The Enduring Conundrum: Navigating the Problem of Sin and Will

The intersection of human will and the concept of sin presents one of philosophy's most enduring and perplexing problems. At its core, this inquiry grapples with the fundamental question of why individuals, endowed with the capacity for rational thought and moral choice, so often choose paths contrary to what is considered good. This pillar page delves into the intricate relationship between the human will, its freedom, its limitations, and the philosophical implications of sin, tracing its evolution through the annals of Western thought, particularly as illuminated by the Great Books of the Western World. We will explore how thinkers from antiquity to modernity have wrestled with the origins of moral failing and the profound challenge of reconciling human autonomy with the pervasive reality of evil.

I. The Genesis of the Problem: Defining Sin and Will

To understand the conundrum, we must first delineate its primary components. The terms "sin" and "will," while seemingly straightforward, conceal layers of philosophical complexity that have occupied the greatest minds for millennia.

What is Sin? A Philosophical Inquiry

Beyond its theological connotations, sin in a philosophical context often refers to a transgression against a moral law, a deviation from virtue, or an act that knowingly or unknowingly contributes to evil. It is not merely an error of judgment but frequently implies a culpable choice.

  • Augustine of Hippo: For Augustine, a towering figure whose works like Confessions and City of God are cornerstones of the Great Books, sin is fundamentally a turning away from God, the supreme Good, and a perverse turning towards lesser goods. His concept of original sin profoundly shaped Western thought, positing a corrupted will passed down through generations.
  • Thomas Aquinas: Building on Augustine and Aristotle, Aquinas in his Summa Theologica defines sin as a voluntary act or omission contrary to reason and divine law. He categorizes sins and explores their roots in human passions and the intellect's failure to guide the will towards the true good.

The Enigma of the Will: Freedom and Determinism

The will is the faculty of mind that chooses a course of action from a range of alternatives. The problem arises when we question the extent of its freedom. Is the will truly autonomous, or is it determined by external forces, internal predispositions, or even divine decree?

  • Aristotle: In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle emphasizes voluntary action as a prerequisite for moral responsibility. He distinguishes between involuntary actions (due to force or ignorance) and voluntary ones, asserting that moral choices stem from a deliberate will.
  • Immanuel Kant: Kant, in his ethical works like Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, places the will at the center of moral philosophy. For Kant, a truly moral act is one performed out of duty, dictated by a rational will that legislates universal moral laws. The will must be free to choose these laws; otherwise, morality itself is meaningless.

II. Historical Perspectives from the Great Books

The problem of sin and will has been a constant thread woven through the fabric of Western philosophy, evolving with each intellectual epoch.

Ancient Roots: Plato, Aristotle, and the Pursuit of Virtue

The ancient Greeks laid the groundwork for understanding moral failing, often linking it to ignorance or a lack of self-control rather than a malicious will.

  • Plato: In dialogues such as Protagoras and Republic, Plato suggests that evil stems from ignorance. No one willingly chooses evil; rather, they pursue what they mistakenly believe to be good. The will is guided by the intellect, and a corrupted intellect leads to moral error.
  • Aristotle: While affirming the voluntary nature of moral action, Aristotle also grappled with akrasia, or weakness of will. This is the phenomenon where one knows what is good but fails to act accordingly, succumbing to desires or passions. This highlights a crucial problem: even with knowledge, the will can falter.

The Christian Synthesis: Augustine and Aquinas on Sin and Grace

The advent of Christian thought brought a profound shift, introducing concepts like original sin and divine grace, which fundamentally reshaped the understanding of the will's capacity for good and evil.

  • Augustine: His reflections on the fall of humanity and the inherited propensity to sin ("original sin") introduced the idea that the human will is inherently problematic, biased towards self-love over love of God. Freedom of will exists, but it is a wounded freedom, requiring divine grace for true moral rectification.
  • Aquinas: Synthesizing Greek philosophy with Christian theology, Aquinas viewed the will as a rational appetite, always desiring what is presented to it as good by the intellect. Sin, therefore, often arises from an error in the intellect's judgment, or from the will's pursuit of a lesser, apparent good over a true good.

Enlightenment and Modern Challenges: Kant, Nietzsche, and Existentialism

The Enlightenment brought a renewed focus on human autonomy, while later thinkers challenged traditional moral frameworks, forcing a re-evaluation of good and evil and the will's role.

