The Stirrings Within: Exploring the Psychological Basis of Emotion

Summary: The essence of human experience is inextricably linked to emotion, yet its fundamental nature—how it arises, where it resides, and its influence on the man—has perplexed philosophers for millennia. This article delves into the historical philosophical inquiry into the psychological basis of emotion, drawing heavily from the Great Books of the Western World. We will trace the evolution of thought from ancient Greek notions of the soul and passions, through the mind-body dualism of the Enlightenment, to later deterministic and empirical perspectives, revealing how thinkers grappled with the interplay of mind, body, and the very physics of our internal states to understand these powerful forces that shape human existence.

I. The Ancient Roots of Passion: Soul, Reason, and the Human Condition

From the earliest philosophical inquiries, emotion was recognized as a powerful, often disruptive, force within the man. The Greeks, in particular, sought to understand its place within the broader structure of the soul and its relationship to reason.

  • Plato's Tripartite Soul: In works like The Republic and Phaedrus, Plato posited a soul divided into three parts:
    • The Rational Part (Logistikon): Seeks truth and reason, akin to the charioteer.
    • The Spirited Part (Thymoeides): Associated with honor, courage, and righteous indignation, the noble steed.
    • The Appetitive Part (Epithymetikon): Driven by bodily desires and pleasures, the unruly steed.
      Plato viewed emotions as arising from the spirited and appetitive parts, often needing to be guided and controlled by reason for the man to achieve virtue and harmony. The "psychological basis" here is an internal conflict and balance within the mind itself.
  • Aristotle and the Passions: Aristotle, particularly in Nicomachean Ethics and Rhetoric, offered a more nuanced view. He defined emotions (or "passions" as they were often termed) as "appetites, anger, fear, boldness, envy, joy, love, hatred, longing, emulation, pity, and in general, feelings that are usually accompanied by pleasure or pain."
    • Reason and Virtue: For Aristotle, emotions were not inherently bad but could be felt "at the right times, with reference to the right objects, towards the right people, with the right motive, and in the right way." This moderation, governed by practical wisdom (phronesis), was crucial for virtue. The mind's role was not to suppress but to properly direct and proportion emotion.
    • Bodily Manifestation: Aristotle also acknowledged the close connection between emotion and the body, noting that passions involve both a formal (mental) and material (physical) aspect. While not explicitly using the term physics, his observation points towards the embodied nature of these psychological states.

II. Descartes and the Mechanics of the Soul: A New Dualism

The Enlightenment brought a radical shift with René Descartes, who fundamentally altered the discourse on the mind and body, and by extension, emotion. His work, The Passions of the Soul, is a seminal text in this regard.

  • Mind-Body Dualism: Descartes famously proposed a strict separation between the thinking substance (res cogitans – the mind) and the extended substance (res extensa – the body, subject to physics).
    • The Body as a Machine: He viewed the body as a complex machine, governed by mechanical principles, much like an automaton. Bodily movements and sensations could be explained by the physics of nerve impulses and animal spirits.
    • The Passions as Bodily Motions: For Descartes, passions were primarily "perceptions, sensations, or commotions of the soul which we relate particularly to the soul itself, and which are caused, maintained, and strengthened by some movement of the spirits." These "spirits" (a subtle fluid flowing through nerves) acted upon the pineal gland, which he believed was the primary seat of the soul's interaction with the body.
  • The Role of the Will: While passions originate in the body, the rational mind (the soul) has the power, through the will, to influence and regulate them. The man is not merely a slave to his passions but can, through reason, direct his actions and even modify the bodily movements that give rise to emotions. This offered a new psychological basis: emotion as a bridge between the mechanical body and the conscious mind.

III. Determinism, Empiricism, and the Affects: Spinoza and Hume

Following Descartes, other philosophers challenged or refined his ideas, often seeking a more unified or empirically grounded understanding of emotion.

  • Spinoza's Geometric Ethics: Baruch Spinoza, in his Ethics, presented a strikingly deterministic and monistic system. He rejected Descartes's dualism, arguing that mind and body are two attributes of a single substance (God or Nature).
    • Affects as Modifications of the Body: Spinoza defined "affects" (his term for emotions) as "modifications of the body, by which the body's power of acting is increased or diminished, aided or restrained, and at the same time, the ideas of these modifications." Here, emotion is deeply intertwined with the physics of the body's state and its capacity for action.
    • Freedom Through Understanding: For Spinoza, true freedom for the man comes not from suppressing affects but from understanding their necessary causes. By comprehending the physics of our desires and aversions, the mind can transform passive affects into active ones, leading to a state of blessedness.
  • Hume and the Primacy of Passion: David Hume, a radical empiricist, offered another powerful critique, particularly in A Treatise of Human Nature.
    • Reason as Slave to Passions: Hume famously asserted, "Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them." For Hume, reason's role is merely to discover the most effective means to achieve ends dictated by our emotions and desires.
    • Impressions and Ideas: Emotions arise from "impressions"—vivid, immediate experiences—which then give rise to less vivid "ideas." The psychological basis is rooted in sensory experience and internal feelings, making emotion a primary driver of human action and morality.

IV. The Enduring Enigma of Emotion for the Modern Man

From the ancient Greeks grappling with the mind's control over the passions, to Descartes's mechanical explanations, and Spinoza's deterministic physics of affects, the quest to understand the psychological basis of emotion has been a central theme in philosophy. These historical perspectives, drawn from the Great Books, reveal a continuous effort to locate emotion within the broader framework of the man's existence—its origins in the mind or body, its role in reason and morality, and its ultimate impact on human flourishing. Even today, as neuroscience probes the brain's physical mechanisms, the philosophical questions about the subjective experience of emotion and its meaning for the conscious man remain profoundly relevant.

(Image: A detailed allegorical painting from the 17th century, depicting a pensive philosopher in a study, surrounded by symbolic elements representing the human mind, such as books, a skull, and an hourglass. A subtle, almost ethereal light emanates from his head, suggesting thought or the soul, while shadows play across his body, hinting at the physical and emotional burdens of existence. In the background, a classical statue of a figure in distress or contemplation further emphasizes the theme of human emotion and its philosophical inquiry.)

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Philosophy of Emotion: Ancient to Modern Theories""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Descartes Passions of the Soul Explained""

Share this post