The Problem of Sin and Will: A Philosophical Inquiry

The human condition is perpetually vexed by the tension between our aspirations for goodness and our undeniable propensity to err. At the heart of this enduring struggle lies the problem of sin and will, a philosophical conundrum that has captivated thinkers for millennia, shaping our understanding of morality, freedom, and the very nature of humanity. This pillar page delves into the intricate relationship between sin as a moral transgression and will as the faculty of choice, tracing its conceptual evolution through the intellectual giants chronicled in the Great Books of the Western World. We will explore how different epochs and philosophers have grappled with the origins of evil, the nature of free will, and the implications of our choices for both individual and collective destiny.

Unpacking the Core Concepts: Sin and Will

Before we embark on our historical and philosophical journey, it is imperative to establish a working understanding of our central terms. While often intertwined with theological doctrines, sin and will possess profound philosophical dimensions that transcend specific religious frameworks.

What is Sin?

Philosophically, sin can be understood not merely as a breach of divine law, but as a fundamental deviation from what is considered good or rational. It represents a failure to live up to one's moral potential, an act or state contrary to virtue, reason, or the ultimate human flourishing.

• Moral Transgression: An act, thought, or omission that violates an ethical principle or norm.
• Ignorance or Weakness: For some, sin stems from a lack of knowledge or an inability to act according to one's better judgment.
• Deliberate Choice: For others, sin is a conscious, voluntary turning away from the good.
• Original Sin: A theological concept, but one with significant philosophical implications concerning innate human corruption or a predisposition to evil.

What is Will?

The will is arguably the most crucial faculty in this discussion. It is the power of the mind to decide and initiate action. The nature of the will—whether it is truly free, determined, or influenced by reason and emotion—directly impacts our understanding of responsibility and the very possibility of sin.

• Free Will: The capacity of an agent to make choices that are not determined by prior events or external forces.
• Rational Will: The will as guided by reason, aiming towards what is perceived as good.
• Voluntarism: A philosophical position that emphasizes the will as primary over intellect or reason.
• Determinism: The belief that all events, including human actions, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will.

Ancient Echoes: Reason, Virtue, and the Seeds of Error

The ancient Greeks, while not employing the term "sin" in the Judeo-Christian sense, laid foundational stones for understanding moral failing and the role of the will.

• Plato (c. 428–348 BCE): For Plato, as explored in works like the Republic, evil often stemmed from ignorance. The will was seen as desiring the good, but individuals might err because they mistakenly perceive evil as good. The famous charioteer metaphor illustrates the struggle of the rational part of the soul (the charioteer) to control the spirited and appetitive parts, suggesting that a lack of control or proper understanding leads to moral missteps.
• Aristotle (384–322 BCE): In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle meticulously examines voluntary and involuntary actions. He argues that moral responsibility, and thus the possibility of praise or blame (akin to our concept of accountability for sin), applies only to voluntary actions. A person acts voluntarily when the originating principle of the action is within them and they are aware of the particular circumstances. Evil for Aristotle is a deficiency of virtue, a failure to hit the mean.

The Augustinian Revolution: A Corrupted Will

The arrival of St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) marked a seismic shift in the understanding of sin and will. Drawing heavily from his own experiences and Christian theology, Augustine's work, particularly Confessions and City of God, profoundly influenced Western thought.

Augustine argued vehemently against the Pelagian view that humans could achieve salvation purely through their own will and effort. For Augustine, the problem of sin was not merely one of ignorance but of a fundamentally corrupted will inherited through "original sin."

• The Will Turned Away from God: Augustine posited that the will, once perfectly free, became enslaved to its own desires after the Fall. It now has a perverse inclination towards lesser goods or even evil, even when it knows the good.
• The Problem of Evil: Augustine famously wrestled with how a benevolent God could allow evil. His solution was that evil is not a substance but a privation of good, a turning away from the highest good (God) by a free will.
• Freedom and Grace: True freedom, for Augustine, was not merely the ability to choose between good and evil, but the ability not to sin. This perfect freedom was lost, and only divine grace could restore the will to its proper orientation towards the good.

