The Principle of Justice in War and Peace: An Enduring Philosophical Inquiry

Summary: The principle of justice stands as a cornerstone of human civilization, its application profoundly tested in the realms of war and peace. From the earliest philosophical inquiries in the Great Books of the Western World, thinkers have grappled with the fundamental duty to act justly, whether in establishing a harmonious society or navigating the moral quagmire of armed conflict. This article explores how philosophers, from Plato and Aristotle to Augustine, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Kant, have sought to define, apply, and uphold justice, revealing its unwavering centrality to human flourishing and the pursuit of a world where peace is not merely the absence of war, but the presence of a just order.

Unpacking the Bedrock: Justice as a Foundational Principle

The human condition is perpetually caught between the aspiration for order and the reality of chaos. At the heart of this tension lies the principle of justice. It is not merely a legal construct, nor solely a moral sentiment, but a fundamental ideal that seeks to regulate human interaction, distribute goods and burdens fairly, and rectify wrongs. For millennia, philosophers have pondered its essence, acknowledging its profound implications for both individual lives and the grand tapestry of nations, particularly in the extreme states of war and peace.

The Great Books of the Western World serve as an invaluable repository of these reflections, tracing the evolution of thought on justice from its nascent forms in ancient Greece to its complex manifestations in the modern era. What emerges is a consistent emphasis on justice as a universal duty, a moral imperative that transcends mere utility or expediency.

The Ancient Foundations of Justice and Duty

The earliest systematic attempts to articulate the principle of justice laid the groundwork for all subsequent thought. These foundational texts from the Great Books reveal a deep concern for the just ordering of the soul, the city, and indeed, the world.

Plato's Ideal State and the Just Soul

In Plato's seminal work, The Republic, justice is not merely an external act but an internal state of the soul. He posits that a just individual is one whose rational, spirited, and appetitive parts are in harmony, with reason guiding the whole. This internal balance mirrors the ideal justice in the state, where each class (rulers, auxiliaries, producers) performs its proper duty, contributing to the collective good. For Plato, justice is the prerequisite for a flourishing society, a principle without which neither individuals nor cities can achieve true peace. The pursuit of justice, therefore, becomes a primary duty of both the citizen and the state.

Aristotle's Virtue Ethics and Distributive Justice

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, offers a more practical and empirical approach to justice. He distinguishes between universal justice (adherence to law and fairness) and particular justice. The latter he further divides into:

  • Distributive Justice: Concerned with the fair allocation of honors, wealth, and other goods according to merit or contribution.
  • Rectificatory Justice: Concerned with setting right transactions between individuals, whether voluntary (contracts) or involuntary (crimes), aiming to restore equality.

For Aristotle, justice is the supreme virtue, encompassing all others, and it is inherently social. The duty of the state is to foster conditions under which its citizens can live justly and virtuously, thereby securing the peace and stability necessary for human flourishing. The principle here is that a just society is one where individuals are given their due, and wrongs are corrected, ensuring a stable foundation for collective life.

Justice in Conflict: Navigating the Morality of War

While the ancients pondered justice primarily in the context of the city-state, the rise of empires and the complexities of inter-state relations forced later thinkers to confront the brutal reality of war. Can justice exist in such a destructive enterprise? The development of Just War Theory, extensively debated within the Great Books, sought to apply the principle of justice to the extreme circumstances of armed conflict.

Augustine and Aquinas: Laying the Groundwork

The Christian tradition, grappling with the tension between pacifism and the need for defense, played a crucial role. St. Augustine of Hippo, in City of God, posited that while war is a tragic consequence of sin, it can be undertaken justly as a duty to restore peace and punish wrongdoing. Centuries later, St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, systematized these ideas, establishing the foundational criteria for what would become Just War Theory. He outlined specific conditions under which war could be considered morally permissible, thereby applying the principle of justice even to the act of violence.

Jus ad Bellum: The Justice of Going to War

This branch of Just War Theory concerns the principle of whether it is just to initiate war. It sets stringent criteria that states must meet before resorting to armed conflict, underscoring the profound duty to avoid unnecessary violence.

Criterion Description
Just Cause War must be waged to correct a grave public evil, such as aggression or massive human rights violations. Self-defense is the clearest example.
Legitimate Authority Only a proper governmental authority, acting on behalf of the people, has the right to declare war. This prevents private individuals or rogue factions from initiating conflict.
Right Intention The primary aim of going to war must be to achieve a just peace and restore order, not for territorial gain, economic exploitation, or revenge.
Last Resort All non-violent alternatives (diplomacy, sanctions, negotiation) must have been exhausted or deemed impractical before resorting to military force. This emphasizes the duty to seek peace first.
Proportionality The anticipated good from going to war must outweigh the expected harm. The scale of the violence must be proportionate to the injury suffered or the aim pursued.
Reasonable Hope of Success There must be a realistic chance of achieving the just aims of the war. Engaging in a futile war is morally irresponsible and causes unnecessary suffering.

