The Politics of War and Peace and Politics

The Enduring Calculus: Politics, War, and Peace in Western Thought

Summary: The intricate relationship between Politics, War and Peace has captivated the greatest minds throughout history, revealing profound insights into human nature, the purpose of Government, and the very essence of the State. From ancient Athens to Enlightenment Europe, philosophers within the Great Books of the Western World have grappled with the origins of conflict, the conditions for lasting peace, and the moral and practical obligations of those who wield power. This article explores how these foundational texts illuminate the perpetual struggle to manage human affairs, seeking order amidst chaos, and justice in the face of inevitable strife.

The Foundations of Conflict and Order: Ancient Perspectives

The earliest philosophical inquiries into War and Peace invariably connect these phenomena to the structure and functioning of the Government and the State. The very existence of a political community, a polis, brought with it both the promise of internal peace and the specter of external conflict.

Plato: Justice, the Ideal State, and the Necessity of Guardians

In Plato's Republic, the pursuit of justice within the ideal State is paramount, yet even this harmonious vision acknowledges the need for a warrior class—the Guardians—to protect the city from both internal disorder and external aggression. Politics, for Plato, is the art of ordering the soul and the city, ensuring that reason governs, and that each part performs its function. While the ideal state strives for internal peace through justice, it cannot ignore the realities of a world where other states might not be so perfectly ordered, thus necessitating defense.

Aristotle: The Polis, Citizenship, and the Ends of War

Aristotle, in his Politics, examines the nature of the State as a natural human association aimed at the "good life." He delves into different forms of Government and their impact on civic life. Aristotle considers War and Peace not as isolated events but as integral to the political life of the polis. He articulates early ideas of "just war," suggesting that war should only be waged for the sake of peace or in self-defense, and never as an end in itself. The ultimate goal of the State and its Politics is the well-being and flourishing of its citizens, which includes securing peace.

Thucydides: Power, Fear, and the Melian Dialogue

Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, while a historical account, offers profound philosophical insights into the Politics of conflict. His stark realism, particularly in the "Melian Dialogue," illustrates the brutal logic of power: "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." Here, the pursuit of self-interest by the State often overrides moral considerations, demonstrating how fear, honor, and interest are the primary drivers of War and Peace, irrespective of any ideal Government structure.

Sovereignty, Morality, and the State: Medieval and Early Modern Views

As political thought evolved, so too did the understanding of the State's role in orchestrating War and Peace, often intertwined with questions of morality, divine law, and the nascent concept of sovereignty.

Augustine of Hippo: The Two Cities and Just War Theory

In City of God, Augustine grapples with the problem of evil and the nature of earthly peace. He introduces the concept of bellum iustum (just war), arguing that war, while a tragic consequence of humanity's fallen state, can be permissible under strict conditions: waged by a legitimate authority, for a just cause (e.g., to restore peace or punish wrongdoing), and with right intention. For Augustine, true peace is found only in the Heavenly City, but the Government of the earthly State has a duty to strive for a semblance of peace through the responsible application of Politics, even if it means resorting to war.

(Image: A detailed depiction of a classical philosopher, perhaps Augustine or Machiavelli, seated at a heavy wooden desk, illuminated by candlelight, intensely studying a scroll or an open book, with a map of a besieged city faintly visible in the background, symbolizing the intellectual struggle with the realities of political conflict and the search for order.)

Niccolò Machiavelli: Virtù, Necessity, and the Preservation of the State

Machiavelli's The Prince radically shifts the discourse on Politics, detaching it from traditional morality. He argues that a ruler must often act immorally – employing cunning, deception, and even cruelty – to maintain the State and ensure its survival. For Machiavelli, War and Peace are instruments of statecraft; a prince must always be prepared for war, as it is through military strength that a Government secures its power and protects its interests. The ultimate goal is the preservation and expansion of the State, and virtù (a blend of skill, courage, and determination) is essential in navigating the treacherous waters of power Politics.

Thomas Hobbes: The State of Nature and the Leviathan

In Leviathan, Hobbes presents a bleak vision of humanity's "state of nature" as a "war of all against all." To escape this perpetual conflict, individuals enter into a social contract, surrendering their absolute freedom to an absolute sovereign – the Leviathan. This powerful Government, or State, is the sole guarantor of peace. Hobbes's Politics dictates that the sovereign's power must be indivisible and unquestionable, for any division or challenge would plunge society back into the chaos of war. Peace, therefore, is the direct result of an all-encompassing, unchallenged State authority.

Rights, Reason, and Perpetual Peace: Enlightenment and Beyond

The Enlightenment brought new ideas of individual rights, reason, and international law into the debate, transforming the philosophical understanding of War and Peace and the role of Government.

John Locke: Natural Rights, Limited Government, and the Right to Revolution

Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, posits that individuals possess inherent natural rights (life, liberty, property) even in the state of nature. The Government is formed by consent to protect these rights, with power limited by the law. While Locke acknowledges the need for a State to defend itself, his Politics emphasize a more constrained role for war, primarily for defense or to uphold justice against aggressors. Crucially, he argues that citizens have a right to resist or overthrow a tyrannical Government that breaches the social contract, implying that unjust Politics can lead to internal strife and even justifiable revolution.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The General Will and Collective Peace

Rousseau, in The Social Contract, argues that true freedom and peace are found when individuals unite under a "general will," forming a sovereign State that acts for the common good. While he does not extensively detail international Politics, his vision of a self-governing people implies that a Government truly reflecting the general will would be less prone to unjust wars, as the collective interest would favor peace and mutual respect among similar republics. War and Peace become expressions of a people's collective determination.

Immanuel Kant: Republicanism, International Federation, and Perpetual Peace

Kant's essay Perpetual Peace is perhaps the most direct philosophical engagement with the conditions for lasting global peace. He proposes a plan based on three definitive articles:

Republican Constitutions: Every State should have a republican (representative) Government, as citizens, bearing the costs of war, would be less inclined to declare it.
Federation of Free States: An international federation (not a world State) of free states, upholding international law, would prevent wars.
Universal Hospitality: Mutual respect and the right of visitation among nations.
Kant's Politics is driven by a moral imperative, arguing that reason can guide humanity towards a perpetual peace, transcending the cycle of War and Peace that has historically plagued the State.

Conclusion: The Unfinished Symphony of Statecraft

The philosophical journey through the Great Books of the Western World reveals that the Politics of War and Peace is not a static problem but an evolving challenge, deeply intertwined with the nature of the Government and the very definition of the State. From the ancient realpolitik of Thucydides to Kant's optimistic vision of perpetual peace, thinkers have offered diverse, often conflicting, prescriptions for navigating the human condition. While the ideal of lasting peace remains elusive, these foundational texts continue to provide the intellectual framework for understanding, critiquing, and shaping the political forces that determine whether humanity descends into conflict or ascends towards harmony. The perpetual tension between power and justice, self-interest and universal morality, remains the central dilemma for any Government seeking to secure its citizens' well-being in a world forever teetering between War and Peace.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

📹 Related Video: PLATO ON: The Allegory of the Cave

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato Aristotle Political Philosophy War Peace""
2. ## 📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?