Our daily lives are a complex tapestry woven from countless choices, each one a testament to the intricate dance between what we want and what we choose to do. This article delves into the profound philosophical relationship between desire and will, exploring how these fundamental facets of the mind shape the decisions that define the man. Drawing from the enduring wisdom of the Great Books of the Western World, we uncover the historical and contemporary perspectives on this dynamic tension, revealing how understanding this interplay is crucial for comprehending human agency and moral responsibility.

Introduction: The Eternal Tug-of-War Within

From the simplest impulse to the most profound moral dilemma, human existence is characterized by an internal negotiation: the pull of desire versus the guiding hand of will. This isn't merely a psychological phenomenon but a foundational philosophical problem, debated and dissected by thinkers across millennia. Is man a slave to his passions, or is he endowed with a rational faculty capable of overriding his deepest urges? The Great Books of the Western World provide a rich lineage of inquiry into this very question, offering diverse perspectives on how these two powerful forces within the mind converge, diverge, and ultimately shape our choices. Understanding this intricate relationship is not just an academic exercise; it's a journey into the very essence of what it means to be human, to act, and to be responsible for those actions.

The Alluring Force of Desire

Desire, in its myriad forms, is the engine of much human activity. It can be a primal urge for sustenance, a yearning for love, an ambition for power, or a quest for knowledge. Philosophers from Plato to Spinoza have grappled with its nature.

  • Plato's Chariot Allegory: In the Phaedrus, Plato famously describes the soul as a charioteer (reason) guiding two winged horses: one noble and spirited (will/thymos) and the other unruly and driven by appetite (desire/epithymia). Here, desire is presented as a powerful, often irrational force that needs to be managed.
  • Aristotle's Appetites: Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, distinguished between rational and irrational parts of the soul. Desires fall largely into the irrational, appetitive part, yet he acknowledged that they can be "obedient" to reason, suggesting a potential for harmony rather than perpetual conflict.
  • Augustine's Love and Longing: For Augustine, desire (specifically, disordered love) is central to the human condition after the Fall. Our hearts are restless until they rest in God, indicating a deep-seated spiritual desire that misdirected can lead to sin, but rightly ordered, leads to ultimate fulfillment.
  • Spinoza's Conatus: Baruch Spinoza, in his Ethics, posited conatus – the inherent striving of every being to persevere in its own being. Desire, for Spinoza, is this very conatus insofar as we are conscious of it. It's a fundamental, deterministic force, not necessarily something to be overcome but understood as part of nature.

The Guiding Hand of Will

If desire pulls us, will is often seen as the faculty that allows us to direct, restrain, or even cultivate those pulls. It represents our capacity for deliberate action, self-control, and moral choice.

  • Augustine's Free Will: Augustine profoundly explored the concept of free will. For him, the will is the very faculty that allows us to choose between good and evil. It is the seat of moral responsibility, and its misuse leads to sin. This emphasis on the will's independence was revolutionary.
  • Aquinas's Rational Appetite: Thomas Aquinas, synthesizing Aristotle and Augustine, viewed will as a "rational appetite." It's not distinct from reason but is the intellect's movement towards a good apprehended by reason. The will chooses the means to achieve an end determined by reason.
  • Descartes's Infinite Will: René Descartes, in his Meditations, considered the will to be vast and infinite, often exceeding the finite scope of the intellect. This disparity, he argued, is the source of error – when the will assents to ideas that the intellect has not yet clearly and distinctly perceived.
  • Kant's Good Will: Immanuel Kant placed the good will at the absolute center of morality. For Kant, an action is truly moral not because of its consequences or the desires it fulfills, but because it is done from duty, out of respect for the moral law, driven by a will that acts autonomously and rationally.

The Mind as the Arena: The Dynamic Tension

The mind is the crucible where desire and will meet, interact, and often clash. This internal struggle is a defining characteristic of the human experience, and how we navigate it determines our character and our choices.