Jus in Bello: Justice in Conduct During War

Once war has begun, the principle of justice continues to apply, guiding the conduct of combatants. This emphasizes the duty to minimize harm and uphold human dignity even amidst conflict.

  • Discrimination (Non-combatant Immunity): Military force must be directed only at legitimate military targets and combatants. Non-combatants (civilians, prisoners of war, medical personnel) must be protected from intentional attack.
  • Proportionality: The force used against legitimate military targets must be proportionate to the military advantage gained. Excessive or wanton destruction is prohibited.
  • Necessity: Only the minimum force necessary to achieve a legitimate military objective should be employed.

Jus post Bellum: Justice After Conflict

An emerging but crucial aspect of Just War Theory, jus post bellum addresses the principle of justice in the aftermath of war, focusing on the duty to establish a lasting and equitable peace. This includes considerations of:

  • Punishment of War Crimes: Holding perpetrators accountable.
  • Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Aiding in the rebuilding of societies.
  • Reparations: Addressing legitimate claims for compensation.
  • Demilitarization and Reconciliation: Preventing future conflicts and fostering harmony.

The Social Contract and the Pursuit of Peace

Beyond the direct engagement with war, philosophers in the Great Books also explored how societies are formed and maintained in peace, often through the lens of the social contract. Here, the principle of justice is seen as the very foundation upon which legitimate governance rests, and the duty of the state is to secure the rights and well-being of its citizens.

Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau: From Nature to Society

  • Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan) famously argued that in the "state of nature," life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." To escape this perpetual war of all against all, individuals enter a social contract, surrendering some liberties to an absolute sovereign. For Hobbes, justice is defined by the laws of this sovereign, and the duty of the state is primarily to maintain order and security, thereby ensuring peace.
  • John Locke (Two Treatises of Government) presented a more optimistic view, suggesting that individuals possess inherent natural rights (life, liberty, property) even in the state of nature. The social contract, for Locke, is formed to protect these rights. The principle of justice here is inextricably linked to the protection of individual liberties, and the duty of government is to rule with the consent of the governed, ensuring a just and stable peace.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract) offered a vision where individuals surrender their particular wills to the "general will" of the community. Justice is achieved when laws reflect this general will, promoting equality and freedom. The duty of citizens is to participate in this collective self-governance, thereby creating a truly just and enduring peace.

These thinkers, though differing in their conclusions, collectively underscore the principle that a just society is a prerequisite for lasting peace, and that the establishment of such a society is a fundamental duty.

Kant's Perpetual Peace: A Vision for Global Justice

Immanuel Kant, in his essay Perpetual Peace, extends the concept of justice beyond national borders. He argues that lasting peace among nations is not merely an ideal but a moral imperative achievable through a system of international law based on republican constitutions, a federation of free states, and universal hospitality. For Kant, the moral duty to seek peace is absolute, driven by the principle of reason itself. He envisions a world where justice is not confined to domestic affairs but governs the relations between all peoples, ultimately leading to a global peace founded on moral law.

Modern Dilemmas and Enduring Principles

In our complex contemporary world, the principle of justice in war and peace continues to face unprecedented challenges. The rise of non-state actors, cyber warfare, global terrorism, and humanitarian crises force us to re-evaluate traditional frameworks.

Challenges to Justice in a Complex World

  • Asymmetric Warfare: How do principles of jus in bello apply when one side is a state and the other a diffuse, non-state entity?
  • Humanitarian Intervention: Is it a duty to intervene militarily in sovereign nations to prevent mass atrocities, even without explicit UN Security Council authorization? What are the principles governing such actions?
  • Cyber Warfare: How do we define aggression and proportionality in a domain where attacks can be invisible and their origins ambiguous?
  • Global Inequality: Can true peace exist while vast disparities in justice and opportunity persist across the globe?

Despite these new complexities, the core principles articulated by the philosophers in the Great Books remain remarkably pertinent. The duty to pursue justice—whether in preventing war, conducting it ethically, or building lasting peace—is as urgent as ever.

(Image: A classical marble sculpture depicting Themis, the Greek goddess of justice, blindfolded and holding scales in one hand and a sword in the other, symbolizing impartiality and the power to enforce justice. The background subtly suggests both a battlefield and a serene city, representing the duality of war and peace.)

The Unwavering Duty to Strive for Justice

Ultimately, the journey through the Great Books reveals that justice is not a static concept but a dynamic principle requiring constant re-evaluation and commitment. It is the moral compass that guides humanity towards a more humane existence, reminding us of our collective duty to build societies where fairness prevails, conflicts are resolved peacefully, and the scourge of unjust war is minimized. The pursuit of justice in war and peace is not merely an academic exercise; it is the fundamental endeavor of civilization itself.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Great Books of the Western World Justice Philosophy""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Just War Theory Explained Aquinas Augustine""

Share this post