The Problem of Sin and Desire and Problem

The Enduring Problem of Sin and Desire: A Philosophical Inquiry

This article explores the profound philosophical problem of sin and desire, a perennial tension within human experience that has captivated thinkers for millennia. We will delve into how philosophers from the Great Books of the Western World have grappled with the nature of human desire, its potential for both good and evil, and its intricate relationship with the concept of sin. From ancient Greek rationalism to Abrahamic theological insights, we uncover the diverse attempts to understand, manage, and transcend the often-conflicting impulses that shape our moral landscape.

Unpacking the Core Problem: Desire's Dual Nature

At the heart of the human condition lies a fundamental problem: our innate capacity for desire. From the simplest biological urges for food and shelter to the loftiest aspirations for knowledge, beauty, and love, desire propels us forward. Yet, it is precisely this powerful force that is often implicated in acts of sin and the perpetration of evil. How can the same wellspring of human motivation lead to such divergent outcomes? This is the central philosophical conundrum we seek to understand.

Philosophers have long recognized the dual potential of desire:

Constructive Desire: Drives for self-improvement, creativity, connection, and the pursuit of truth and justice.
Destructive Desire: Leads to avarice, lust, envy, and actions that harm oneself or others, often understood as sinful.

The challenge lies in discerning when desire serves the good and when it veers into the realm of evil, becoming a source of moral transgression.

Ancient Greek Perspectives: Reason, Appetite, and Virtue

The earliest philosophical inquiries into desire within the Great Books tradition often framed it within the context of human reason and the pursuit of the good life.

Plato's Tripartite Soul and Disordered Desires

Plato, in his Republic, famously posited a tripartite soul:

Reason (Logistikon): Seeks truth and wisdom, guides the soul.
Spirit (Thymoeides): Emotions like honor, anger, and courage, allied with reason.
Appetite (Epithymetikon): Basic physical desires for food, drink, sex, and material possessions.

For Plato, the problem arises when the appetites, unchecked by reason, dominate the soul. This leads to disordered desires and a life of imbalance, preventing the individual from achieving true goodness or justice. Sin, in a Platonic sense, is a failure of reason to control these lower desires, leading to actions that are not in harmony with one's true, rational self.

Aristotle and the Cultivation of Virtuous Desire

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, offered a more nuanced view. He recognized that desire itself is not inherently bad; rather, it is its direction and intensity that determine its moral quality. For Aristotle, the goal is eudaimonia (flourishing), achieved through virtuous action. Virtue lies in the mean between extremes, and desire must be trained and habituated to align with reason.

Philosophical View on Desire	Key Concept	Relationship to Sin/Evil
Plato	Tripartite Soul	Disordered appetites lead to imbalance; failure of reason to control.
Aristotle	Virtue as a Mean	Desire itself is neutral; becomes virtuous or vicious through habituation and alignment with reason.

For Aristotle, sin or moral failing is not merely having a desire, but acting upon it intemperately or in a way that deviates from the rational mean, thus failing to cultivate one's character towards good.

The Abrahamic Challenge: Sin, Original Sin, and the Will

With the advent of Abrahamic traditions, particularly Christianity, the concept of sin took on a theological dimension, profoundly influencing the understanding of desire.

(Image: A detailed classical painting depicting Adam and Eve's expulsion from the Garden of Eden, emphasizing their expressions of shame and regret, with a serpent subtly visible in the background, symbolizing temptation and the origin of sin.)

St. Augustine: The Will's Corruption and Disordered Love

St. Augustine of Hippo, a pivotal figure in the Great Books, radically reshaped the discourse on sin and desire through his doctrine of Original Sin, as articulated in Confessions and City of God. For Augustine, humanity inherited a fallen nature from Adam, resulting in a corrupted will. This corruption manifests as concupiscence, a tendency towards disordered desires that pull us away from God.

Augustine argued that true good lies in loving God above all else. Sin is fundamentally a misdirection of love – loving created things more than the Creator, or loving them in an inordinate way. Our desires, though natural, become problematic because our will is inclined towards lesser goods rather than the ultimate Good. The problem is not merely a lack of rational control, but a deeper spiritual ailment affecting the very source of our choices.

St. Thomas Aquinas: Intellect, Will, and the Absence of Good

St. Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology in his Summa Theologica, further refined the understanding. He posited that humans naturally desire the good. However, sin occurs when the intellect presents an apparent good to the will, which then chooses it over a true good. Sin is not a positive act of choosing evil for its own sake, but rather a turning away from the true Good (God) towards a lesser, finite good.

For Aquinas, desire is a movement of the appetitive faculty towards an object perceived as good. The problem of sin arises when our intellect errs in its judgment of what constitutes a true good, or when our will, influenced by passions or habits, chooses an apparent good that is ultimately harmful or contrary to divine law.

The Interplay: When Desire Becomes Sin

The relationship between desire and sin is not always straightforward. Is desire itself sinful? Most philosophers, particularly within the Christian tradition, distinguish between the inclination to desire and the act of yielding to it.

Temptation vs. Sin: Having a desire for something considered evil (e.g., envy, lust) is often seen as temptation, a test. It becomes sin when the will consents to that desire and acts upon it, or deliberately dwells upon it with approval.
Misdirected Desire: Sin often arises from a legitimate desire that is misdirected or taken to an extreme. For instance, the desire for comfort is natural, but unchecked, it can lead to sloth or gluttony. The desire for recognition can lead to pride or vanity.

The problem is thus not merely the existence of desire, but the moral agency involved in its direction, control, and the choices made in response to its urges.

Navigating the Problem: Seeking Good Amidst Temptation

Philosophers and theologians have proposed various pathways to navigate the problem of sin and desire:

Rational Self-Control: As advocated by Plato and Aristotle, cultivating reason and self-discipline to moderate and guide desires towards virtuous ends.
Divine Grace and Transformation: For Augustine and Aquinas, human effort alone is insufficient due to the fallen will. Divine grace is necessary to heal the will and reorient desires towards God.
Virtue Ethics: Developing character traits (virtues) that naturally align one's desires with the good, making virtuous action habitual and pleasurable.
Moral Law and Duty: Later philosophers like Kant emphasized acting out of duty to the moral law, rather than inclination or desire, as the path to true moral worth.

The enduring struggle reflects humanity's continuous quest to reconcile its deepest urges with its highest ideals, to discern good from evil, and to find a path toward flourishing despite the persistent pull of disordered desires.

Conclusion: The Unresolved Tension

The problem of sin and desire remains a central theme in philosophy and theology, an intricate dance between our inherent drives and our moral compass. From the ancient Greek emphasis on rational control to the Abrahamic focus on the will's spiritual condition, the Great Books offer a rich tapestry of thought on this fundamental human predicament. While approaches vary, the consensus points to the necessity of conscious effort – whether through reason, virtue, or faith – to align our powerful desires with the pursuit of the ultimate good, thereby mitigating the pervasive threat of sin and evil. The tension is intrinsic to the human condition, inviting continuous reflection and moral striving.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Theory of the Soul and Desire""