The Enduring Riddle: Navigating the Philosophical Problem of Change and Becoming

The world, as we experience it, is in constant flux. From the turning of the seasons to the growth and decay of living things, change is an undeniable aspect of existence. Yet, beneath this dynamic surface lies one of Philosophy's most profound and persistent problems: how can something change and still remain itself? This isn't merely an academic exercise; it strikes at the very heart of how we understand Being, identity, and the nature of reality itself, a question pondered by the greatest minds across the ages, whose thoughts are preserved within the Great Books of the Western World.

The Ancient Paradox: Flux vs. Permanence

The philosophical problem of change finds its roots in the earliest inquiries into the nature of reality. The pre-Socratic thinkers grappled with a fundamental tension: Is reality fundamentally characterized by constant motion, or by an unchanging, static essence?

  • Heraclitus of Ephesus (c. 535 – c. 475 BC): The River of Flux
    Heraclitus famously declared, "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man." For Heraclitus, Change was the only constant. Everything is in a state of Becoming, a perpetual flow governed by a cosmic logos or reason, but ultimately defined by its impermanence. The essence of things lay in their continuous transformation. To deny change was to deny reality.

  • Parmenides of Elea (c. 515 – c. 450 BC): The Immutable Being
    In stark contrast, Parmenides argued that true Being must be eternal, indivisible, and utterly unchanging. For him, change was an illusion, a deception of the senses. If something changes, it must either come from non-being (which is impossible, as non-being is nothing) or become non-being (also impossible). Therefore, Being simply is, and any notion of Becoming or movement is logically incoherent. His poem, "On Nature," presents a rigorous argument for a single, undifferentiated reality.

This foundational disagreement set the stage for millennia of philosophical debate. How can we reconcile the undeniable evidence of our senses (change) with the logical demands for a stable, identifiable reality (being)?

(Image: A detailed classical Greek marble bust of Heraclitus with a furrowed brow, looking intensely, positioned against a background of swirling, dynamic brushstrokes suggesting a river or flowing water, contrasting with a section of solid, unyielding stone on the other side, symbolizing the tension between flux and permanence.)

Plato's Forms and Aristotle's Solutions

The giants of classical Greek Philosophy, Plato and Aristotle, each offered sophisticated frameworks to address this enduring problem.

Plato's Realm of Forms

Plato, heavily influenced by Parmenides' insistence on unchanging truth, proposed his theory of Forms. For Plato, the changing world we perceive with our senses is merely a shadow or imperfect copy of an eternal, immutable realm of perfect Forms. A beautiful object changes, but the Form of Beauty itself does not. A just act changes, but the Form of Justice remains constant. Being, in its truest sense, resides in these transcendent Forms, while the physical world is characterized by Becoming – a constant striving to imitate these perfect archetypes.

Aristotle's Potentiality and Actuality

Aristotle, Plato's student, offered a more immanent solution, seeking to explain change within the natural world itself rather than relegating true reality to another realm. He introduced the crucial concepts of potentiality (δύναμις, dynamis) and actuality (ἐνέργεια, energeia).

Aristotle's Four Causes of Change:

  1. Material Cause: That out of which something comes to be (e.g., bronze of a statue).
  2. Formal Cause: The form or essence of a thing (e.g., the shape of the statue).
  3. Efficient Cause: The primary source of the change or rest (e.g., the sculptor).
  4. Final Cause: The end, the purpose for which a thing is done (e.g., the statue's purpose).

For Aristotle, Change is the transition from potentiality to actuality. A seed has the potentiality to become a tree; a block of marble has the potentiality to become a statue. The process of Becoming is the actualization of these inherent potentials. This framework allowed Aristotle to explain how a thing can change (actualize its potential) while still retaining its identity (its underlying substance or form). The tree is the actualized seed; the statue is the actualized marble in a specific form.

The Interplay of Change and Time

The problem of change is inextricably linked to the concept of Time. If everything is changing, how do we mark the passage of time? And conversely, does time itself cause change, or is it merely a measure of it?

  • Augustine of Hippo: In his Confessions, Augustine famously wrestled with the nature of Time, concluding that while we experience past, present, and future, Time itself is a "distension of the soul." It is our subjective experience and memory that gives form to the flow of events, rather than time being an external, objective container for change.
  • Modern Physics and Philosophy of Time: Contemporary Philosophy and physics continue to grapple with whether Time is a fundamental dimension (like space) in which events occur, or an emergent property of the universe, a consequence of the thermodynamic arrow of time, or even a human construct for ordering our perceptions of change.

The very act of perceiving change implies a before and an after, a sequence that requires a temporal framework. Yet, if Time is merely the measure of change, and change is fundamental, then the relationship becomes circular, deepening the philosophical conundrum.

Enduring Questions and Modern Echoes

The problem of change and becoming didn't end with the Greeks. It has continued to challenge philosophers, scientists, and theologians alike, prompting new perspectives and further questions:

  • How do we define identity over time? (e.g., The Ship of Theseus paradox).
  • Is there an unchanging "self" or "soul" that persists through personal change?
  • What is the relationship between physical change and mental states?
  • Does the universe have a static, underlying structure, or is it fundamentally process-oriented?

From David Hume's skepticism about causality to Immanuel Kant's transcendental idealism, which posited Time and Change as fundamental categories of human understanding, to contemporary process philosophies that prioritize Becoming over Being, the debate rages on. The question of how things persist through alteration remains a fertile ground for philosophical inquiry, reminding us that the most obvious aspects of our reality can often be the most perplexing.

YouTube: "Zeno's Paradoxes explained"
YouTube: "Philosophy of Time and Change: Crash Course Philosophy"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Philosophical Problem of Change and Becoming philosophy"

Share this post