The Principle of Justice in War and Peace: A Philosophical Inquiry

The pursuit of justice stands as one of humanity's most enduring and complex philosophical endeavors, particularly when examined through the lens of conflict and harmony. From the ancient polis to the modern international stage, the Principle of Justice has served as a foundational ethical framework, guiding our understanding of right and wrong, duty and obligation, in both the brutal realities of war and the fragile aspirations of peace. This article delves into the rich tapestry of Western thought, drawing from the Great Books, to explore how philosophers have grappled with this paramount principle, seeking to define, apply, and uphold it across the spectrum of human experience. We will trace the evolution of justice from ancient virtue ethics to modern international law, demonstrating its continuous relevance in navigating the moral complexities of human society.

The Historical Roots of Justice: From Virtue to Law

The concept of justice is as old as philosophy itself, deeply embedded in the foundational texts that shaped Western thought. Philosophers have long debated its nature, its source, and its application.

Ancient Perspectives: Plato and Aristotle

In ancient Greece, the Principle of Justice was often understood primarily as a virtue.

  • Plato, in his seminal work The Republic, conceptualized justice not merely as a set of laws, but as the proper ordering of the soul and, by extension, the state. For Plato, a just individual achieved inner harmony when reason, spirit, and appetite each performed their proper duty. Similarly, a just state was one where each class—rulers, auxiliaries, and producers—fulfilled its specific function, leading to societal balance and flourishing. Injustice, conversely, was a form of internal and external discord.
  • Aristotle, building upon and refining Plato's ideas in Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, distinguished between various forms of justice:
    • Distributive Justice: Concerned with the fair allocation of resources, honors, and burdens according to merit or need.
    • Corrective Justice: Focused on rectifying wrongs, ensuring that those who commit injustices compensate their victims, often through legal means.
    • Reciprocal Justice: Justice in exchanges, ensuring fairness in transactions.
      Aristotle viewed justice as a cardinal virtue, essential for the well-being of the individual and the stability of the polis.

Medieval Formulations: Augustine and Aquinas

The Christian tradition profoundly influenced the concept of justice, integrating divine law and natural law into the philosophical framework.

  • St. Augustine of Hippo, particularly in City of God, explored justice in the context of human sin and divine grace. He famously argued that a true commonwealth could not exist without justice, linking it inextricably to the worship of the true God. His reflections laid some of the groundwork for what would become Just War Theory, acknowledging the tragic necessity of defensive warfare but always grounding it in moral considerations.
  • St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, provided the most comprehensive medieval articulation of justice. He synthesized Aristotelian ethics with Christian theology, defining justice as "a habit whereby a man renders to each one his due by a constant and perpetual will." Aquinas systematized the conditions under which war could be considered morally permissible, establishing the core tenets of Jus ad Bellum (justice in going to war) and Jus in Bello (justice in conduct during war), which remain influential today.

Justice in War: The Just War Tradition

The Just War tradition is perhaps the most direct application of the Principle of Justice to the extreme conditions of armed conflict. It seeks to impose moral and ethical limits on warfare, acknowledging that while war is a terrible evil, it might sometimes be a necessary, albeit tragic, duty to defend against greater evils.

Jus ad Bellum: The Justice of Going to War

This set of criteria determines whether it is morally permissible for a state to initiate a war.

Principle Description
Just Cause War must be waged to correct a grave public evil, such as aggression or massive human rights violations. Self-defense is a primary example.
Legitimate Authority War must be declared by a proper governmental authority, not by private groups or individuals.
Right Intention The purpose of the war must be to achieve justice and peace, not for territorial gain, revenge, or economic exploitation.
Last Resort All non-violent alternatives (diplomacy, sanctions) must have been exhausted or deemed impractical.
Proportionality The overall good expected from going to war must outweigh the harm that will be caused by the war itself.
Reasonable Hope of Success There must be a reasonable chance of achieving the war's just aims; futile wars are unjust.

Jus in Bello: Justice in Conduct During War

Once war has begun, these principles govern the ethical conduct of combatants.

  • Discrimination: Non-combatants (civilians, medical personnel) must not be intentionally targeted. Force should be directed only at legitimate military targets.
  • Proportionality: The force used against legitimate targets must be proportionate to the military objective; excessive or gratuitous violence is prohibited.
  • Necessity: Military actions must be necessary for achieving the objective; wanton destruction is forbidden.

Jus post Bellum: Justice After War

A more recent addition to Just War Theory, Jus post Bellum addresses the ethical obligations of warring parties once hostilities cease. This includes just terms of surrender, reparations, punishment of war criminals, and the restoration of a just peace.

(Image: A classical fresco depicting Plato and Aristotle engaged in dialogue, with Plato pointing upwards towards ideal forms and Aristotle gesturing downwards towards empirical observation, symbolizing their differing approaches to the pursuit of justice and truth, set against the backdrop of an ancient Athenian agora.)

Justice in Peace: Building and Maintaining Order

The Principle of Justice is not only concerned with mitigating the horrors of war but also, and perhaps more fundamentally, with establishing and maintaining a lasting peace. This involves constructing societies and international systems founded on fairness, rights, and mutual respect.

The Social Contract and the State

Enlightenment philosophers explored how states could be legitimate instruments for securing justice.

  • Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan, argued that in a state of nature, life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." To escape this, individuals enter a social contract, surrendering some freedoms to a sovereign power in exchange for order and security, which is a form of justice.
  • John Locke, in Two Treatises of Government, presented a more optimistic view, asserting that individuals possess inherent natural rights (life, liberty, property) even in a state of nature. The government's duty is to protect these rights, and its legitimacy derives from the consent of the governed. A government that fails to uphold this Principle of Justice can be resisted.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, posited that true liberty and justice are found in a society where individuals collectively govern themselves, expressing the "general will" for the common good.

International Law and Perpetual Peace

The vision of a just peace extending beyond national borders has been a persistent theme.

  • Immanuel Kant, in his essay Perpetual Peace, outlined conditions necessary for enduring international harmony. He proposed a federation of free states, each with a republican constitution, bound by cosmopolitan law. For Kant, achieving perpetual peace was not merely an ideal but a moral duty, a rational imperative for humanity to move beyond the state of nature in international relations. This vision continues to inform contemporary international law and organizations like the United Nations, striving to institutionalize the Principle of Justice globally.

The Enduring Duty to Justice

From the harmonious soul of Plato's individual to Kant's vision of a global federation, the Principle of Justice remains a constant lodestar in philosophical inquiry. It is not a static concept but a dynamic ideal, continually reinterpreted and reasserted in response to new challenges. Whether confronting the moral dilemmas of war or striving to build a more equitable peace, humanity's duty to pursue justice is unending. It calls upon us to evaluate our actions, challenge injustices, and tirelessly work towards a world where fairness and dignity prevail for all. The Great Books remind us that this pursuit is the very essence of what it means to be human and to live ethically in a complex world.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Just War Theory explained philosophy"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Kant Perpetual Peace summary"

Share this post