The Principle of Justice in War and Peace and Principle

The Unyielding Principle: Justice in War and Peace

The human condition, throughout history, has been a ceaseless oscillation between the brutal reality of conflict and the fervent aspiration for harmony. Yet, beneath this tumultuous surface lies an enduring philosophical bedrock: the principle of justice. This article posits that justice is not merely an ideal to be pursued in times of tranquility, but a foundational duty that governs the initiation of war, the conduct within it, and the establishment of a lasting peace. From the ancient Greek city-states grappling with inter-polis strife to the modern international order, the quest to define and apply justice in the extreme conditions of war and peace remains one of humanity's most profound and persistent challenges, extensively explored within the Great Books of the Western World.

Defining Justice: A Timeless Pursuit

Before we can apply justice to the realms of war and peace, we must first grapple with its essence. As Plato meticulously explored in his Republic, justice is often conceived as that which ensures order and right relations, whether within the soul, the city, or among nations. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, distinguishes between distributive justice (fair allocation of goods and honors) and corrective justice (rectifying wrongs). At its core, justice implies fairness, equity, and the upholding of rights and responsibilities. It is a universal principle, demanding that reason guide our actions, even – especially – when passions run highest.

Justice Ad Bellum: The Right to Go to War

The question of when it is permissible to resort to armed conflict is perhaps the most morally fraught. The tradition of just war theory, largely developed by thinkers like Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas, provides a framework, asserting that war, while often a terrible necessity, must be undertaken only under specific conditions. This is the principle of jus ad bellum: justice in going to war.

Key criteria for jus ad bellum include:

Just Cause: War must be waged to correct a grave public evil, such as responding to aggression or preventing widespread atrocities. Mere territorial gain or economic advantage is insufficient.
Legitimate Authority: Only a properly constituted public authority (e.g., a state) has the right to declare war. Private individuals or groups lack this authority.
Right Intention: The primary aim of war must be to restore a just peace, not vengeance or conquest.
Last Resort: All peaceful alternatives must have been exhausted before resorting to force.
Proportionality: The good achieved by going to war must outweigh the harm inflicted.
Reasonable Hope of Success: Engaging in a war that has no realistic chance of achieving its just aims is considered irrational and unjust.

These criteria impose a stringent duty on leaders and states, demanding rigorous ethical deliberation before unleashing the destructive forces of war.

Justice In Bello: Right Conduct During War

Once war has begun, the principle of justice does not cease to apply; rather, it shifts its focus to the methods and conduct of combatants. This is jus in bello: justice in war. Even in the chaos of battle, there are moral boundaries and duties that must be upheld, distinguishing between permissible and impermissible acts.

Fundamental principles of jus in bello include:

Discrimination (Non-Combatant Immunity): Military force must be directed only at legitimate military targets. Civilians, medical personnel, and prisoners of war are generally considered non-combatants and must be protected from direct attack. This reflects a profound duty to preserve innocent life.
Proportionality: The harm inflicted on military targets must be proportional to the military advantage gained. Excessive force or collateral damage that far outweighs the objective is unjust.
Necessity: Only the minimum force necessary to achieve a legitimate military objective should be used.
No Malice: Acts of wanton destruction, torture, or cruelty are always prohibited.

The adherence to jus in bello is a testament to the enduring belief that even in humanity's darkest moments, the light of justice must guide our actions, reminding us of our shared humanity.

(Image: A detailed classical engraving depicting allegorical figures of Justice, blindfolded and holding scales, standing between a battlefield scene with soldiers and a peaceful cityscape with people constructing buildings. The scales are balanced, suggesting the equilibrium justice seeks to achieve even amidst chaos.)

Justice Post Bellum: Building a Lasting Peace

The cessation of hostilities does not mark the end of justice's demands. The principle of jus post bellum addresses the ethical considerations for concluding a war and establishing a just and lasting peace. This phase is crucial, as an unjust peace can sow the seeds for future conflict.

Considerations for jus post bellum include:

Just Cause for Termination: Peace must be sought for just reasons, not merely exhaustion or a desire to consolidate unjust gains.
Proportionality and Public Declaration: Peace terms should be proportional to the wrongs suffered and publicly declared to foster transparency and legitimacy.
Discrimination in Punishment: War criminals should be brought to justice, but collective punishment of an entire populace is unjust and counterproductive.
Rehabilitation and Reconstruction: Efforts should be made to rebuild societies, restore infrastructure, and support the political and economic rehabilitation of the defeated party, fostering reconciliation.
Rights and Sovereignty: The rights and sovereignty of all parties, including the defeated, should be respected in the post-conflict settlement, preventing resentment and promoting stability.

The establishment of a truly just peace requires not only the absence of war but also the presence of conditions that allow for human flourishing, including fair governance, equitable resource distribution, and the robust protection of rights – concepts explored by philosophers like John Locke and Immanuel Kant in their visions of social contracts and perpetual peace. It is a continuous duty to cultivate these conditions.

The Interconnectedness of Justice, War, and Peace

The principle of justice is not a series of disconnected rules but a continuous thread weaving through all aspects of human conflict and resolution. It imposes a moral duty on individuals, states, and international bodies to seek righteousness at every stage. From the decision to engage in war, through the conduct of hostilities, to the arduous task of forging peace, justice serves as the indispensable compass, guiding humanity away from pure savagery and towards a more ordered and ethical existence. The Great Books of the Western World consistently remind us that while the pursuit of justice is often arduous and imperfect, it remains the highest aspiration for any civilized society.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Just War Theory Explained Philosophy""