The Enduring Conundrum of Sin and Will: A Philosophical Inquiry

The human condition is perpetually entangled in a profound philosophical knot: the Problem of Sin and Will. This intricate dilemma probes the very essence of human agency, moral responsibility, and the nature of Good and Evil. If we possess free will, are we truly accountable for our transgressions? If sin is a universal affliction, what does it say about our capacity for good, or the divine order that permits such failings? This pillar page delves into the historical and philosophical journey through these questions, drawing deeply from the intellectual heritage of the Great Books of the Western World, to unravel the multifaceted layers of this enduring problem.

Unpacking the Core Concepts: Problem, Sin, Will, Good and Evil

Before we embark on this intellectual expedition, it is crucial to establish a shared understanding of the bedrock terms that constitute our inquiry. These are not mere words, but concepts laden with millennia of philosophical debate.

  • The Problem: In philosophy, a "problem" often refers to a paradox, a conceptual difficulty, or a question that resists straightforward resolution, particularly when it touches upon fundamental aspects of existence, morality, or knowledge. The Problem of Sin and Will is precisely such a conundrum, challenging our understanding of human freedom, divine justice, and the origin of evil.
  • Sin: While often understood in a theological context as a transgression against divine law or a separation from God, philosophically, sin can be viewed as a moral failing, an act contrary to reason, or a choice that deviates from the pursuit of the Good. It implies a defect in human character or action, resulting in harm to oneself or others, or a departure from an ideal state.
  • Will: At the heart of our discussion is the concept of will, specifically free will. This refers to the human capacity to make choices and decisions that are genuinely our own, uncoerced by external forces or predetermined by prior causes. It is the faculty that allows us to deliberate, choose, and act, thereby making us morally responsible agents. The scope and nature of this freedom are central to understanding sin.
  • Good and Evil: These are fundamental moral categories. Good generally refers to that which is desirable, beneficial, virtuous, or morally right, often associated with flourishing and well-being. Evil, conversely, denotes that which is harmful, destructive, vicious, or morally wrong. The existence of evil in a world purportedly created by a benevolent power is a primary driver of the Problem of Sin and Will.

A Historical Trajectory: From Ancient Greece to Medieval Scholasticism

The Problem of Sin and Will is not a modern invention but a thread woven through the fabric of Western thought since its nascent stages.

Classical Foundations: Ignorance and Virtue

Even before the explicit theological framework of "sin," ancient Greek philosophers grappled with the origins of wrongdoing.

  • Socrates & Plato: For Socrates, famously, "no one does evil willingly." Evil acts stemmed from ignorance of the Good. If one truly knew what was good, they would invariably choose it. Plato, building on this, suggested that the soul's disharmony or a lack of proper education led individuals astray. The will, in this view, is primarily guided by reason, and error is a failure of intellect, not a malicious choice.
  • Aristotle: In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explored voluntary and involuntary actions. He argued that moral responsibility attaches only to voluntary actions, those chosen after deliberation. While acknowledging that bad habits can make vicious acts seem "natural," he maintained that the initial choices that form character are voluntary. Here, the seed of individual will as a source of moral action is clearly discernible.

The Augustinian Revolution: The Corrupted Will

The advent of Christianity, particularly through the towering intellect of St. Augustine of Hippo, fundamentally reshaped the discourse. Augustine’s personal struggles, detailed in his Confessions, and his theological battles, laid the groundwork for understanding sin not merely as ignorance, but as a deliberate turning away from God, a corruption of the will.

  • Original Sin: Augustine articulated the doctrine of Original Sin, inherited from Adam, which profoundly impacted human nature. This concept posits that humanity's will is not perfectly free to choose the Good after the Fall, but is predisposed towards sin.
  • Privation of Good: He argued that evil is not a positive substance but a privation of good, a lack or absence where good ought to be. Sin, then, is a disordered love, a misuse of the will that directs it towards lesser goods instead of the ultimate Good (God). This reoriented the problem from intellectual error to a defect of the will itself.
  • Freedom and Grace: For Augustine, true freedom is the ability not to sin. While humans retain a form of free will (the ability to choose between options), this will is crippled by sin, rendering it incapable of achieving salvation without divine grace.

Medieval Synthesis: Reason, Will, and Divine Order

The Scholastic philosophers of the Middle Ages, notably St. Thomas Aquinas, sought to reconcile Augustinian theology with Aristotelian philosophy, offering a more nuanced view.

  • Aquinas's Rational Appetite: In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas viewed the will as a "rational appetite," meaning it is naturally inclined towards the Good as apprehended by the intellect. Sin, for Aquinas, is a voluntary act that deviates from the order of reason and divine law.
  • Degrees of Sin: He distinguished between different types and degrees of sin, based on the knowledge and consent of the will. While acknowledging the effects of Original Sin, Aquinas emphasized that human beings retain sufficient free will to be morally responsible for their actions. The will is free to choose the means to an end, even if the ultimate end (happiness, Good) is naturally desired.

Key Arguments and Philosophical Perspectives

The Problem of Sin and Will has generated diverse philosophical approaches, each attempting to grapple with the tension between human freedom and moral failing.

Theodicy and the Problem of Evil

Perhaps the most direct engagement with our problem comes in the form of theodicy – the attempt to reconcile the existence of evil with an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God.

| Theodicy Type | Core Argument

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Problem of Sin and Will philosophy"

Share this post