The Problem of Sin and Desire and Problem

The Problem of Sin and Desire: A Philosophical Inquiry

The human condition is perpetually caught in a profound tension between what we crave and what we perceive as right or wrong. This intricate dance between desire and sin forms one of philosophy's most enduring and vexing problems. From ancient ethical treatises to theological doctrines, thinkers across the ages have grappled with how our natural inclinations intersect with moral imperatives, often finding that the very engines of human action—our desires—can lead us down paths deemed sinful. This article delves into the philosophical bedrock of this conflict, drawing upon the wisdom enshrined in the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate the multifaceted nature of sin, the compelling force of desire, and their complex relationship in defining Good and Evil.

Unpacking the Core Problem: Desire's Allure and Sin's Shadow

At its heart, the problem of sin and desire is the struggle to reconcile our internal drives with external or internal moral codes. Is desire inherently corrupt, a gateway to transgression? Or is it a neutral force, capable of leading to both virtue and vice depending on its direction and governance? Western thought offers a rich tapestry of answers, often defining sin not merely as an act, but as a state of being, a deviation from a prescribed ideal, or a willful turning away from the good. Desire, on the other hand, is the fundamental engine of human motivation—the longing for pleasure, knowledge, power, or even spiritual fulfillment. The philosophical challenge lies in understanding when this potent force transitions from natural inclination to moral failing.

Key Concepts in the Sin-Desire Nexus:

Sin: Often understood as an offense against divine law, a transgression of moral principles, or a deviation from human flourishing.
Desire: The longing or craving for something, ranging from basic appetites (food, sex) to higher aspirations (knowledge, love, justice).
Good and Evil: The moral framework against which desires and actions are judged, often shaped by metaphysical, theological, or ethical systems.

Ancient Insights: Plato, Aristotle, and the Governance of Desire

The foundations of this problem are laid in classical Greek philosophy, where the nature of the soul and the pursuit of the good life were paramount.

Plato's Tripartite Soul and the Charioteer

In Plato's Republic and Phaedrus, the soul is famously divided into three parts:

Reason (Logistikon): Seeks truth and wisdom, ought to rule.
Spirit (Thymoeides): Seeks honor and victory, an ally to reason.
Appetite (Epithymetikon): Seeks bodily pleasures and material gain.

Plato likens the soul to a charioteer (reason) guiding two winged horses: one noble (spirit) and one unruly (appetite). Sin, or rather injustice and moral failing, arises when appetite overpowers reason. Unchecked desire for pleasure or wealth leads to a disordered soul, preventing the individual from achieving eudaimonia (human flourishing) and living a life of virtue. For Plato, the problem isn't desire itself, but its lack of proper governance, leading to a state of internal disharmony that manifests as evil or injustice.

Aristotle and the Golden Mean: Virtue as Directed Desire

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, offers a more nuanced view. He does not condemn desire outright but sees it as a natural part of human experience that must be properly trained and directed. Virtue, for Aristotle, is a mean between two extremes of desire or action—excess and deficiency. For example, courage is the mean between cowardice (deficiency of desire to face danger) and rashness (excessive desire to face danger).

Aristotle's Perspective on Desire and Moral Failing:

Aspect	Description	Relation to Sin/Evil
Desire	A natural human faculty, essential for motivation and action.	Not inherently bad, but requires proper direction.
Virtue	A disposition to act in the right way, developed through habit and reason.	Achieved when desires are aligned with reason and the mean.
Vice	Excess or deficiency of desire or action.	A form of moral failing, a departure from the good.
Akrasia	Weakness of will; knowing what is good but failing to do it due to desire.	A key instance where desire overcomes reason, leading to moral error.

Here, the problem is not the existence of desire, but the failure of reason and habit to cultivate it towards virtuous ends. Sin or moral failing arises from a misdirection or an imbalance of desires.

