The Politics of War and Peace and Politics

The Enduring Dialectic: Unpacking the Politics of War and Peace

The perennial dance between conflict and concord, the oscillations of war and peace, are not merely historical events but profound philosophical problems, deeply embedded in the very fabric of human politics. From the ancient city-states to the sprawling empires and modern nation-states, the question of why societies descend into conflict or strive for lasting tranquility has occupied the greatest minds. This article delves into the philosophical underpinnings of war and peace, examining how the nature of government and the State itself are inextricably linked to these ultimate human conditions, drawing insights from the venerable texts of the Great Books of the Western World.

The State, Power, and the Pursuit of Order

At the core of understanding war and peace lies the concept of the State. What is its purpose? What justifies its existence? Philosophers have long grappled with these questions, often concluding that the State emerges, in part, as a bulwark against chaos, a mechanism to establish order and, ideally, peace within its borders. Yet, this very entity, endowed with the monopoly on legitimate force, is also the primary actor in initiating war.

Foundations in Ancient Thought: From Polis to Empire

The seeds of this inquiry are found in ancient Greece. Plato, in his Republic, envisions an ideal State where justice reigns, suggesting that a well-ordered government could minimize internal strife and external aggression. However, even in his philosophical utopia, the need for guardians capable of defense hints at the ever-present threat of war. Aristotle, in his Politics, analyzes various forms of government and their potential for stability or unrest, recognizing that the politics of a State directly influence its propensity for peace or war.

Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, though not strictly philosophy, offers a stark, empirical account of interstate politics, demonstrating how fear, honor, and interest drive nations to conflict. It reveals the brutal realities of power politics, where the pursuit of security often leads to war, regardless of moral justifications.

The Modern State and the Calculus of Conflict

As we move into the modern era, the philosophical lens on war and peace sharpens, often focusing on the nature of sovereignty and the State's power.

Machiavelli's Pragmatism: Niccolò Machiavelli, in The Prince, famously divorces politics from morality, arguing that a ruler must understand the necessities of power. For Machiavelli, war is a tool of statecraft, a legitimate and sometimes essential means for a prince to maintain his State and secure its interests. The pursuit of peace is secondary to the survival and strength of the government.
Hobbes' Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes, profoundly influenced by the English Civil War, posits in Leviathan that life without a strong State is a "war of all against all." For Hobbes, the primary purpose of government is to escape this brutal natural state by establishing a sovereign power capable of enforcing laws and ensuring internal peace. Yet, this internal peace often comes at the cost of potential external war, as sovereign states exist in a similar state of nature relative to each other.
Clausewitz's Enduring Insight: Carl von Clausewitz, in On War, provides a seminal analysis, famously stating that "War is merely the continuation of politics by other means." This profound observation underscores that war is not an aberration but an instrument, albeit a violent one, of government policy. It is a decision made within the realm of politics, a tool employed when diplomatic and other means fail to achieve a State's objectives.

Key Philosophical Perspectives on War and Peace

| Philosopher/Work | Core Idea Regarding War and Peace The politics of war and peace are, in essence, the fundamental considerations of the State and its government concerning survival, dominance, or the pursuit of universal harmony. This complex interplay, explored across the Great Books of the Western World, reveals that the decision to wage war or strive for peace is rarely simple, often driven by a mix of philosophical ideals, pragmatic necessities, and the inherent nature of human power dynamics.

The Philosophical Roots of Conflict and Concord

The journey to understand war and peace begins with profound questions about human nature and the purpose of organized society. Is humanity inherently aggressive, making war an inevitable consequence of self-interest, or are we capable of reason and cooperation, making peace an achievable ideal?

The State as Protector and Aggressor

Historically, the establishment of the State was seen as a means to escape the "state of nature" – a condition often characterized by perpetual conflict. Thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, in his Leviathan, argued that a powerful sovereign government is necessary to prevent a "war of all against all," thus securing internal peace. However, this very power, designed to protect, simultaneously grants the State the capacity to engage in external warfare. This dual nature of the State – both guardian of peace and architect of war – forms a central paradox in political philosophy.

