The Politics of War and Peace and Politics

The Enduring Conundrum: The Politics of War and Peace

The relationship between Politics, War and Peace is perhaps the most ancient and persistent philosophical quandary, a crucible in which the very nature of humanity and the State is forged. From the battlefields of ancient Greece to the complex machinations of modern diplomacy, the decision to wage war or secure peace remains fundamentally a political act, driven by the Government and shaped by underlying philosophical tenets. This article delves into the profound insights offered by the Great Books of the Western World, tracing the intellectual lineage that grapples with conflict, cooperation, and the enduring quest for a just and stable order. We explore how thinkers have understood the origins of hostility, the mechanisms for its mitigation, and the ultimate purpose of the State in navigating this perilous terrain.

The Genesis of Conflict: Human Nature and the State

The question of why humans engage in conflict, and how the State attempts to manage or instigate it, has preoccupied philosophers for millennia. Is war an inevitable outcome of human nature, or a consequence of flawed political structures?

From Ancient Greece to the Leviathan:
- Thucydides, in his History of the Peloponnesian War, offers a stark, empirical account, suggesting that "fear, honour, and interest" are the primary drivers of interstate conflict. His work, a cornerstone of political realism, posits that human nature, with its inherent desires and anxieties, remains a constant, shaping the Politics of power regardless of the era. The Athenian Melians dialogue, in particular, encapsulates the brutal logic of power where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.
- Plato, in The Republic, sought to design an ideal State where justice and reason would ideally preclude internal strife and external aggression. Yet, even in his vision, he acknowledges the necessity of a guardian class, trained for both defense and offense, hinting at the ever-present potential for conflict.
- Aristotle, in Politics, examined the causes of faction and revolution within cities, which often lead to war. He argued that the best form of Government aims for the common good, thereby minimizing internal discord that could spill over into external conflicts. However, he also recognized the practicalities of defense and the need for military prowess.
- Perhaps no thinker articulated the inherent conflict in the absence of a strong State more vividly than Thomas Hobbes. In Leviathan, he famously described the "state of nature" as a "war of all against all" (bellum omnium contra omnes), where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." For Hobbes, the only escape from this perpetual conflict is the formation of a powerful sovereign Government – the Leviathan – to enforce laws and maintain War and Peace through absolute authority. The social contract, in this view, is a pragmatic exchange of individual liberty for collective security.

The Instruments of Power: Government, State, and Sovereignty

The Government, acting as the executive arm of the State, wields immense power in determining the course of War and Peace. This power is often framed within the concept of sovereignty, allowing the State to act independently in its own perceived interest.

Machiavelli's Pragmatism and the Realpolitik Tradition:
- Niccolò Machiavelli, in The Prince, offered a chillingly pragmatic view of Politics, advising rulers on how to acquire and maintain power, often through means considered immoral by conventional standards. For Machiavelli, war is an inevitable and often necessary instrument of statecraft. A prince must "have no other aim or thought, nor take up any other thing for his study, but war and its organization and discipline." The survival and expansion of the State are the ultimate goals, and the Government must be prepared to employ any means, including deception and violence, to achieve them. His insights laid the groundwork for what would become known as Realpolitik, where national interest and power trump moral considerations.
- The concept of sovereignty, later elaborated by thinkers like Jean Bodin, solidified the idea of the State as the supreme authority within its borders, capable of making ultimate decisions regarding War and Peace without external interference. This principle, while crucial for internal order, also sets the stage for potential international anarchy when multiple sovereign States pursue conflicting interests.

Generated Image

The Pursuit of Peace: Idealism, Law, and Perpetual Harmony

While some philosophers focused on the inevitability of conflict, others envisioned paths towards lasting War and Peace, often through the establishment of just Government and international cooperation.

From Utopian Visions to International Law:
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau, despite his advocacy for the "general will" within a State, also recognized the inherent dangers of international relations. While he believed a well-ordered State could achieve internal peace, he was skeptical about the prospects for universal peace among States, viewing them as perpetually in a state of nature relative to one another.
- It was Immanuel Kant who perhaps offered the most systematic philosophical blueprint for achieving Perpetual Peace. In his essay of the same name, Kant proposed a set of preliminary and definitive articles for peace, advocating for republican constitutions (where citizens bear the cost of war), a federation of free States (not a global State), and universal hospitality. For Kant, moral law and reason, rather than mere power Politics, should guide international relations, leading towards a cosmopolitan order where rights are respected across borders.
- The tension between the Machiavellian pursuit of national interest and the Kantian ideal of universal peace continues to define international Politics, with various forms of international law and institutions attempting to bridge this divide.

The Calculus of Conflict: War as a Political Instrument

Understanding War and Peace requires more than just analyzing its causes; it demands an examination of its nature and purpose as a tool of Politics.

Clausewitz and the Continuation of Politics:
- Carl von Clausewitz, in his monumental work On War, famously asserted that "war is merely the continuation of Politics by other means." This profound insight reframes war not as an isolated act of violence, but as an integral part of the political process, a rational instrument employed by the State to achieve its objectives when other means fail. He identified a "remarkable trinity" of war: primordial violence (passion), chance and probability, and war as an instrument of policy (reason).
- For Clausewitz, the aims of war are always political, and the military means must always be subordinate to political ends. The Government dictates the goals, and the military executes the strategy. This perspective underscores that even in the chaos of battle, the underlying Politics of the State remains the guiding force, shaping decisions regarding engagement, escalation, and ultimately, the terms of Peace.

The Philosopher's Dilemma: Navigating the Abyss

The philosophical journey through the Politics of War and Peace reveals a persistent tension: the inherent human capacity for both brutal conflict and profound cooperation. From the stark realism of Thucydides and Machiavelli, who saw war as an inevitable and often necessary aspect of statecraft, to the idealistic visions of Kant, who dared to imagine a world of perpetual peace, the Great Books offer a kaleidoscope of perspectives.

The Government, as the embodiment of the State's will, stands at the nexus of these forces, constantly weighing national interest against universal morality, security against liberty. The keywords—Politics, War and Peace, Government, State—are not merely terms but interwoven concepts that define the human condition in the collective sphere. The challenge remains for each generation to critically examine these foundational ideas, to learn from the wisdom and follies of the past, and to strive for a future where the pursuit of Peace might, at last, truly transcend the Politics of conflict.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

📹 Related Video: ARISTOTLE ON: The Nicomachean Ethics

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Great Books of the Western World Thomas Hobbes Leviathan Explained""
2. ## 📹 Related Video: KANT ON: What is Enlightenment?