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting Saint Augustine in his study, perhaps with a quill in hand, surrounded by theological texts, with a subtle ray of divine light illuminating his face, symbolizing intellectual revelation and struggle with profound spiritual questions.)

Medieval Synthesis: Reason, Will, and Divine Law

The Scholastic philosophers of the Middle Ages, most notably Thomas Aquinas, sought to synthesize Augustinian thought with Aristotelian philosophy, offering a more nuanced view of the will's operation.

• Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): In his monumental Summa Theologica, Aquinas places the will within a rational framework. The intellect apprehends the good, and the will then moves towards it. While acknowledging the effects of original sin, Aquinas believed the will retains a natural inclination towards the good. Sin occurs when the will chooses a lesser good over a greater good, often due to a defect in practical reason or the influence of passions. However, for a sin to be truly mortal, it must involve full knowledge and deliberate consent of the will.

Philosopher	Key Idea on Sin	Key Idea on Will	Relationship to Good and Evil
Plato	Ignorance of the true Good; lack of control.	Desires the Good but can be misguided.	Evil is a consequence of ignorance, not deliberate choice.
Aristotle	Deficiency of virtue; voluntary action contrary to reason.	Faculty of voluntary action, guided by practical reason.	Good is the mean; Evil is excess or deficiency.
Augustine	Turning away from God; corrupted by Original Sin.	Enslaved to self-love; needs grace for true freedom.	Evil is a privation of Good; a chosen absence of Good.
Aquinas	Choosing a lesser good over a greater Good; defect in reason/passion.	Naturally inclined to the Good, but can be misled by intellect or passion.	Good is what is rational and ordered; Evil is a deviation.

The Modern Turn: Autonomy, Duty, and the Will to Power

The Enlightenment and subsequent philosophical movements challenged traditional notions of sin and placed greater emphasis on human autonomy and individual responsibility.

• Immanuel Kant (1724–1804): Kant radically reoriented the discussion, shifting the focus from external divine law to the internal law of reason. In works like Critique of Practical Reason and Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason, he argues that the moral will is autonomous, meaning it legislates its own law based on universal principles (the categorical imperative). For Kant, sin (or "radical evil") is not a consequence of ignorance or passion, but a deliberate choice of the will to subordinate moral law to self-interest, even when it knows better. It is a fundamental perversity of the maxims of the will.
• Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900): Nietzsche, a profound critic of traditional morality, dramatically challenged the very concepts of sin, good and evil. In Beyond Good and Evil and Thus Spoke Zarathustra, he argued that these terms were constructs, often serving to suppress the natural human will to power. He saw "sin" as a tool of slave morality, designed to weaken the strong and elevate the weak. For Nietzsche, the will is fundamentally a "will to power," a drive for growth, overcoming, and self-mastery, which should transcend conventional notions of good and evil.

The Enduring Problem: Freedom, Responsibility, and Human Nature

The problem of sin and will continues to resonate in contemporary philosophy, ethics, psychology, and even legal theory. It forces us to confront fundamental questions about human nature:

• Are we inherently flawed, or capable of perfectibility?
• To what extent are our choices truly free, or are they determined by genetics, environment, or unconscious desires?
• How do we assign moral responsibility if the will is not entirely free?
• Can society truly legislate against "sin," or only against its harmful manifestations?

The tension between our aspirations and our failings, between the ideal will and the actual choices we make, remains a central enigma of human existence. The great thinkers have offered profound insights, but the ultimate reconciliation of sin and will often falls to each individual, in their daily struggles with good and evil, choice, and consequence.

YouTube: Search for "Augustine Free Will Evil" or "Kant Radical Evil Explained" for deeper dives into these pivotal philosophical perspectives.

📹 Related Video: What is Philosophy?

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Problem of Sin and Will philosophy"