The Politics of War and Peace and Politics

The Enduring Dialectic: The Politics of War and Peace

The perennial dance between conflict and concord, between war and peace, lies at the very heart of human politics. It is a fundamental inquiry that has occupied the greatest minds throughout history, shaping our understanding of government, the purpose of the State, and the very fabric of society. This article delves into the philosophical underpinnings of this critical dynamic, drawing upon the rich tapestry of ideas found within the Great Books of the Western World to illuminate how political thought has grappled with the profound implications of armed conflict and the elusive pursuit of lasting tranquility.

The Ancient Genesis: Order, Justice, and External Threats

From the earliest philosophical inquiries, the relationship between internal political order and external relations has been paramount. The ancient Greeks, living amidst fiercely independent city-states often at odds with one another, provided foundational insights.

Plato's Republic: In his vision of the ideal State, Plato grapples with the necessity of a guardian class, trained not only to defend the polis but also to understand the just application of force. For Plato, internal justice is a prerequisite for a well-ordered state, but he implicitly acknowledges the external pressures that necessitate military preparedness. The philosopher-king, with his understanding of the Good, would ideally guide decisions of war and peace, ensuring they serve the highest ethical ends of the community.
Aristotle's Politics: Aristotle, ever the pragmatist, examines various forms of government and their inherent tendencies towards conflict or stability. He discusses the nature of citizenship, the purpose of the State as providing for the good life, and the practicalities of defense. While he advocates for a balanced constitution to prevent internal strife, he also recognizes the reality of inter-state competition and the need for a state to be self-sufficient and capable of defending its interests.
Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War: While not a philosopher in the traditional sense, Thucydides' meticulous account offers an unparalleled empirical study of politics, power, and the causes of war. His analysis, particularly the Melian Dialogue, reveals the brutal logic of power politics and the tragic inevitability of conflict when one State perceives a threat from another, regardless of moral arguments. The concepts of fear, honor, and interest emerge as primary drivers, demonstrating that even in ancient times, the rational calculus of power often overshadowed ethical considerations in matters of war and peace.

(Image: A detailed depiction of Plato's Republic, specifically the ideal city-state, with citizens engaged in various roles, overseen by philosopher-kings, juxtaposed with distant, fortified walls hinting at external threats, illustrating the internal order and external challenges inherent in statecraft.)

The Sovereign State and the Brutal Calculus of Power

The transition from the ancient polis to the modern nation-state brought with it new philosophical challenges regarding the locus of power and the justification for both internal coercion and external aggression.

Machiavelli and the Art of Statecraft

Niccolò Machiavelli, in The Prince, famously divorces politics from traditional morality, arguing that a ruler must often act immorally to preserve the State and ensure its survival. For Machiavelli, the primary concern of the government is to maintain power, and the decision for war or peace is purely a strategic one, based on what best serves the interests of the prince and the State. His work marks a stark shift, presenting a pragmatic, often ruthless, approach to statecraft where virtue is less about goodness and more about efficacy in wielding power.

Hobbes and the Leviathan

Thomas Hobbes, writing in the tumultuous aftermath of the English Civil War, presented a powerful argument for the necessity of a strong, sovereign State in Leviathan. His philosophy posits a "state of nature" as a "war of all against all," where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." To escape this horrifying condition, individuals enter into a social contract, surrendering some of their freedoms to an absolute sovereign (the Government) in exchange for security and order. For Hobbes, the sovereign's power is indivisible and absolute, the ultimate guarantor against both internal chaos and external threats. The sovereign's decision regarding war and peace is thus a critical function to preserve the lives of its citizens.

Table: Contrasting Views on State Power and Conflict

Philosopher	Key Concept / Work	View on State Power	View on War & Peace
Plato	The Republic	Ideal rule by philosopher-kings; just state	War for defense or just cause; internal harmony paramount
Thucydides	History of the Peloponnesian War	Power politics and self-interest	Inevitable outcome of fear, honor, and interest; tragic
Machiavelli	The Prince	Pragmatic, often ruthless, to preserve State	Strategic decision based on utility and power maintenance
Hobbes	Leviathan	Absolute sovereign essential for order	Escape from "state of nature"; sovereign's prerogative

Enlightenment Ideals and the Pursuit of Perpetual Peace

The Enlightenment era brought a renewed focus on reason, individual rights, and the potential for international cooperation to mitigate conflict.

John Locke's Two Treatises of Government: Locke challenged Hobbes's view of absolute sovereignty, arguing for a government based on consent and the protection of natural rights (life, liberty, and property). While he acknowledged the need for defense, his emphasis on limited government and the rule of law suggested a more restrained approach to war. For Locke, aggression was only justifiable in defense of rights or to punish transgressors against natural law.
Immanuel Kant's Perpetual Peace: Perhaps the most optimistic and influential philosophical treatise on international relations, Kant's essay outlines conditions for achieving lasting global peace. He proposes a federation of free republics, bound by international law, where universal hospitality and a commitment to rational principles would gradually diminish the likelihood of war. Kant believed that the spread of republican governments (characterized by citizen participation and checks on power) would inherently lead to more peaceful foreign politics, as citizens would be less inclined to bear the costs of war initiated by despots. This vision highlights the profound connection between a State's internal political structure and its external conduct.

The Modern Predicament: Ideology, Globalism, and the Enduring Struggle

In the centuries following Kant, the politics of war and peace have continued to evolve, shaped by industrialization, nationalism, ideological conflicts, and global interconnectedness. Thinkers like G.W.F. Hegel, in his Philosophy of Right, viewed war as a tragic but sometimes necessary mechanism for the State to assert its identity and for historical progress, a notion that has been both celebrated and condemned.

Today, the challenges are complex:

The rise of non-state actors and asymmetric warfare.
The proliferation of advanced weaponry.
The intricate web of economic interdependence that makes large-scale conflict potentially devastating for all.
The tension between national sovereignty and international humanitarian intervention.

Yet, the core questions remain: How should a government balance national interest with global responsibility? What constitutes a just war? And how can the State best secure peace for its citizens and the wider world? These are not merely practical questions but deeply philosophical ones, requiring constant re-engagement with the foundational ideas of politics, power, and human nature.

Conclusion: The Unfinished Symphony of Politics

The politics of war and peace is an unfinished symphony, a perpetual human endeavor to navigate the treacherous currents of power, interest, and morality. From the ancient polis to the modern global stage, the State and its government remain the primary actors in this drama. The Great Books of the Western World offer not definitive answers, but rather a profound framework for understanding the complexities, the tragedies, and the enduring hope for a more peaceful future. It is through continuous philosophical reflection, informed by history and guided by reason, that we can aspire to move closer to Kant's vision of perpetual peace, recognizing that the struggle for peace is, at its core, a struggle for better politics.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Hobbes Leviathan explained"