From Ancient Greece to Enlightenment Ideals

Plato's Republic: Envisioned an ideal State where justice and reason would guide its rulers, theoretically minimizing the need for internal conflict and external aggression. Yet, even here, the necessity of a warrior class (Guardians) underscores the persistent threat of war.
Aristotle's Politics: Examined the various forms of government and their potential for fostering civic peace or provoking strife. He saw the polis as the natural home for humans, where virtue and political life could flourish, ideally leading to peace.
Machiavelli's The Prince: Offered a starkly realist perspective, where the politics of power often necessitate war for the State's survival and expansion. For Machiavelli, a ruler must be prepared to act decisively, even ruthlessly, to secure his government's interests, with peace being a temporary condition, not an ultimate goal.
Kant's Perpetual Peace: Immanuel Kant, a proponent of Enlightenment thought, presented a radical vision for lasting peace. In his essay, he outlined conditions for "perpetual peace" among states, including republican governments, a federation of free states, and universal hospitality. Kant believed that reason could guide humanity towards a world free from war, transforming international politics.

(Image: An allegorical painting depicting the contrasting figures of Mars, the Roman god of war, clad in armor and holding a spear, and Pax, the Roman goddess of peace, holding an olive branch and a cornucopia. They stand on a battlefield, with Mars looking aggressive and Pax looking serene, symbolizing the eternal struggle and choice between conflict and harmony in human affairs.)

The Mechanisms of War and the Architecture of Peace

The decision to go to war or pursue peace is a complex one, involving intricate calculations of national interest, moral justification, and strategic advantage. The politics of these decisions often involve a delicate balance of power, diplomacy, and the threat or use of force.

The Just War Tradition

Philosophers and theologians, from Augustine to Aquinas, developed the "Just War" theory, attempting to establish ethical criteria for when war can be considered morally permissible. These criteria typically include:

Jus ad bellum (Justice in going to war):
- Just Cause: Self-defense or to prevent grave injustice.
- Legitimate Authority: Declared by a proper government or State.
- Right Intention: To restore peace, not for conquest.
- Last Resort: All peaceful alternatives exhausted.
- Proportionality: The good achieved outweighs the harm caused.
- Reasonable Hope of Success: Avoid futile conflict.
Jus in bello (Justice in conducting war):
- Discrimination: Non-combatants must be protected.
- Proportionality: Force used must be proportionate to the military objective.

This philosophical framework attempts to impose moral limits on the brutal reality of war, acknowledging its inevitability in certain circumstances while striving to minimize its ethical transgressions.

Building Sustainable Peace

Conversely, the pursuit of peace involves more than just the absence of war. It requires the construction of durable institutions, the fostering of mutual understanding, and the commitment to international law.

Key Elements for Lasting Peace:

Effective Governance: Stable and just governments within states are crucial for internal peace and reduce the likelihood of external conflict stemming from internal instability.
International Law and Institutions: Organizations and treaties that establish norms, mediate disputes, and enforce collective security, as envisioned by Kant, contribute significantly to global peace.
Economic Interdependence: Mutual economic ties can create disincentives for war, as conflict would harm all parties involved.
Diplomacy and Negotiation: The art of politics in resolving disputes without resorting to violence.

Conclusion: The Unending Challenge

The politics of war and peace remains one of humanity's most profound and persistent challenges. From the ancient philosophies that grappled with the nature of the State to the Enlightenment visions of perpetual peace, the Great Books of the Western World provide a rich tapestry of thought on this critical subject. The fundamental tension between the State's capacity for violence and its aspiration for order, the pragmatic necessities of power politics versus the moral imperative for peace, continues to define the human condition. Understanding this intricate dialectic is not merely an academic exercise, but an essential step towards navigating the complex realities of our world and striving for a more harmonious future.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

📹 Related Video: PLATO ON: The Allegory of the Cave

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Great Books Western World Politics War Peace""

📹 Related Video: PLATO ON: The Allegory of the Cave