The Problem of Sin and Desire

The human condition is perpetually entangled in the complex interplay of sin and desire. At its core, this is a philosophical problem that probes the very essence of human agency, morality, and our pursuit of the good amidst the temptations of evil. This article explores how Western thought, from ancient Greece to early Christian philosophy, has grappled with the inherent tension between our deepest longings and our moral failings, revealing a persistent struggle to reconcile our appetites with our aspirations. We delve into how philosophers have defined these terms, understood their origins, and proposed paths to navigate this fundamental human predicament.

Unpacking the Core: A Philosophical Lens

To truly comprehend the problem of sin and desire, we must first establish a working understanding of these potent concepts as they have been debated across millennia. These are not mere psychological states but foundational elements in the construction of ethics, metaphysics, and our understanding of human nature.

What is Desire? The Engine of Our Being

Desire is, in many philosophical traditions, the fundamental engine of human action. From the yearning for knowledge to the craving for pleasure, it drives us.

Plato, in works like The Republic, conceptualized desire (epithymia) as one part of the soul, often irrational and associated with bodily appetites, needing to be guided by reason (logos). Without such guidance, desire could lead to imbalance and injustice.
Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, viewed desires (orexis) as natural impulses, some rational, some irrational. The key was to cultivate virtues that allowed one to desire the right things, at the right time, in the right measure, aiming for eudaimonia (flourishing or true happiness). He believed that while desires for pleasure are natural, a virtuous person finds pleasure in noble activities.
St. Augustine, later, saw desire fundamentally shaped by love. Our desires are ultimately directed towards something we love. The problem arises when our love, and thus our desires, are disordered—turned away from the ultimate good (God) towards lesser, transient goods.

What is Sin? The Transgression and the Turning Away

While desire can be neutral or even positive, sin introduces a moral dimension, often implying a transgression or a failure to achieve a moral standard.

Ancient Greek Thought: While not using the term "sin" in a theological sense, concepts of hamartia (a tragic flaw or error in judgment, leading to misfortune) or hubris (excessive pride leading to downfall) served a similar function, highlighting human fallibility and the consequences of moral or intellectual missteps. The problem here was often intellectual — a lack of knowledge leading to bad choices.
Abrahamic Religions: Here, sin takes on a distinct theological meaning: a transgression against divine law, a rebellion against God's will, or a failure to live up to a covenant. It's not merely an error but a deliberate turning away from the good. Augustine's understanding, deeply influential, posits sin as a disordered desire, where the will chooses a lesser good over the ultimate Good.

The problem of sin and desire thus emerges from this tension: our natural inclinations and appetites, when unchecked or misdirected, can lead us away from what is truly good, resulting in moral failing or spiritual estrangement.

The Ancient Roots: Desire, Virtue, and the Good

Philosophers of antiquity laid crucial groundwork for understanding the relationship between human longing and moral conduct. Their insights reveal a sophisticated awareness of the challenges inherent in directing our inner drives towards a flourishing life.

Plato's Chariot Allegory: Reason's Dominion

Plato's famous allegory from Phaedrus vividly illustrates the internal struggle. The soul is likened to a charioteer (reason) guiding two winged horses: one noble and spirited (thumos), the other unruly and driven by base desires (epithymia). The charioteer's task is to control the wild horse and direct both towards the realm of Forms, particularly the Form of the Good. When reason fails, the desires run rampant, leading to imbalance and moral degradation. The problem here is a lack of proper governance of the soul.

Aristotle's Ethics: Cultivating Virtuous Desires

Aristotle, while acknowledging the power of desire, emphasized the role of habit and practical wisdom (phronesis) in shaping it. For Aristotle, virtue is a mean between two extremes of desire or action. For instance, courage is the mean between cowardice (deficient desire to face danger) and rashness (excessive desire for danger). The problem for Aristotle is not desire itself, but a lack of training and reason to guide desires towards their proper objects and in their proper measure. The truly virtuous person desires to do what is good.