  • Akrasia (Weakness of Will): A recurring theme in philosophy, particularly from Aristotle onward, is akrasia – the phenomenon of knowing what is good or right to do, yet acting against that knowledge due to the overwhelming force of desire. This highlights a perceived failure of the will to assert its authority over appetites.
  • The Struggle for Self-Mastery: Many ancient philosophers, particularly the Stoics, emphasized the importance of self-mastery, training the will to align with reason and virtue, thereby resisting the irrational impulses of desire. This isn't about eradicating desire but controlling one's response to it.
  • The Integration of Faculties: Modern psychology, though not directly from the Great Books, often echoes these ancient insights, viewing the mind as a system where various faculties (emotions, cognitions, motivations) must be integrated for healthy functioning. The philosophical quest is to understand how this integration should occur.

(Image: A classical oil painting depicting a Roman charioteer, possibly Phaedrus's allegory. The charioteer, with a focused and determined expression, firmly grips the reins, guiding two horses. One horse appears spirited and strong, perhaps with a noble bearing, while the other is more wild-eyed, straining, and seemingly difficult to control, its mane dishevelled. The background could be a dramatic, cloudy sky, symbolizing internal turmoil or the challenging path of life. The lighting highlights the tension in the charioteer's arms and the horses' powerful movements, visually representing the struggle between reason/will and untamed desire.)

Implications for the Man: Agency and Responsibility

The interplay of desire and will has profound implications for understanding human agency, moral responsibility, and the very nature of the man.

  • Freedom and Determinism: If desire is a deterministic force (as Spinoza might suggest), how much freedom does the will truly possess? Conversely, if the will is truly free (as Augustine and Kant argued), how does it contend with the powerful influence of our desires? This tension lies at the heart of the free will debate.
  • Moral Virtue: For many philosophers, particularly Aristotle, moral virtue is cultivated precisely through the disciplined exercise of the will in shaping and moderating our desires. A virtuous man is not one devoid of desires, but one whose desires are in harmony with reason, guided by a strong will.
  • Self-Knowledge: Understanding the sources of our desires and the strength (or weakness) of our will is a cornerstone of self-knowledge. This introspection, encouraged by Socrates and echoed through centuries of philosophy, empowers the man to make more deliberate and meaningful choices.

Key Perspectives on Desire and Will

Philosopher/Era View on Desire View on Will Relationship in Choice
Plato Powerful, often irrational appetite Reason's capacity to guide/control Will (reason) must master desire
Aristotle Appetites, can be rational or irrational Rational appetite, chooses means to rational ends Will can guide and harmonize desires
Augustine Fundamentally good but prone to disorder Free, responsible for moral choice, can choose evil Will directs desire towards God or away from Him
Aquinas Natural inclination towards perceived good Rational appetite, follows intellect's judgment Will executes reason's judgment regarding desires
Descartes Passions of the soul, distinct from thought Infinite, capable of assent or dissent Will can assent to clear ideas, or err when assenting to unclear desires
Kant Heteronomous, not a basis for morality Autonomous, acts from duty, seat of moral law Will must overcome desire to act morally
Spinoza Conatus, fundamental striving to persevere Conscious manifestation of conatus, not truly free Desire is the essence; will is consciousness of it

Further Exploration

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Plato's Chariot Allegory explained""

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: ""Kant's Good Will and Duty""

Conclusion: The Ongoing Human Project

The philosophical exploration of desire and will reveals not a simple dichotomy, but a profound and multifaceted relationship at the core of human agency. From the ancient Greeks who saw the mind as a battleground, to the medieval theologians who wrestled with free will, to the Enlightenment thinkers who sought rational control, the man has consistently confronted this internal dynamic. Our choices, both grand and trivial, are the outward manifestation of this inner interplay. To understand this ongoing negotiation between what we instinctively crave and what we consciously choose is to gain deeper insight into ourselves, our moral landscape, and the enduring human project of self-governance and meaningful action. The Great Books of the Western World remind us that this conversation is far from over, inviting each of us to reflect on the forces that truly guide our lives.

Share this post