The Enduring Enigma: Confronting the Problem of Good and Evil in Our World

The question of good and evil is perhaps the most ancient and persistent problem humanity faces. Why does suffering exist? Why do individuals and societies commit acts of profound cruelty, even as others strive for benevolence and justice? This pillar page delves into the multifaceted problem of good and evil as explored throughout Western thought, tracing its philosophical and theological roots, examining its manifestations in our world, and contemplating our ongoing struggle to understand and navigate its complexities. It’s a journey not just through intellectual history, but into the very heart of what it means to be human.

The Problem's Persistent Grip: A Universal Inquiry

From the earliest myths to contemporary headlines, the stark contrast between good and evil confronts us daily. We yearn for peace, justice, and kindness, yet are constantly reminded of war, injustice, and malice. This fundamental paradox isn't merely an abstract philosophical puzzle; it's a lived reality that shapes our societies, challenges our faith, and tests our moral resolve. How can we reconcile the existence of suffering and malevolence with the pursuit of a meaningful and virtuous life? This is the core of the problem, a question that has driven thinkers for millennia, from the ancient Greek philosophers to the towering figures of modern philosophy found in the Great Books of the Western World.

Defining the Contours: What Are Good and Evil?

Before we can tackle the "problem," we must first grapple with the definitions themselves. What precisely do we mean by "good" and "evil"? The answers are anything but simple, varying wildly across philosophical schools and religious traditions.

Philosophical Perspectives on Good

The concept of "the Good" has been a central pillar of ethical inquiry.

  • Plato's Ideal Good: In his Republic, Plato posited the Form of the Good as the ultimate reality, the source of all truth, beauty, and knowledge. For Plato, all particular goods participate in this universal, transcendent Good. To live a good life was to align oneself with this ultimate Form through reason and virtue.
  • Aristotle's Eudaimonia: Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, focused on eudaimonia, often translated as "flourishing" or "human well-being." For him, the good life was achieved through the cultivation of virtues (like courage, temperance, justice) as a mean between extremes. Good actions are those that lead to human flourishing.
  • Kantian Deontology: Immanuel Kant, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, argued that moral good stems from duty and universalizable principles. An action is good if it is performed out of respect for the moral law, embodied in his Categorical Imperative ("Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law"). The intention behind an action, rather than its outcome, determines its moral worth.
  • Utilitarianism: Later thinkers, like John Stuart Mill (whose works are in the GBWW), proposed that the good is whatever produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Here, the consequences of actions are paramount.

Understanding Evil: More Than Just Absence?

Defining evil often proves even more challenging than defining good. Is evil an active force, or merely the absence of good?

  • Augustine's Privation Theory: Saint Augustine, a pivotal figure whose Confessions and City of God are essential reading, famously argued that evil is not a substance but rather a privation or absence of good. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the corruption or deficiency of good. This view attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with an omnipotent and benevolent God.

  • Moral Evil vs. Natural Evil:

    • Moral Evil refers to suffering or wrongdoing caused by the deliberate actions or inactions of moral agents (humans). This is where the concept of sin often enters, signifying a willful transgression against divine or moral law. Murder, theft, betrayal – these are examples of moral evil.
    • Natural Evil encompasses suffering caused by natural phenomena, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, diseases, or famines. These events are not attributed to human agency but pose a significant challenge to the notion of a benevolent creator.

  • Radical Evil: While Kant initially defined evil as a corruption of the will, the concept of "radical evil" (though more fully developed by Hannah Arendt in the 20th century, building on Kantian ideas) refers to evil that seems to defy rational explanation, appearing as a profound, incomprehensible destructive force.

Historical Encounters with the Problem in the Western Tradition

The problem of good and evil has been a constant thread woven through the fabric of Western thought, evolving with each epoch.

Ancient Greece: Reason and Harmony

The Greeks sought to understand good and evil through reason and the pursuit of an ordered life.

  • Socrates and Plato: For Socrates, evil stemmed from ignorance; no one knowingly does evil. Plato elaborated on this, suggesting that evil arises when the soul is out of harmony, failing to be guided by reason towards the Good.
  • Aristotle: Emphasized that virtuous living, guided by practical wisdom, was the path to avoiding vice and achieving a good life.

The Abrahamic Traditions: Divine Will and Human Freedom

With the advent of monotheistic religions, the problem of good and evil took on profound theological dimensions, often framed as the Problem of Evil or theodicy (the attempt to justify God's goodness in the face of evil).