The Abrahamic Shift: Sin as Disordered Desire

With the advent and development of Abrahamic religions, particularly Christianity, the problem of sin took on a profound and pervasive theological dimension, inextricably linking it to the nature of human desire.

Augustine and the Weight of Original Sin

St. Augustine of Hippo, a pivotal figure in Western thought, radically reshaped the understanding of sin and desire. In works like Confessions and City of God, he argued that sin is not merely an action but a state, a fundamental turning away from God, the ultimate Good. This "turning away" manifests as disordered desire – concupiscence – where our love is misdirected towards temporal pleasures and worldly possessions rather than divine love.

Augustine's concept of Original Sin posits that humanity inherited a corrupted will from Adam's fall. This corruption means that even our natural desires, though not inherently evil, are prone to being disordered. We find ourselves desiring things that lead us away from our true good, creating an internal conflict between what we know is right and what our corrupted will inclines us to do. This is the profound problem of the human condition: a will that is both free and yet enslaved by its own inclinations.

(Image: A classical painting depicting Adam and Eve's expulsion from the Garden of Eden, with Eve gazing back with a mixture of regret and longing, while Adam appears resolute but burdened, symbolizing the human fall and the introduction of sin and disordered desire into the human experience. The serpent subtly slithers in the background.)

The Struggle Between Flesh and Spirit

This Augustinian framework profoundly influenced subsequent theological and philosophical discourse, highlighting the enduring problem of the "flesh" (representing base desires and worldly attachments) warring against the "spirit" (representing the higher aspirations towards good and God). This internal conflict is a central theme in many spiritual traditions, emphasizing the constant need for vigilance, self-control, and divine grace to redirect desire towards the truly good.

Navigating Good and Evil: Modern Perspectives

While the theological emphasis on sin might have waned in some philosophical circles, the problem of desire and its potential for leading us towards or away from the good (or even evil) remains a central concern.

Kant and the Moral Law

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Practical Reason, shifted the focus from desire as a primary motivator to duty. For Kant, moral action is not driven by desire or inclination, but by adherence to the moral law, a categorical imperative derived from reason. Acting from desire, even if it leads to a good outcome, is not truly moral; true morality springs from duty alone. Here, the problem is not so much sin in the theological sense, but a failure to act purely from duty, allowing desire to pollute the moral will.

Nietzsche's Revaluation: Beyond Good and Evil

Friedrich Nietzsche, in works like Beyond Good and Evil, radically challenged traditional notions of sin and evil. He saw these concepts, particularly as defined by Christian morality, as instruments of a "slave morality" designed to suppress natural human desires and instincts, especially the "will to power." For Nietzsche, the problem was not desire itself, but the denial of desire, which he believed led to weakness and decadence. He called for a revaluation of all values, embracing strong, life-affirming desires to create new, self-overcoming individuals.

The Enduring Predicament and Paths Forward

The problem of sin and desire is a perennial one, reflecting the inherent complexities of human nature. Whether viewed through a theological lens of divine transgression or a secular lens of moral failing, the core struggle remains: how do we reconcile our powerful inner longings with our aspirations for what is right, virtuous, and ultimately good?

This journey through the Great Books reveals a spectrum of approaches to this fundamental human problem:

Rational Control: Emphasized by Plato and Aristotle, suggesting that reason must guide and moderate our desires.
Spiritual Transformation: Central to Augustinian thought, advocating for a reorientation of desire towards divine love and grace.
Duty and Autonomy: Kant's focus on acting from pure reason and moral law, independent of desire.
Self-Overcoming: Nietzsche's call to affirm and direct desire towards personal power and creation.

Ultimately, the problem of sin and desire is a call to self-awareness, an invitation to understand the forces that shape our choices, and a challenge to consciously direct our lives towards a chosen ideal of the good. It is a testament to the enduring human quest for meaning and morality in a world brimming with both temptation and potential.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine Confessions Sin Desire"