The Enduring Conundrum: The Problem of Sin and Will

The human condition, in its most profound philosophical sense, is often defined by a central, vexing question: Why do we do what we know is wrong? This isn't merely a matter of occasional lapse, but a pervasive problem that has haunted thinkers from the earliest civilizations to the present day. At its heart lies the intricate relationship between sin and will, concepts that serve as cornerstones for understanding morality, responsibility, and the very nature of Good and Evil. This pillar page delves into this profound philosophical challenge, tracing its historical development through the Great Books of the Western World and exploring its persistent relevance to our lives. We will examine how different epochs and intellects have grappled with the human capacity for transgression, the mysterious power of choice, and the inherent tension between our aspirations for the Good and our frequent descent into Evil.

Defining the Terms: Sin, Will, Good, and Evil

Before we embark on a historical and analytical journey, it’s crucial to establish a working understanding of our core concepts. These terms, while seemingly straightforward, carry immense philosophical weight and have been interpreted in myriad ways.

The Nature of Sin

Sin is not simply a mistake or an error in judgment. Philosophically, and particularly in its theological origins, it implies a deliberate transgression against a known moral or divine law, or a deviation from what is understood as the Good.

  • Theological Perspective: Often rooted in a relationship with a divine order, where sin is an offense against God, leading to spiritual estrangement.
  • Philosophical Perspective: Can be understood as an act that violates rational principles, ethical duties, or the inherent Good of human flourishing. It implies moral culpability, an intentional choice for the Evil over the Good.

The Enigma of the Will

The will is arguably the most fascinating and elusive faculty of human consciousness. It is our capacity for choice, intention, and agency – the power to decide and to act.

  • Free Will vs. Determinism: A foundational problem in philosophy. Is our will truly free, or are our choices predetermined by external forces, genetic predispositions, or psychological conditioning? The existence of sin profoundly hinges on the assumption of a free will.
  • Volition and Deliberation: The will involves both the internal process of deliberation (weighing options) and the external act of volition (making a choice and acting upon it).

Good and Evil as Moral Coordinates

These terms provide the framework within which sin and will operate. They are the poles of our moral compass.

  • The Good: What is intrinsically valuable, desirable, and promotes flourishing. It can be objective (Platonic Forms, divine law) or subjective (individual preference, utility).
  • Evil: The privation or absence of Good, or that which causes harm, suffering, or moral decay. It is often understood in relation to the Good that it negates or corrupts.

The problem of sin and will emerges precisely because we often comprehend the Good and the Evil, yet our will frequently directs us towards the latter, even against our better judgment.

Historical Trajectories: Great Minds Grappling with the Problem

The Great Books of the Western World offer a rich tapestry of thought on this enduring problem. From ancient Greece to modern existentialism, philosophers and theologians have wrestled with the peculiar human capacity for self-sabotage.

Ancient Roots: Plato and Aristotle

The earliest attempts to understand sin (or moral wrongdoing) often centered on the role of knowledge.

  • Socrates and Plato: Ignorance as the Root of Evil
    • Socrates famously asserted that "no one does evil willingly." For him, wrongdoing stemmed from ignorance of the Good. If one truly understood what was Good, they would inevitably choose it. The problem was intellectual, not volitional.
    • Plato, in works like the Republic, expands on this, suggesting that a well-ordered soul, guided by reason, would naturally pursue the Good. Evil arises from the disharmony of the soul, where appetites or spirit usurp reason's role.
  • Aristotle: The Problem of Akrasia (Incontinence of Will)
    • In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle challenges the Socratic view. He introduces the concept of akrasia, or weakness of will. This is the state where an individual knows what the Good is, understands the better course of action, but nevertheless chooses the worse.
    • Aristotle's akrasia marks a crucial shift, recognizing that the problem isn't always a lack of knowledge, but a failure of the will to follow reason, often due to overwhelming passions or desires.

Augustine of Hippo: The Genesis of Sin and the Burden of Free Will

Perhaps no figure has shaped the Western understanding of sin and will more profoundly than St. Augustine of Hippo, particularly in his Confessions and City of God.

  • Original Sin: Augustine introduced the concept of Original Sin, arguing that humanity inherited a corrupted nature from Adam's fall. This wasn't merely a bad example but a fundamental flaw in the human will. The problem of sin became inherent, deeply ingrained in our very being.
  • The Corrupted Will: For Augustine, the will (voluntas) is the source of moral action, but after the Fall, it is fractured. We possess liberum arbitrium (free judgment or choice), but our will is no longer perfectly oriented towards the Good. It is prone to Evil, even when we strive for righteousness. "I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do." (Romans 7:19, central to Augustine's thought).
  • The Problem of Evil: Augustine wrestled with how an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly Good God could allow sin and suffering. His solution centered on free will: God grants humans the freedom to choose, and sin is the misuse of this freedom, a turning away from God, not something God creates. Evil is a privation of Good, an absence, not a positive force.

Thomas Aquinas: Reconciling Reason and Revelation

St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, synthesized Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology, offering a systematic account of will, sin, and Good and Evil.

