The Nature of The Concept of Being in Relation to Quality

The Fabric of Existence: Unpacking Being and Quality in Metaphysics

The philosophical journey often begins with the most fundamental questions: What is existence? and What makes something what it is? These inquiries lead us directly into the heart of Metaphysics, specifically concerning the concept of Being in relation to Quality. At its core, this article explores how the sheer fact of existence intertwines with the attributes and characteristics that define and differentiate everything around us. We'll delve into the foundational ideas from the Great Books of the Western World to understand this intricate dance, revealing how Quality is not merely an adornment of Being, but often integral to its very comprehension and articulation.

Unveiling Being: The Cornerstone of All Inquiry

To speak of Being is to confront the most fundamental aspect of reality: that something exists at all. It's the simple, yet profound, affirmation that is. Philosophers throughout history, from Parmenides' stark declaration that "Being is, and Non-Being is not" to Aristotle's meticulous categorization, have grappled with this concept.

Parmenides' Monism: For Parmenides, Being is singular, eternal, unchanging, and undifferentiated. Any notion of Quality or change would imply non-being, which he deemed unthinkable. This radical view emphasizes Being as an absolute, prior to any specific attributes.
Aristotle's Categories: In contrast, Aristotle, in his Categories (a cornerstone text in the Great Books), approached Being through its various modes. While substance (e.g., a man, a horse) is the primary form of Being—that which exists independently—he also identified nine other categories, one of which is Quality. This immediately posits a relation where Quality describes Being, but is distinct from it. A substance is, and then it has qualities.

The concept of Being itself is often elusive because it is so pervasive. It's the canvas upon which all other distinctions are painted.

The Nature of Quality: Describing What Is

If Being is the "that it is," then Quality addresses the "what it is like." A Quality is an attribute, property, or characteristic that helps define or differentiate a Being. It answers questions such as: What color is it? How large is it? What is its inherent nature or disposition?

Aristotle's treatment of Quality is particularly illuminating. He identifies several types of qualities:

Habits and Dispositions: Knowledge, virtue, health (e.g., being knowledgeable, being just).
Capacities or Incapacities: Ability to run, inability to see (e.g., being swift, being blind).
Affective Qualities and Affections: Sweetness, bitterness, heat, cold, redness (e.g., being sweet, being red).
Figure and Form: Straightness, curvedness, shape (e.g., being round, being square).

These qualities are not merely superficial; they often penetrate to the very essence of what a Being is. A virtuous person is virtuous; their virtue isn't an external accessory but an intrinsic part of their moral Being.

The Intricate Relation: How Being and Quality Intersect

The true philosophical challenge lies in understanding the relation between Being and Quality. Can something be without any qualities? Or do qualities constitute Being itself?

Accidental vs. Essential Qualities: Aristotle distinguished between accidental qualities (those a Being can lose without ceasing to be itself, like a man's hair color) and essential qualities (those without which a Being would cease to be what it is, like a man's rationality). This distinction highlights that some qualities are more deeply intertwined with Being than others.
Plato's Forms: For Plato, as explored in dialogues like the Phaedo and Republic, ultimate Being resides in the Forms—perfect, eternal, unchanging essences (ideal Qualities) such as "the Good," "Beauty itself," or "Justice itself." Particular things in the sensible world participate in these Forms, thereby acquiring their Being and Qualities. Here, Quality (in its ideal form) seems to precede and even confer Being upon particulars.
Existence and Essence: Later philosophers, notably Thomas Aquinas (drawing heavily on Aristotle and found in the Summa Theologica), posited a distinction between existence (that a thing is) and essence (what a thing is). Essence is often understood as the collection of essential Qualities. The relation here is critical: a Being must first exist (have Being) before its essence (its defining Qualities) can be fully realized or apprehended. Yet, without an essence, what kind of Being would it be?

(Image: A detailed illustration depicting a complex, interwoven tapestry. In the background, a luminous, undifferentiated light represents "Being." Threads of various colors, textures, and patterns emerge from and crisscross this light, forming distinct shapes and figures, symbolizing "Qualities." The threads are not merely laid on top but appear to be integral to the fabric itself, illustrating the deep interconnection and mutual constitution of Being and Quality.)

Diverse Philosophical Perspectives on the Being-Quality Relation

The Great Books of the Western World offer a spectrum of views on this profound relation, each contributing to our understanding of Metaphysics.

Philosopher/Tradition	Primary View on Being-Quality Relation	Key Concepts
Parmenides	`Being` is undifferentiated; `Qualities` are illusory.	Monism, unchanging `Being`
Plato	`Qualities` (Forms) are the ultimate `Being`; particulars participate in them.	Forms, participation, ideal `Qualities`
Aristotle	`Substance` is primary `Being`; `Qualities` are attributes (accidental or essential).	Categories, substance, accident, essence
Thomas Aquinas	`Being` (existence) is distinct from `Quality` (essence), but inseparable in created things.	Essence and Existence, act and potency
John Locke	`Qualities` are either primary (inherent in objects) or secondary (mind-dependent). `Substance` is an unknown substratum holding qualities.	Primary/Secondary Qualities, substratum
David Hume	Skepticism about underlying `substance`; we only perceive bundles of `Qualities`.	Impressions, ideas, skepticism
Immanuel Kant	`Qualities` are perceived through categories of understanding, shaping our experience of `Being`.	Categories of Understanding, phenomena

This table underscores that the relation between Being and Quality is far from simple. It shifts depending on whether one prioritizes the universal or the particular, the abstract or the empirical, the mind or the external world.

Conclusion: The Enduring Inquiry

The relation between Being and Quality is a central, enduring puzzle in Metaphysics. From the ancient Greeks who sought to understand the fundamental nature of reality, through medieval scholasticism grappling with divine Being, to modern empiricists and idealists questioning the very possibility of knowing Being independent of its Qualities, this inquiry continues to shape our philosophical landscape.

Ultimately, Quality is not merely a description tacked onto Being; it is often how Being manifests, differentiates, and makes itself intelligible to us. To strip a Being of all its Qualities might lead to an unimaginable void, a Being without definition, without character, perhaps even without identity. The profound lesson from the Great Books is that Being and Quality are inextricably linked, each illuminating the other in our relentless pursuit of understanding what it means to be.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Aristotle Metaphysics Categories Substance Quality"