The Internal Dialectic: Navigating Choice Through Desire and Will

The human experience is perpetually shaped by the intricate dance between what we want and what we choose to do. This article explores the profound interplay of desire and will within the mind of Man, revealing how these fundamental forces, often in tension, ultimately forge our decisions. Drawing from the rich tapestry of Western philosophical thought, we will unpack their definitions, delineate their dynamic relationship, and understand how reason attempts to mediate this internal drama to guide our actions and define our very being.

The Appetitive Pull: Understanding Desire

Desire is often understood as an inclination, a longing, or an appetite directed towards an object or state of affairs perceived as good or pleasurable. It is the engine of our being, the initial spark that propels us towards action. Philosophers throughout history have grappled with its nature:

  • Plato, in his Republic, famously divided the soul into three parts: the rational, the spirited, and the appetitive. Desire, or epithymia, is rooted in this appetitive part, seeking gratification of bodily needs and pleasures. It is the unthinking urge for food, drink, sex, and material wealth.
  • Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics, delves into different types of desire, distinguishing between rational and non-rational appetites. While some desires are impulsive and shared with animals, others, like wishing, are rational and directed by reason towards a perceived good. He notes that desire, in its broader sense, is a movement towards something pleasant or away from something painful.
  • Augustine of Hippo, in his Confessions, vividly describes the powerful, often overwhelming pull of earthly desires and concupiscence, portraying a constant struggle between the soul's longing for God and the seductive allure of worldly pleasures. His work highlights desire as a force that can both uplift and corrupt, depending on its object and the direction of the will.

Desire, in essence, represents the pull – the inherent attraction or aversion that arises within us, often prior to conscious deliberation. It is the "want."

The Guiding Hand: The Nature of Will

If desire is the pull, will is the push – the faculty of the mind that enables conscious choice and deliberate action. It is the power to direct one's own actions, to assent or dissent, to initiate or inhibit. The concept of will, particularly free will, has been a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry, shaping our understanding of moral responsibility and human agency.

  • Augustine is a pivotal figure in the development of the concept of will. For him, the will is not merely an appetite but a distinct power of the soul, capable of choosing between good and evil. His exploration of free will in relation to divine grace profoundly influenced subsequent Western thought. He saw the will as the central faculty for moral action.
  • Thomas Aquinas, building on Aristotelian foundations in his Summa Theologica, articulated the will as a "rational appetite." For Aquinas, the intellect first apprehends a good, and then the will, moved by this apprehension, chooses to pursue it. The will is free in that it can choose among various perceived goods, or even choose not to act, but it is always directed towards what it perceives as good.
  • René Descartes, in his Meditations, emphasized the infinite nature of the will, contrasting it with the finite intellect. He posited that our errors arise not from a faulty intellect, but from the will's tendency to assent to ideas that the intellect has not yet fully clarified. This highlights the will's power to affirm or deny, even beyond the clear perception of truth.
  • Immanuel Kant, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, elevates the concept of the "good will" as the only thing unconditionally good. For Kant, the will's autonomy – its capacity to be a law unto itself, acting from duty and according to universalizable maxims – is the basis of morality. The will is not merely about choosing what we want, but about choosing what is right.

Will, therefore, embodies the push – the faculty of self-determination, the capacity for deliberate choice and moral action. It is the "choose."

The Dynamic Tension: Desire and Will in Conflict and Harmony

The relationship between desire and will is rarely straightforward; it is a complex interplay of forces that can lead to internal conflict or harmonious cooperation.

Table 1: Desire vs. Will – Key Distinctions

Feature Desire Will
Nature An inclination, longing, appetite A faculty of conscious choice and action
Origin Often non-rational, emotional, bodily Rational, deliberate, self-determining
Direction Towards a perceived good or pleasure Towards a chosen end, often moral or rational
Experience "I want..." "I choose to..." / "I ought to..."
Primary Role Motivation, initial impulse Deliberation, decision, execution

Often, our desires present us with a myriad of options, some immediate and pleasurable, others long-term and challenging. The will then steps in, guided by the mind's reason, to navigate these desires.

  • A Man might desire a decadent dessert, but his will, informed by his long-term health goals, chooses a healthier option.
  • A student might desire to spend an evening socializing, but their will, prioritizing academic success, chooses to study.

This tension is where Man's moral and rational agency truly manifests. The will is not merely a slave to desire; it has the power to resist, to redirect, and to choose against immediate gratification for a higher good or a rational principle. This capacity for self-mastery is a hallmark of human freedom.

(Image: A classical sculpture depicting a figure torn between two paths, one representing sensual pleasure and the other intellectual pursuit, with a third figure, perhaps representing reason or will, attempting to guide or mediate the internal struggle.)

The Mind as Mediator: Rational Choice

The mind, through its faculty of reason, plays a crucial mediating role in the interplay of desire and will. It is reason that allows us to:

  1. Evaluate Desires: To understand their origins, their potential consequences, and their alignment with our values and long-term goals.
  2. Deliberate Options: To weigh competing desires and potential courses of action. Aristotle's concept of phronesis (practical wisdom) is vital here, as it involves the ability to deliberate well about what is good and advantageous for oneself, not in a particular respect, but in general.
  3. Formulate Intentions: To translate evaluated desires and reasoned choices into concrete plans.
  4. Strengthen the Will: By providing clear reasons and justifications for certain choices, reason can empower the will to overcome strong, immediate desires that might be detrimental.

The ideal, as often envisioned in philosophy, is not the eradication of desire, but its proper ordering and governance by a rational will. A Man who is truly free is not one without desires, but one whose will is strong enough to choose according to his highest principles, rather than being swayed by every passing impulse.

Conclusion: The Architecture of Human Choice

The interplay of desire and will is the very architecture of human choice, a dynamic process orchestrated within the mind. Desire provides the raw material of motivation, the wants and yearnings that give life its vibrancy. Will, empowered by reason, provides the structure and direction, allowing Man to transcend mere impulse and act with purpose, integrity, and moral responsibility. Understanding this profound relationship, as illuminated by the foundational texts of Western thought, offers us deeper insights into our own decision-making processes and the eternal quest for self-mastery.

YouTube Video Suggestions:

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Plato Aristotle Will Desire Reason"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Augustine Kant Free Will Moral Choice"

Share this post