  • Will Follows Intellect (but can err): Aquinas largely agreed with Aristotle that the will naturally desires the Good as presented by the intellect. However, the intellect can err, presenting a seeming Good that is actually Evil.
  • Sin as a Privation: Like Augustine, Aquinas viewed sin as a privation of the Good, a deviation from rational order and divine law. The will chooses a lesser Good or an apparent Good that is ultimately harmful, failing to adhere to the ultimate Good (God).

Modern Philosophy: Kant and the Autonomous Will

Immanuel Kant, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals and Critique of Practical Reason, radically redefined the role of the will.

  • The Good Will: For Kant, the only thing that is Good without qualification is a Good Will. This is a will that acts purely out of duty, from respect for the moral law, not from inclination or expected consequences.
  • Autonomy and Moral Law: The will is autonomous when it legislates the moral law for itself. Sin (or moral wrongdoing) occurs when the will acts on maxims that cannot be universalized, or when it treats others (or oneself) merely as a means to an end, rather than as ends in themselves. The problem of sin becomes a failure of rationality and a disrespect for the inherent dignity of moral agents.

Existentialism and the Anguish of Choice: Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, Sartre

The 19th and 20th centuries brought new perspectives on the burden of will and the nature of sin, particularly with the rise of existentialism.

  • Kierkegaard: The Leap of Faith and the Anguish of Freedom
    • Søren Kierkegaard, in works like Fear and Trembling, highlights the profound responsibility and anxiety that come with radical freedom. The individual stands alone before God, making choices that define their essence. Sin is not just a violation of law, but a failure to become one's true self before God, often rooted in despair or a refusal to choose.
  • Dostoevsky: The Abyss of Free Will
    • Fyodor Dostoevsky, in novels like Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov, explores the terrifying implications of absolute freedom. If there is no God, "everything is permitted." The will, unconstrained by divine law, can choose the most heinous Evil, leading to profound spiritual torment and the ultimate problem of nihilism.
  • Sartre: Condemned to be Free
    • Jean-Paul Sartre, in Being and Nothingness, famously declared that "man is condemned to be free." We exist first, then define our essence through our choices. There is no predetermined Good or Evil; we must create our own values. Sin, in this context, might be understood as "bad faith"—the attempt to deny our freedom and responsibility by blaming external factors or claiming to be determined.

The Interplay: When the Will Chooses Sin

The core problem remains: Why, with an understanding of Good and Evil, does the will often choose sin?

Philosophical Perspective Primary Reason for Choosing Sin/Evil Emphasis
Socrates/Plato Ignorance of the true Good Intellect
Aristotle Akrasia (weakness of will), passions Will/Passions
Augustine Corrupted will (Original Sin) Will/Grace
Aquinas Intellect presenting apparent good Intellect/Will
Kant Failure to act from duty, heteronomy Will/Duty
Existentialists Anguish of freedom, bad faith Freedom/Responsibility

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting the temptation of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, with the serpent subtly intertwined around the tree. Eve is shown reaching for the apple, while Adam looks on with a contemplative or hesitant expression, emphasizing the moment of choice and the subsequent fall, symbolizing the origin of sin and the exercise of free will.)

Contemporary Echoes: The Problem in a Secular Age

Even in an increasingly secularized world, the problem of sin and will persists, albeit often reframed.

  • Secular Ethics: Without traditional concepts of sin, how do we account for moral failure? Terms like "moral error," "wrongdoing," "bad choices," or "unethical behavior" attempt to describe the same phenomenon of choosing Evil over Good, but often lack the profound spiritual or existential weight of sin.
  • Neuroscience and Determinism: Modern scientific inquiries into the brain and consciousness often raise questions about free will. If our choices are ultimately the product of neuronal firings and chemical processes, are we truly free? If not, what becomes of responsibility and the concept of sin? This challenges the very foundation upon which the problem has traditionally been built.
  • The Persistence of "Evil": Regardless of whether one believes in sin, the existence of malevolent acts, suffering, and human cruelty remains a stark reality. The problem of why humans inflict such harm upon themselves and others continues to demand explanation, even if the language shifts from theological sin to psychological dysfunction or sociological factors.

Conclusion: The Unresolved Tension

The problem of sin and will stands as one of the most enduring and perplexing challenges in philosophy and human experience. From the ancient Greek inquiries into the nature of knowledge and virtue, through Augustine's profound wrestling with a corrupted will, to Kant's emphasis on autonomous moral duty, and the existentialist's embrace of radical freedom, the question persists: Why do we choose to deviate from the Good we often recognize?

This journey through the Great Books reveals not a definitive answer, but a continuous, evolving exploration of human nature itself. The tension between our rational understanding of Good and Evil and the mysterious, often recalcitrant, power of our will remains a central mystery. It forces us to confront our own capacity for both virtue and vice, and to perpetually strive for a deeper understanding of what it means to be a moral agent in a complex world. The problem of sin and will is not merely an academic exercise; it is the very fabric of our ethical lives, compelling us to reflect on every choice we make and the kind of beings we aspire to be.

Further Exploration

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine Free Will Problem of Evil"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Kant Categorical Imperative Good Will Explained"

Share this post