  • The Fall and Original Sin: The biblical narrative of Adam and Eve's disobedience in Genesis introduced the concept of sin as a foundational element of human experience, bringing suffering and evil into the world through human choice.
  • Saint Augustine: Building on this, Augustine developed the doctrine of original sin and free will. He argued that God created humans with free will, and it is through the misuse of this freedom that evil (as a privation of good) enters the world. God is not the author of evil; humans are, through their choices. His writings are foundational for understanding the Christian perspective on this problem.
  • Saint Thomas Aquinas: In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas further elaborated on Augustine's views, asserting that evil is a defect in being, not a positive entity. He also explored natural law, suggesting that moral principles are inherent in the rational order of creation, allowing humans to discern good from evil.

The Enlightenment and Beyond: Autonomy and Critique

The Enlightenment brought a shift towards human reason and autonomy, challenging traditional religious explanations.

  • Immanuel Kant: While still believing in a moral law, Kant grounded it in human reason, not divine command. He explored how evil could arise even from a perversion of a good will, leading to actions that violate universal moral principles.
  • Friedrich Nietzsche: A radical critic of traditional morality, Nietzsche, in works like Beyond Good and Evil and Thus Spoke Zarathustra, famously argued for a "revaluation of all values." He contended that traditional concepts of good and evil (especially Christian morality) were products of a "slave morality" designed to suppress the strong. He challenged humanity to create its own values, transcending conventional notions of good and evil.

The Manifestations of Evil in Our World

The abstract philosophical discussions about good and evil find their starkest reality in the concrete experiences of our world.

(Image: A classical oil painting depicting a dramatic scene from Dante's Inferno, perhaps "The Damned in Hell" by Michelangelo or a similar work. It shows tormented figures in various states of suffering and despair, with darker, more chaotic elements contrasted against glimpses of order or divine judgment in the background, symbolizing the profound struggle between chaos and order, sin and redemption.)

Personal Transgressions and the Nature of Sin

At the individual level, the problem of good and evil manifests in every moral choice we make. When we choose to lie, to harm, to betray, we contribute to the sum of evil in the world. The concept of sin, deeply embedded in many religious traditions, highlights this personal responsibility, framing it as a transgression against a divine or moral order. It emphasizes the active role of human will in choosing actions that detract from the good.

Systemic Evil and Collective Responsibility

Beyond individual acts, evil can become institutionalized, woven into the fabric of societies. Slavery, genocide, oppressive regimes, systemic discrimination, and unjust economic systems are examples of systemic evil. Here, the problem becomes one of collective responsibility, where structures and policies perpetuate suffering on a massive scale, often making it difficult to pinpoint individual culpability. This challenges us to look beyond personal sin to the broader societal forces at play.

The Indifference of Nature: Natural Evil Revisited

The existence of natural disasters, diseases, and other forms of suffering not caused by human agency continues to be a profound aspect of the problem of good and evil. For those who believe in a benevolent creator, natural evil presents a significant challenge: why would a good God permit such seemingly indiscriminate suffering? While some theological responses (theodicies) attempt to explain this, the stark reality of natural evil often tests faith and philosophical frameworks alike.

Understanding the problem of good and evil isn't merely an academic exercise; it's a call to action. How do we respond to the presence of evil and strive for good in our lives and in the world?

Moral Responsibility and Agency

Despite the complexities, a recurring theme is the importance of individual moral agency. We are not passive observers; our choices matter. Cultivating virtues, exercising empathy, and making conscious decisions to act with integrity are crucial steps in countering evil. This aligns with the Aristotelian emphasis on character and the Kantian imperative to act according to duty.

The Pursuit of Justice and Compassion

On a societal level, responding to the problem of good and evil involves actively working towards justice. This means challenging systemic evils, advocating for the vulnerable, and building institutions that promote fairness and human dignity. Compassion, the ability to feel and respond to the suffering of others, becomes a powerful force for good, inspiring collective action to alleviate pain and promote well-being.

Conclusion: An Unfinished Dialogue

The problem of good and evil remains one of humanity's most profound and persistent inquiries. There are no easy answers, no single philosophical key that unlocks the entire mystery. From Plato's Forms to Augustine's privation theory, from Kant's categorical imperative to Nietzsche's radical critique, the thinkers of the Great Books of the Western World have offered us invaluable frameworks for understanding this complex issue.

Yet, the dialogue continues. In our modern world, with its technological advancements and ever-present challenges, confronting the problem of good and evil is more vital than ever. It demands our continuous reflection, our ethical engagement, and our unwavering commitment to fostering a world where good can flourish and evil can be diminished.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Problem of Evil Explained - Crash Course Philosophy"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "What is Good? Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill"

Share this post