery, and the profound implications for the individual and society.

The Ancient World's Stark Delineation

For many classical philosophers, the relation between labor and slavery was not just an economic reality but a foundational element of their social structures and philosophical systems.

Aristotle and the "Natural Slave"

Aristotle, in his Politics, famously posits the existence of "natural slaves" – individuals whose very nature, he argued, made them suited to be instruments of others. He saw manual labor as a necessary but undignified activity, best performed by those lacking the capacity for reasoned deliberation. For Aristotle:

The Master: Possesses reason and is capable of political life and philosophy.
The Slave: A "living tool," whose body is used for practical purposes, primarily physical labor.
The Relation: The slave's labor frees the citizen to pursue higher intellectual and political activities, thus making slavery an essential component for the flourishing of the polis.

This perspective highlights an early and stark relation where the labor of one man directly enables the freedom and intellectual pursuits of another, casting slavery not merely as forced work, but as a condition of being. The denial of full human status to the slave was often justified by their designated role in arduous, manual labor.

Plato's Ideal State and the Necessity of Toil

While Plato, in his Republic, did not explicitly defend chattel slavery as Aristotle did, his vision of an ideal state still presupposed a division of labor where the lowest classes, those engaged in manual and agricultural work, supported the guardians and rulers. The philosophical elite were freed from the necessity of labor, suggesting a hierarchical relation where the toil of some undergirds the intellectual pursuits of others, even if not through outright enslavement.

The Enlightenment and the Reassessment of Labor and Freedom

The philosophical currents of the Enlightenment brought a radical shift in understanding the inherent dignity of man and the nature of labor, challenging the ancient justifications for slavery.

Locke and Property in One's Person

John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, laid groundwork that implicitly undermined the institution of slavery. He argued that every man has a property in his own person, and that his labor is an extension of that self-ownership. When a man mixes his labor with something, he makes it his own. The logical extension of this is that no one can own another's labor without owning their person, which directly contradicts the idea of self-ownership. The relation here becomes one of individual autonomy; to enslave a man is to violate his fundamental right to his own body and the fruits of his labor.

Rousseau and the Chains of Society

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, famously declared, "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." While not exclusively focused on chattel slavery, Rousseau's critique of societal structures and the loss of natural freedom resonated deeply with later abolitionist movements. He saw oppressive systems, which forced individuals into conditions akin to servitude, as a perversion of humanity. The relation between labor and slavery here is seen through the lens of corrupted societal arrangements, where the labor of many is exploited for the benefit of a few, leading to a form of moral and political enslavement.

The Hegelian Dialectic and the Master-Slave Relation

Perhaps one of the most profound philosophical explorations of the relation between labor and slavery comes from G.W.F. Hegel in his Phenomenology of Spirit.

The Struggle for Recognition

Hegel's master-slave dialectic describes a struggle for recognition. In this scenario:

The Master: Seeks to assert his independence by forcing the slave to labor for him, consuming the fruits of the slave's work.
The Slave: Through his labor, transforms nature and, in doing so, transforms himself. He learns mastery over nature and indirectly, through the product of his labor, creates a sense of self.
The Paradoxical Outcome: The master becomes dependent on the slave's labor for his sustenance and identity, while the slave, through his active engagement with the world through labor, develops a deeper self-consciousness and a path towards true freedom.

Here, the relation between labor and slavery is not static but dynamic, a process where labor, even under compulsion, becomes the very mechanism for the slave's eventual self-realization and the master's ultimate stagnation. The dignity of man is found not in avoiding labor, but in the transformative power of engaging with it.

(Image: A classical Greek fresco depicting two figures: on the left, an Athenian citizen in a toga, holding a scroll and gesturing towards a philosophical discussion; on the right, a darker-skinned, sparsely clothed figure toiling with tools in a field, back bent. The citizen appears contemplative and at ease, while the laborer is engaged in strenuous physical effort, symbolizing the ancient societal division and the philosophical justification for the relation between intellectual pursuits and manual labor.)

Modern Echoes: Labor, Alienation, and Contemporary Slavery

The philosophical insights from the Great Books continue to inform our understanding of the relation between labor and slavery in contemporary contexts. Karl Marx, heavily influenced by Hegel, further developed the concept of alienated labor, arguing that under capitalism, the worker becomes estranged from the product of his labor, the process of labor itself, his species-being, and other man. While not chattel slavery, Marx saw wage labor as a form of subjugation where the worker sells his labor-power, leading to a new kind of unfreedom.

Philosophical Perspective	View on Labor	View on Slavery	Core Relation
Aristotle	Undignified, necessary for sustenance	"Natural" state for some, essential for citizen leisure	Slavery enables citizen's freedom from labor
Locke	Extension of self-ownership, basis of property	Violation of self-ownership and natural rights	Labor implies freedom; slavery denies it
Hegel	Transformative, self-realizing	A stage in the dialectic of self-consciousness	Labor, even forced, can lead to self-awareness and freedom
Marx	Essential human activity, but can be alienated	A form of exploitation, continuum of unfree labor	Alienated labor shares characteristics of subjugation

The enduring lesson from these philosophical explorations is that the relation between labor and slavery is not merely historical. It forces us to continually examine the conditions under which human labor is performed, to question who benefits from it, and to ensure that the dignity of every man is upheld, preventing labor from ever again becoming a chain rather than a means of self-expression and contribution.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Hegel Master-Slave Dialectic Explained""