The Abrahamic Perspective: Original Sin and the Corrupted Will

With the advent of Abrahamic religions, particularly Christianity, the problem of sin and desire takes on a theological dimension rooted in the concept of Original Sin.

Augustine of Hippo: The Will, Libido Dominandi, and the Fall

Saint Augustine, a pivotal figure in Western thought, radically reshaped the understanding of sin and desire. For Augustine, after the Fall, human nature became fundamentally flawed. Desire, particularly the libido dominandi (lust for domination) and concupiscence (disordered desire), became a powerful force pulling humanity away from God.

Augustine argued that true sin is a willful turning away from God, a love of self over a love of God. Our desires, which were once perfectly ordered in paradise, became unruly and often lead us astray. The problem is not just misdirected desire, but a corrupted will that chooses lesser goods over the ultimate good, often swayed by powerful, disordered desires. This profound shift posits that evil is not a substance but a privation of good, a lack where good ought to be, often caused by our own errant desires and choices.

(Image: A classical painting depicting the Expulsion from the Garden of Eden, with Adam and Eve showing expressions of shame and regret, illustrating the moment sin entered the human condition and the subsequent struggle with desire.)

Thomas Aquinas: Sin as a Privation, Desire for a Disordered Good

Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology in his Summa Theologica, further refined the concept. For Aquinas, sin is fundamentally a privation of good, a defect in a rational act. Every action is directed towards some perceived good, but sin occurs when one desires a particular good (e.g., pleasure, wealth) in a disordered way, elevating it above the ultimate good (God) or violating moral order.

Aquinas posits that human beings naturally desire the good. The problem arises when reason, clouded by passion or ignorance, misidentifies a particular good as the supreme good, or pursues a legitimate good through illicit means. Thus, desire itself is natural, but when it is not properly ordered by reason and divine law, it leads to sin.

The Enlightenment era continued to grapple with the problem of sin and desire, albeit often reframing it in secular terms of duty, rationality, and societal order.

Immanuel Kant: Duty vs. Inclination

Immanuel Kant, in his ethical philosophy, drew a sharp distinction between actions performed from duty and actions performed from inclination (desire). For Kant, a truly moral action is one performed solely out of respect for the moral law, not out of any personal desire or anticipated outcome. Acting from desire, even if it leads to a good result, lacks true moral worth because it is contingent and self-interested.

The problem for Kant is how to ensure that our actions are guided by universalizable moral principles (the Categorical Imperative) rather than by our fluctuating, subjective desires. While he doesn't use the term "sin" in a theological sense, acting against duty due to inclination could be seen as a moral failing, a form of evil in its disregard for rational moral law.

Hobbes and Rousseau: Desire in the State of Nature

Philosophers of the social contract theory, such as Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, explored how human desire shapes society and the need for governance.

Hobbes: In Leviathan, Hobbes argues that in the "state of nature," human beings are driven by a perpetual and restless desire for power, leading to a "war of all against all." This unchecked desire, a form of collective sin or moral anarchy, necessitates a strong sovereign to impose order and prevent chaos.
Rousseau: In Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau suggests that in the natural state, humans are guided by self-preservation and pity. It is the development of society and the desire for property, status, and recognition that introduces vice and inequality, leading to a form of social evil.

These thinkers, though not using "sin" in a theological context, highlight how unbridled or misdirected human desire can lead to profound societal problems and forms of collective evil.

The Enduring Problem: Reconciling Desire and Morality

The problem of sin and desire remains a central philosophical challenge. Is desire a dangerous beast to be caged, a neutral force to be guided, or a divine spark to be purified? The Great Books of the Western World reveal a consistent thread: human flourishing hinges on how we understand, manage, and direct our desires in relation to moral frameworks of Good and Evil. Whether through reason, divine grace, or societal structures, the quest to align our deepest longings with our highest ideals is an ongoing, essential human endeavor.

YouTube:

"Plato's Republic: The Tripartite Soul Explained"
"Augustine's Confessions: Original Sin and Free Will"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Problem of Sin and Desire philosophy"