The Enduring Quest for Justice in Conflict and Harmony

The principle of justice, a cornerstone of ethical and political philosophy, faces its most profound tests in the realms of war and peace. This article explores how philosophers, from antiquity to modernity, have grappled with defining, applying, and upholding justice in the context of human conflict and the pursuit of lasting harmony. Drawing upon the rich tapestry of the Great Books of the Western World, we delve into the conditions that justify war, the ethical conduct within it, and the moral imperatives for establishing a just and enduring peace. Understanding these principles is not merely an academic exercise; it is a fundamental duty for individuals and states alike, shaping our collective future.

Since the dawn of organized society, humanity has wrestled with the paradox of conflict: how can acts of violence, destruction, and profound suffering ever be reconciled with the principle of justice? The question of justice in war and peace is not merely one of legal precedent or political expediency, but a deep philosophical inquiry into the very nature of human morality and the proper ordering of the state. From the battlefields of ancient Greece to the complex geopolitics of today, thinkers have sought to delineate the boundaries of legitimate force and the pathways to equitable resolutions.

The Foundational Principle: What is Justice?

Before we can speak of justice in war, we must first understand justice itself. As explored extensively in Plato's Republic, justice is often conceived as the proper ordering of the soul and the state, where each part performs its function harmoniously. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, further elaborates on justice as a virtue, distinguishing between distributive justice (fair allocation of goods and honors) and corrective justice (rectifying wrongs). For these ancient philosophers, justice was not merely a legalistic concept but an intrinsic aspect of the good life and a well-ordered society. It is this foundational understanding of fairness, equity, and moral rightness that underpins all subsequent discussions of conflict.

From Theory to Battlefield: The Justice of Going to War (Jus Ad Bellum)

The concept of a "just war" is one of the most significant contributions to political philosophy found within the Great Books. Pioneered by figures like St. Augustine in The City of God and formalized by St. Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theologica, jus ad bellum outlines the criteria that must be met for a state to justly initiate armed conflict. This framework is not a glorification of war, but a severe limitation on its use, born from the recognition of war's inherent tragedy.

Table: Core Principles of Jus Ad Bellum

| Principle | Description

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Principle of Justice in War and Peace philosophy"

Share this post