The Principle of Justice in War and Peace

The pursuit of justice is one of humanity's most enduring and complex duties, a philosophical quest that spans the entirety of recorded thought. This article explores the profound Principle of Justice as it applies to the most extreme of human endeavors – War and Peace – drawing insights from the foundational texts of Western philosophy. From the ancient Greeks to Enlightenment thinkers, the question of what constitutes a just action, a just society, and a just conflict has shaped our understanding of morality, governance, and the very nature of human coexistence. We will navigate the intricate ethical frameworks that attempt to impose order on the chaos of war and establish the conditions for lasting peace, examining the principles that guide our moral compass in these critical domains.


I. Defining Justice: A Foundational Principle

Before delving into the specifics of conflict and harmony, it is essential to grasp the multifaceted nature of Justice itself. It is not merely a legal concept but a core philosophical Principle that underpins ethical conduct, societal structure, and individual duty.

A. Ancient Roots: Plato, Aristotle, and the Cardinal Virtues

The earliest systematic explorations of Justice reveal its profound significance. For Plato, as articulated in The Republic, justice within the individual is a state of harmony where reason, spirit, and appetite each fulfill their proper function, analogous to the ideal state where each class (guardians, auxiliaries, producers) performs its duty. Justice, in this view, is the overarching virtue that ensures order and balance.

Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, offers a more nuanced classification. He distinguishes between distributive justice, which concerns the fair allocation of goods, honors, and opportunities according to merit or need, and rectificatory justice, which aims to correct imbalances arising from transactions or injuries. For Aristotle, the Principle of Justice is about giving each their due, maintaining proportionality, and ensuring fairness in human interactions. It is a cardinal virtue, essential for both individual flourishing and the stability of the polis.

B. Justice as a Moral Imperative and Duty

Beyond individual virtue, Justice emerges as a compelling moral imperative and a collective duty within society. The idea that there are universal standards of right and wrong, often termed natural law, posits that certain principles of Justice are discoverable by reason and are binding on all. This perspective elevates Justice from a desirable quality to a fundamental requirement for legitimate governance and human dignity. It implies a duty not only to act justly but also to create and uphold just institutions.


II. Justice in War: Navigating the Abyss of Conflict

The application of the Principle of Justice to the brutal reality of war presents one of philosophy's greatest challenges. The Just War tradition, deeply rooted in the writings of figures like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas (whose works are compiled in the Great Books), provides a framework for evaluating the morality of armed conflict.

A. Jus ad Bellum: The Justice of Going to War

Jus ad bellum refers to the conditions under which it is morally permissible for a state to resort to war. These criteria embody the Principle that war, while sometimes necessary, must always be a last resort and undertaken for righteous reasons.

| Criterion | Description

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Principle of Justice in War and Peace philosophy"

Share this post