The Enduring Conundrum: Unpacking the Problem of Sin and Desire

Summary: The problem of sin and desire lies at the heart of much philosophical and theological inquiry, representing a fundamental tension in the human condition. From antiquity to the medieval era, thinkers grappled with how our inherent desires, often perceived as natural, can lead to actions deemed sinful, thereby obscuring the path to true good and perpetuating evil. This article explores the intricate relationship between desire and sin, drawing insights from the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate how philosophers have attempted to define, understand, and perhaps even resolve this enduring human struggle.

The Problem Defined: An Intimate Philosophical Struggle

The human experience is inextricably linked to desire. We desire knowledge, love, power, pleasure, and peace. Yet, history and personal experience alike reveal that these very desires can lead us astray, culminating in what many traditions label as sin. Is desire inherently problematic, or is it merely its misdirection that constitutes sin? This is the core problem we confront: understanding the boundary where natural inclination transforms into moral transgression, and how this dynamic shapes our understanding of Good and Evil.

Philosophers across millennia, from Plato to Aquinas, have recognized this tension not as a mere religious tenet, but as a profound psychological and ethical dilemma. It questions the very nature of human agency, freedom, and our capacity for both virtue and vice.

Ancient Roots: Desire as a Path to Virtue or Vice

The earliest explorations into the nature of desire and its moral implications can be found in the philosophical traditions of ancient Greece.

  • Plato: In works like The Republic, Plato posits a tripartite soul: reason, spirit, and appetite. Desire, particularly appetitive desire (for food, drink, sex, wealth), is not inherently evil, but becomes problematic when it overpowers reason. True virtue, for Plato, involves ordering these desires under the guidance of reason, aspiring towards the Good, the ultimate Form. When appetite dominates, the soul becomes disordered, leading to injustice and what could be considered a form of sin against one's own nature and the ideal state.
  • Aristotle: Building on Plato, Aristotle in Nicomachean Ethics discusses desire (orexis) as a fundamental aspect of human motivation. He distinguishes between rational and irrational desires. The pursuit of eudaimonia (flourishing or true happiness) involves cultivating virtues that allow us to desire the right things, at the right time, in the right way. Sin, in an Aristotelian sense, would be a deviation from the mean, an excess or deficiency in our actions driven by disordered desires, preventing us from achieving our natural telos (purpose).

For these ancient thinkers, the problem was largely one of misdirection or imbalance rather than an inherent corruption of desire itself.

The Christian Turn: Augustine and the Weight of Original Sin

With the advent of Christian thought, particularly through the monumental works of St. Augustine, the understanding of sin and desire took a profound turn.

  • Augustine of Hippo: In Confessions and City of God, Augustine introduces the concept of Original Sin. For Augustine, human desire, particularly after the Fall, is not merely disordered but corrupted. This corruption, known as concupiscence, means that even our good desires are tainted by a tendency towards self-love over love of God. Sin, therefore, isn't just an act, but a condition stemming from a fundamental perversion of the will, a turning away from the immutable Good (God) towards mutable, transient goods. This makes the problem of sin and desire far more pervasive and difficult to overcome through human effort alone.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting St. Augustine in deep contemplation, perhaps writing, with a skull or an hourglass on his desk, symbolizing mortality and the passage of time, while light streams in from a window suggesting divine inspiration or insight.)

Scholastic Synthesis: Aquinas on Disordered Desire and Natural Law

Centuries later, Thomas Aquinas, drawing heavily on Aristotle and integrating Christian theology, offered a systematic framework for understanding sin and desire in Summa Theologica.

  • Thomas Aquinas: Aquinas views sin as a privation of good, a lack of what ought to be present in a moral act. Desire, for Aquinas, is natural, as humans are drawn to what they perceive as good. The problem arises when this desire is disordered. A disordered desire seeks a lesser good in a way that obstructs a greater good, or seeks a good outside the bounds of natural law and divine law. For instance, desiring food is natural, but gluttony (an excessive, disordered desire for food) is sinful because it harms the body, distracts from spiritual goods, and violates temperance. Aquinas meticulously categorizes sins based on their object, their motive, and their relation to specific virtues and vices, always linking them back to a deviation from the ultimate Good.

The Interplay: Desire, Sin, and the Calculus of Good and Evil

The journey through these philosophical landscapes reveals a continuous thread: the inherent human capacity for desire, and the ever-present challenge of channeling it towards Good rather than succumbing to Evil.

Key Philosophical Perspectives on Sin and Desire:

  • Plato/Aristotle: Sin as a result of unreasoned or imbalanced desire, a deviation from the pursuit of true flourishing (eudaimonia). The solution lies in rational self-mastery and virtue.
  • Augustine: Sin as a consequence of corrupted desire (concupiscence) stemming from Original Sin, a fundamental turning away from God. The solution requires divine grace.
  • Aquinas: Sin as disordered desire, seeking a particular good in a way that violates natural law or obstructs a greater good. The solution involves aligning one's will with reason and divine law.

This historical overview highlights that the problem is not merely academic; it's deeply personal and societal. Our desires shape our actions, and our actions, in turn, define our moral landscape. Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of sin and desire provides a crucial lens through which to examine our own motivations and strive for a more virtuous existence.

Conclusion: An Ever-Present Human Struggle

The problem of sin and desire remains a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry because it speaks to the core of what it means to be human. From the ancient Greek emphasis on reason and balance to the Christian focus on the will's orientation, and the scholastic synthesis of natural law, these foundational texts offer invaluable insights. They challenge us to reflect on the nature of our deepest longings and the responsibility we bear in directing them towards the cultivation of Good and the avoidance of Evil. The journey to understand and master our desires is, perhaps, the most profound philosophical task of all.

YouTube: "Augustine Confessions Explained"
YouTube: "Aquinas Summa Theologica Sin"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Problem of Sin and Desire philosophy"

Share this post