The Politics of War and Peace and Politics

The Perennial Dance: Unpacking the Politics of War and Peace

The human story, from its earliest chronicles to the present day, is an intricate tapestry woven with threads of both brutal conflict and profound serenity. At its heart lies the inescapable realm of Politics, the arena where the collective will of humanity, often mediated by the Government and embodied by the State, constantly navigates the treacherous waters of War and Peace. This article delves into the profound philosophical underpinnings of this enduring dichotomy, examining how political structures and human nature perpetually shape our propensity for devastating violence and our persistent yearning for lasting tranquility, drawing deeply from the timeless insights enshrined within the Great Books of the Western World.

The Enduring Conundrum: Politics as the Crucible of Conflict and Concord

To speak of War and Peace is, inherently, to speak of Politics. From the city-states of ancient Greece to the globalized nations of today, the decisions that lead to armed conflict or foster stable accord are invariably political. It is within the political sphere that power is contested, resources are allocated, and ideologies clash or converge. The very definition of the State, as articulated by thinkers like Max Weber, involves a monopoly on legitimate violence, a power that can be wielded for defense, aggression, or the maintenance of internal order. This fundamental capacity for organized force places the Government at the epicenter of the War and Peace spectrum.

The State's Dual Mandate: Security and Sovereignty

The primary function of any State, as explored by numerous philosophers from Thucydides to Hobbes, is the preservation of its own existence and the security of its citizens. This imperative often dictates a pragmatic, sometimes ruthless, approach to foreign relations.

Security: The need to protect borders, resources, and cultural identity.
Sovereignty: The assertion of independent authority within defined territories, often leading to friction with other sovereign entities.

This dual mandate frequently sets the stage for conflict, as states perceive threats or opportunities that necessitate the use of force, or at least the credible threat of it.

Philosophical Genealogies of War: From Justice to Realism

The Great Books of the Western World offer a rich, albeit often unsettling, exploration of why humanity wages war. Philosophers have grappled with the morality, necessity, and inevitability of conflict for millennia.

Plato's Republic and the Pursuit of Justice: While Plato envisions an ideal State where reason governs and justice prevails, he acknowledges the need for a warrior class (Guardians) to protect the city. For Plato, war, if necessary, should serve the higher aim of justice and order, not mere conquest.
Thucydides' Peloponnesian War and the Melian Dialogue: Thucydides provides a starkly realistic account, demonstrating how fear, honor, and interest drive states to war, often irrespective of moral claims. His famous Melian Dialogue encapsulates the brutal logic of power politics: "The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." This perspective profoundly influenced later realists.
Augustine's Just War Theory: In The City of God, Augustine laid foundational principles for what would become the "Just War" tradition. He argued that war could be morally permissible under specific conditions:
- Jus ad bellum (justice in going to war): Just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, last resort, reasonable hope of success, proportionality.
- Jus in bello (justice in conduct of war): Discrimination (non-combatant immunity), proportionality.
Machiavelli's The Prince and the Art of Power: Machiavelli famously detached politics from traditional morality, arguing that a prince must be prepared to act immorally if necessary to maintain the State and secure its interests. War, for Machiavelli, is a tool of statecraft, a necessary evil to ensure survival and strength.
Hobbes' Leviathan and the State of Nature: Thomas Hobbes posited that without a strong sovereign Government, humanity would exist in a "state of nature," a "war of all against all." The State is thus a necessary construct to escape this chaotic existence, offering security in exchange for individual liberties. War, in this view, is the default condition without effective governance.

The Elusive Promise of Peace: Ideals and Institutions

Despite the recurring cycles of conflict, the yearning for Peace remains a powerful human aspiration. Philosophers have also dedicated considerable thought to how lasting peace might be achieved and sustained.

Aristotle's Politics and Civic Harmony: Aristotle believed that the purpose of the State was to enable its citizens to live a good life (eudaimonia). A well-ordered Government fosters civic harmony and stability, reducing internal strife and promoting a just society, which he saw as foundational for peace.
Kant's Perpetual Peace: Immanuel Kant, in his essay "Perpetual Peace," outlined a vision for a world free from war. He proposed that peace could be achieved through a federation of republican states, bound by international law, where citizens' consent is required for war. Key elements included:
- Republican constitutions within states.
- A federation of free states (not a world State).
- Universal hospitality.
  Kant's ideas remain a cornerstone of liberal international relations theory, emphasizing the role of law and international institutions in managing politics and preventing war.
The Enlightenment's Optimism: Thinkers like John Locke, whose Two Treatises of Government influenced modern democratic thought, argued for a more optimistic view of human nature and the possibility of rational cooperation between states, guided by natural law and mutual respect.

(Image: A detailed classical oil painting depicting a grand allegorical scene. In the foreground, a stern, armored figure representing Mars or War, with a drawn sword and a menacing expression, is being restrained or pleaded with by a serene, robed female figure representing Pax or Peace, who holds an olive branch. In the background, a burning city or a battlefield contrasts with a distant, tranquil landscape bathed in soft light, symbolizing the choice between destruction and harmony. The overall composition is dynamic, highlighting the eternal struggle between these two forces.)

The Interplay of Politics and Human Nature: An Unfinished Symphony

The Politics of War and Peace is not merely an abstract philosophical debate; it is a lived reality shaped by the complex interplay of human nature, institutional structures, and historical contingencies. The Government, as the institutionalization of the State's power, wields immense influence over whether a society leans towards conflict or cooperation. Yet, the choices made by political leaders are often reflections of deeper societal values, fears, and ambitions.

The ongoing challenge is to construct political systems and international frameworks that can channel aggressive impulses, resolve disputes peacefully, and foster a genuine commitment to peace, not merely as the absence of war, but as the presence of justice and flourishing. This requires a constant engagement with the profound questions posed by the Great Books, reminding us that the pursuit of War and Peace is an eternal dance, where the music is composed by the ever-evolving Politics of human existence.

Further Philosophical Exploration:

📹 Related Video: PLATO ON: The Allegory of the Cave

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Hobbes Leviathan state of nature explained""

📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?