The Enduring Riddle: Navigating the Philosophical Problem of Change and Becoming

From the moment we open our eyes, we are confronted with a world in constant flux. Seasons turn, bodies age, ideas evolve, and even the mountains erode over eons. Yet, beneath this relentless tide of transformation, there's an intuitive sense that something endures, that there's a fundamental being that persists. This tension between the ephemeral and the eternal, between change and being, lies at the very heart of philosophy and constitutes one of its most profound and persistent problems: the philosophical problem of change and becoming.

This article delves into how thinkers throughout the history of philosophy, particularly those immortalized in the Great Books of the Western World, have grappled with this fundamental enigma, attempting to reconcile the undeniable reality of change with the equally compelling notion of stable being. How can something be and yet become something else? What does this imply about the nature of reality, our identity, and the very fabric of time itself?

The Ancient Clash: Heraclitus' Flux vs. Parmenides' Immutable Being

The earliest and perhaps most dramatic articulation of this problem emerged in pre-Socratic Greece. Two towering figures, Heraclitus and Parmenides, laid down opposing foundational stones for Western metaphysics.

Heraclitus: The Philosopher of Flux

Heraclitus of Ephesus, often called "the weeping philosopher" for his melancholic view of the world, famously declared, "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it is not the same river and he is not the same man." This powerful metaphor encapsulates his core belief: that the fundamental nature of reality is change itself. Everything is in a state of perpetual becoming, a constant flow (panta rhei). For Heraclitus, stability is an illusion; the only constant is change. He saw the world as a dynamic tension of opposites, constantly warring and resolving, driving the ceaseless motion of existence.

Parmenides: The Philosopher of Unchanging Being

In stark contrast, Parmenides of Elea presented a radical argument that denied the very possibility of change. For Parmenides, Being is one, eternal, indivisible, and unchanging. To be means to exist, and to not be is simply impossible. Therefore, for something to change would imply that it moves from being to not being (or vice versa), which is logically incoherent. Change, motion, and plurality are, in his view, mere sensory illusions. Reality, as grasped by reason, is a static, perfect, and unified Being.

The chasm between these two perspectives created a profound challenge for subsequent philosophers:

Aspect Heraclitus' View (Flux) Parmenides' View (Being)
Reality Constant change, becoming, dynamic tension Unchanging, eternal, unified Being
Knowledge Through senses, acknowledging change and impermanence Through reason, rejecting sensory illusions of change
Core Idea Panta rhei (everything flows) Being is, non-being is not
Implication No stable identity, only process No change, no motion, only static existence

(Image: A stylized depiction of two ancient Greek philosophers facing each other across a swirling river, one pointing to the river's flow, the other gesturing towards a solid, unmoving rock formation in the background, symbolizing their opposing views on change and being.)

Plato's Synthesis: Forms, Being, and Becoming

Plato, deeply influenced by both Heraclitus and Parmenides, sought to reconcile their seemingly irreconcilable positions. In his Theory of Forms, as explored in dialogues like The Republic and Phaedo, Plato posited two distinct realms of existence:

  1. The World of Forms (Being): This is a realm of perfect, eternal, unchanging, and intelligible Forms (e.g., the Form of Justice, the Form of Beauty, the Form of a Circle). These Forms are the true Being—they are what truly is. They are apprehended by reason and represent perfect stability, echoing Parmenides.
  2. The Sensible World (Becoming): This is the world we perceive with our senses, a world of imperfect, transient, and changing particulars. Individual beautiful objects, just acts, or circles in the sand are mere reflections or copies of the perfect Forms. This realm is characterized by change and becoming, mirroring Heraclitus' observations.

For Plato, change occurs in the sensible world as particulars strive to embody, however imperfectly, their corresponding Forms. Thus, Being (the Forms) provides the stable blueprint, while Becoming (the sensible world) is the dynamic process of approximating that blueprint. The problem of change is explained by the imperfect participation of particulars in perfect Forms.

Aristotle's Empirical Approach: Potentiality and Actuality

Aristotle, Plato's most famous student, offered a more immanent and empirical solution to the problem of change, moving away from Plato's transcendent Forms. In his Metaphysics and Physics, Aristotle introduced the concepts of potentiality (dynamis) and actuality (energeia).

For Aristotle, change is not an illusion, nor is it merely participation in a separate realm. Instead, change is the actualization of a potentiality. A seed has the potentiality to become a tree; a block of marble has the potentiality to become a statue. Change is the process by which something moves from a state of potentiality to a state of actuality.

This framework allows for both being and becoming within the same entity:

  • Substantial Being: An object retains its fundamental identity (its "substance") even as its accidental properties change. The seed remains a seed, even as it becomes a sprout.
  • Process of Becoming: The change is understood as a natural unfolding of inherent potentials.

Aristotle also connected change intimately with time. He argued that time is "the number of motion with respect to 'before' and 'after'". In other words, time is the measure of change. Without change, there would be no time, as there would be no succession of events to measure. This grounds time in the physical processes of the world, rather than seeing it as an independent entity.

The Enduring Legacy: Medieval and Modern Reflections

The problem of change and being continued to resonate throughout subsequent philosophical epochs.

  • Medieval Philosophy: Thinkers like St. Augustine, in his Confessions, grappled with the nature of time itself, asking what time is before there was a created world, and concluding that time is a feature of creation, intimately linked to the change and succession of events within it. Thomas Aquinas further developed Aristotle's concepts of potentiality and actuality to explain motion and the existence of God as the "Unmoved Mover."
  • Modern Philosophy: The problem re-emerged in debates about personal identity over time (e.g., John Locke's psychological continuity), the nature of causality (David Hume), and the very structure of our experience of time and space (Immanuel Kant). Each of these inquiries, in some way, harks back to the fundamental tension between what endures and what transforms.

Why Does This Matter?

Understanding the philosophical problem of change and becoming is not merely an academic exercise. It helps us:

  • Understand Reality: How do we categorize and comprehend a world that is both stable and dynamic?
  • Define Identity: What makes us the "same person" over a lifetime of constant physical and psychological change?
  • Grasp Time: What is time? Is it an objective reality, or a human construct for measuring change?
  • Navigate Existence: How do we find meaning and stability in a universe characterized by perpetual change and ultimately, impermanence?

The question of how things are and how they become continues to be a fertile ground for philosophical inquiry, reminding us that the most fundamental observations about our world often lead to the deepest and most enduring puzzles in philosophy.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Heraclitus vs Parmenides - The Problem of Change Explained"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotle's Metaphysics: Understanding Potentiality and Actuality"

Share this post