The Inseparable Dance: Exploring the Concept of Being in Relation to Quality

Summary: At the very heart of metaphysics lies a profound and often perplexing question: What does it mean to be? This article delves into the intricate relation between Being and Quality, arguing that these two fundamental concepts are not merely adjacent but deeply interdependent. From the ancient Greeks to modern thought, philosophers have grappled with how the essence of existence (Being) manifests through, and is understood by, its inherent characteristics (Qualities). We will explore how understanding this dynamic relation is crucial for comprehending the very fabric of reality as presented in the Great Books of the Western World.


The Foundations: Defining Being and Quality

To embark on this philosophical journey, we must first establish a working understanding of our core terms.

  • Being: In its most expansive sense, Being refers to existence itself – that which is. It is the fundamental reality underlying all things, the sheer fact of "to be." Philosophers have debated whether Being is a univocal concept (meaning the same thing for everything that exists) or an analogical one (meaning different things in different contexts). From Parmenides' assertion that "what is, is, and what is not, is not," to Heidegger's exploration of Dasein, the quest to define Being has been a relentless pursuit in metaphysics.

  • Quality: Quality, conversely, refers to the characteristics, attributes, or properties that describe Being. It's how something is. Is it red or blue? Hot or cold? Large or small? Virtuous or vicious? These are all qualities that provide specificity to an otherwise undifferentiated notion of existence. Aristotle, in his Categories, identifies Quality as one of the fundamental ways in which things can be predicated of a subject, distinguishing it from quantity, substance, relation, and so forth.

The relation between these two is not incidental; it is foundational. Can we conceive of Being without any qualities? And can qualities exist without something that is to possess them?


A Historical Perspective: Tracing the Relation Through the Great Books

The philosophical tradition, particularly as illuminated by the Great Books of the Western World, offers rich insights into the evolving understanding of this relation.

Plato's Realm of Forms: Quality as Participation

Plato, in works like The Republic and Phaedo, introduced the concept of immutable Forms as the ultimate Being. For Plato, true Being resided in the perfect, eternal Forms (e.g., the Form of Beauty, the Form of Justice). The physical world, with its constantly changing qualities, merely participates in these Forms. A beautiful object in our world is beautiful because it partakes in the Form of Beauty. Here, qualities are not inherent to the object's Being but rather reflections or imperfect copies of a higher, more real Being.

Aristotle's Categories: Substance and Accidents

Aristotle, Plato's student, offered a more grounded approach in his Metaphysics and Categories. He posited that primary Being is substance – the individual, concrete thing (e.g., this man, this horse). Qualities, for Aristotle, are accidents that inhere in a substance. They are ways in which a substance can be described, but they do not constitute its fundamental Being. A man's quality of being tall or wise does not make him be a man; rather, his Being as a man allows him to possess such qualities.

Aristotle's schema provides a powerful framework:

Category Description Example of Being & Quality Relation
Substance That which exists in itself; primary Being. This tree (Being)
Quality The characteristic or attribute of a substance. Green, tall, rough (Qualities of the tree)
Quantity How much of something there is. Ten feet high (Quantity of the tree)
Relation How one substance stands in relation to another. Taller than the bush (Relation of the tree)
Action/Passion Doing or undergoing something. Growing, being pruned (Actions/Passions of the tree)

This table highlights how Quality is one specific way of articulating the characteristics of a substance's Being.

Medieval and Modern Perspectives

Later thinkers like St. Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotelian concepts into Christian theology, emphasizing God as pure Being whose qualities are perfect and identical with His essence. In the modern era, philosophers like John Locke distinguished between primary qualities (inherent in the object, like extension, motion) and secondary qualities (mind-dependent, like color, taste), further complicating the relation between objective Being and our subjective experience of its qualities. Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason, argued that qualities are not just "out there" but are structured by the categories of our understanding, meaning our minds actively shape how we perceive the qualities of Being.


The Interdependence: Why Quality Matters to Being

It is tempting to think of Being as primary and Quality as secondary, merely descriptive. However, a deeper examination reveals their profound interdependence.

  1. Being without Qualities is Incomprehensible: If something simply is but has no characteristics – no shape, no color, no size, no function, no essence – can we truly grasp it? Such a Being would be an undifferentiated void, indistinguishable from non-existence. It is through its qualities that Being manifests itself to us and becomes intelligible.
  2. Qualities Pre-suppose Being: Conversely, a quality cannot exist in a vacuum. "Redness" does not float independently; it is the quality of a red apple, a red car, or a red sunset. Qualities are always the qualities of something that is. They require a subject, a substance, a Being in which to inhere or to which they can be attributed.
  3. The Dynamic Relation: This isn't a static connection but a dynamic relation. The qualities an entity possesses define its particular mode of Being. A human being is defined by qualities like rationality, morality, and sociality. A rock's Being is understood through its qualities of hardness, mass, and inertia. Change in qualities can even imply a change in Being (e.g., a caterpillar's qualities transforming into a butterfly's, suggesting a new mode of Being).

(Image: A detailed illustration depicting a classical Greek philosopher, perhaps Aristotle, pointing towards a collection of diverse objects – a geometric solid, a plant, a human figure, and an abstract representation of light. From each object, intricate, glowing lines emanate, connecting back to a central, luminous, yet undefined sphere labeled "Being." The lines themselves are textured with various patterns and colors, symbolizing "Qualities," demonstrating how specific attributes flow from and define individual existences, all ultimately linked to the overarching concept of Being.)


Metaphysical Implications: Shaping Reality

The relation between Being and Quality is not just an academic exercise; it profoundly impacts our understanding of reality itself.

  • Identity and Individuation: How do we distinguish one Being from another? Primarily through their unique combination of qualities. My Being as Daniel Fletcher is distinct from your Being because of our different physical, intellectual, and moral qualities.
  • Change and Persistence: When something changes, do its qualities change while its Being remains the same (e.g., a person aging)? Or does a radical change in qualities signify a change in Being altogether (e.g., a tree becoming ash)? This question drives much of the philosophy of identity and persistence.
  • Truth and Knowledge: Our knowledge of Being is mediated through our perception and understanding of its qualities. The truth about something often lies in accurately identifying and describing its essential qualities.

Conclusion: The Enduring Philosophical Significance

The concept of Being in relation to Quality remains a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry, woven throughout the Great Books of the Western World. From Plato's Forms to Aristotle's Categories, and through the complex analyses of modern thinkers, the consensus emerges: Being and Quality are inextricably linked. We cannot fully grasp what is without understanding how it is, and we cannot speak of qualities without acknowledging the underlying reality that possesses them. This dynamic interplay illuminates not only the nature of existence but also the very structure of our thought and language about reality. To ponder this relation is to engage with the deepest questions of metaphysics, continually refining our perception of the world and our place within it.


YouTube Video Suggestions:

  1. YouTube: Aristotle Categories explained philosophy
  2. YouTube: Plato Theory of Forms and Metaphysics

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "The Concept of Being in Relation to Quality philosophy"

Share this post