  • Immanuel Kant: For Kant, the will is the source of moral law. The problem of evil for Kant is not so much a weakness of will but a radical evil—a deliberate choice to prioritize self-love over the moral law. Yet, he insists on the possibility of moral regeneration through the autonomous will.
  • Friedrich Nietzsche: Nietzsche, a provocative voice from the Great Books, famously undertook a "revaluation of all values." He challenged the very concepts of good and evil as traditionally understood, viewing them as constructs often born from resentment. For Nietzsche, the "will to power" is the fundamental driving force, and morality is often a tool to tame or express this will. This perspective radically redefines the problem of sin, moving it away from a theological framework.

(Image: A detailed woodcut illustration from a 15th-century philosophical text, depicting a person standing at a crossroads. One path is bright and leads towards a figure representing "Virtue" or "Good," while the other is dark and winding, leading to shadowy figures symbolizing "Vice" or "Evil." Above the person's head, an ethereal hand points towards the virtuous path, while a demonic figure whispers temptations from the darker side, illustrating the internal struggle of the will.)

III. The Interplay: When Will Confronts Sin

The problem of sin and will is most acutely felt in the internal struggles of individuals and the moral fabric of societies.

The Internal Struggle: Conscience and Choice

Every person, at some point, experiences the tension between what they know to be good and the temptation to act otherwise. This internal conflict is the crucible where the will is tested.

  • The Dilemma of Akrasia: As Aristotle noted, knowing the good is not always sufficient. The will can be swayed by passion, habit, or external pressures, leading to actions that one later regrets or identifies as sinful.
  • The Role of Conscience: Conscience acts as an inner moral compass, often informing the will about the rightness or wrongness of an action. However, the problem of a misguided or dulled conscience further complicates the matter.

Consequences and Redemption: The Societal and Personal Impact

The choices of the will, particularly those leading to sin, have profound consequences, both for the individual and for the wider community.

  • Justice and Punishment: Societies establish systems of justice to address evil acts, seeking to restore balance and deter future sin. These systems implicitly acknowledge the freedom of the will and individual responsibility.
  • Redemption and Forgiveness: Philosophically, the possibility of redemption, self-improvement, and forgiveness speaks to the belief that the will can change, that individuals can turn away from past sin and strive towards good.

Key Thinkers and Their Contributions to the Problem of Sin and Will:

Philosopher Key Concept(s) Relevant Work(s)
Plato Ignorance as source of evil, Forms of the Good Republic, Protagoras
Aristotle Voluntary action, Akrasia (weakness of will) Nicomachean Ethics
Augustine of Hippo Original sin, Wounded will, Grace, Turning from God Confessions, City of God
Thomas Aquinas Rational appetite, Sin against reason/divine law Summa Theologica
Immanuel Kant Autonomous will, Duty, Radical evil Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals
Friedrich Nietzsche Will to power, Revaluation of values Beyond Good and Evil, Genealogy of Morality

IV. Contemporary Relevance: Why the Problem Persists

Even in a largely secularized world, the problem of sin and will retains its urgency, albeit often reframed in modern ethical and psychological terms.

Modern Ethics and the Shadow of Sin

Contemporary moral philosophy continues to grapple with human wrongdoing, even when avoiding the term "sin." Concepts like moral failure, wrongdoing, ethical transgression, and malfeasance are secular equivalents that still point to the same fundamental problem of individuals acting contrary to agreed-upon moral standards.

  • The enduring question remains: Why do individuals, often knowing the good, choose to inflict harm, act selfishly, or betray trust? This is the problem of the will in action, irrespective of theological labels.

Understanding the historical and philosophical discourse on sin and will provides invaluable tools for navigating the complexities of personal responsibility, accountability, and the pursuit of a meaningful life. The insights from the Great Books remind us that the struggle between our aspirations for good and our propensity for evil is a timeless aspect of the human condition.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine on Free Will and Evil"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Kant's Ethics and the Categorical Imperative Explained"

Conclusion

The Problem of Sin and Will is far from resolved; it is a perennial philosophical challenge that continues to provoke deep introspection and debate. From the ancient Greek emphasis on knowledge and virtue to the Christian preoccupation with original sin and grace, and the Enlightenment's focus on autonomous reason, the Great Books of the Western World offer a rich tapestry of thought on how the human will navigates the perilous terrain between good and evil. To engage with this problem is to confront the very essence of what it means to be human—to possess the capacity for profound moral choice, and to bear the responsibility for the paths we choose.

Share this post