The Interplay of Desire and Will in Choice

Our lives are a continuous tapestry woven from choices, big and small. At the heart of every decision lies a dynamic, often tumultuous, interplay between two fundamental human faculties: desire and will. This article delves into how these powerful forces shape our actions, exploring their historical philosophical interpretations and the profound impact they have on the choices made by Man, ultimately mediated by the Mind. From ancient Greek thought to modern philosophy, understanding this intricate relationship is key to comprehending human agency and the pursuit of a well-lived life.

The Dual Forces Within Us: Desire and Will

For millennia, philosophers have grappled with the internal workings that drive human action. Ancient thinkers, particularly those whose wisdom fills the pages of the Great Books of the Western World, recognized the primal pull of our appetites and inclinations.

  • Desire: Often understood as the spontaneous inclination towards something perceived as good or pleasurable, or away from something perceived as bad or painful. In Plato's Republic, desire (ἐπιθυμία, epithymia) is represented by the unruly horse in the charioteer analogy, pulling us towards immediate gratification. Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, speaks of orexis (appetite or desire) as a principle of movement, often needing to be guided by reason. These are the passions, the urges, the natural leanings that emerge from our physical and emotional being. They are powerful motivators, often operating beneath the surface of conscious thought.

  • Will: While the concept of will as a distinct faculty evolved over time, particularly gaining prominence with figures like Augustine, it generally refers to the rational capacity for deliberate choice and action. It is the faculty by which the Mind assents to or dissents from a course of action, often in opposition to immediate desire. Augustine, in his Confessions, famously grapples with the struggle of his will to align with divine commands, highlighting its central role in moral responsibility. Later, figures like Immanuel Kant would elevate the will to the supreme faculty of moral action, driven by duty rather than inclination. The will is our capacity for self-control, for long-term planning, and for acting according to principles or reason.

These two forces, desire and will, are not always in harmony. Indeed, much of human experience, as documented throughout philosophy, is defined by their tension.

The Battleground of Choice: When Desire and Will Collide

The conflict between what we want and what we believe we should do is a universal human experience. This internal struggle is where the Mind truly becomes the arbiter of our choices.

(Image: A classical painting depicting Hercules at the Crossroads, showing him deliberating between two allegorical figures representing Virtue and Vice, symbolizing the profound moral choice between immediate pleasure and arduous duty.)

Philosophers have explored this conflict extensively:

  • Akrasia (Weakness of Will): Aristotle famously discussed akrasia, the phenomenon where an individual knows what is good or right but fails to act accordingly, succumbing to a stronger desire. This highlights a failure of the will to assert its authority over appetites.
  • Stoic Discipline: The Stoics, such as Epictetus in his Discourses, advocated for a rigorous discipline of the will, training the Mind to distinguish between what is within our control (our judgments, desires, and aversions) and what is not. They sought to align will with reason, thereby mastering disruptive desires.
  • Kantian Duty: Immanuel Kant, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, posits that truly moral actions are those performed purely out of duty, where the will acts from respect for the moral law, independent of any desire or inclination. For Kant, the will is the source of moral freedom, allowing Man to transcend mere animalistic urges.

The following table summarizes key philosophical perspectives on this dynamic:

Philosopher/School View on Desire View on Will Interplay in Choice
Plato Unruly, needs guidance Guided by reason Reason (Will) must control appetites (Desire)
Aristotle Natural, can be good or bad Rational, aims at good Practical reason shapes desires towards virtue
Augustine Can lead to sin Free, can choose good or evil Struggle for the will to choose good over sinful desires
Stoics External, to be suppressed Internal, to be strengthened Will masters desires through rational control
Kant Contingent, non-moral Autonomous, source of duty Will acts from duty, independent of desire
Spinoza Part of human nature, linked to striving Not distinct from desire; intellect guides Understanding affects desires, leading to freedom

Harmonizing the Self: Towards Integrated Choice

While conflict is a prominent theme, many philosophers also sought a path towards integration, where desire and will might work in concert rather than opposition. The goal is not always to eradicate desire, but to refine and direct it through the discerning Mind.

  • Virtuous Character: Aristotle's concept of practical wisdom (phronesis) suggests that through habituation and rational deliberation, a virtuous Man develops desires that are aligned with reason. Here, the will doesn't suppress desire as much as it educates it, leading to a state where one desires what is good and right.
  • Enlightened Self-Interest: Philosophers like Spinoza, in his Ethics, suggest that understanding the true causes of our desires through reason can lead us to more effective actions and a form of freedom. The Mind, by understanding its place in the causal chain, can guide desire towards what genuinely promotes well-being.
  • Self-Cultivation: The ongoing process of developing one's character involves strengthening the will to resist harmful desires and cultivating desires that align with one's values and long-term goals. This is a journey of self-mastery, where the Mind actively shapes the self.

Ultimately, the choices we make are a reflection of how effectively our Mind mediates between the immediate pull of desire and the guiding hand of will. It is through this continuous interplay that Man defines himself, striving for autonomy, virtue, and a life of purpose.

Conclusion: The Enduring Philosophical Question

The interplay of desire and will remains a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry, central to questions of ethics, freedom, and human nature. From the ancient Greeks observing the passions to modern neuroscientists exploring decision-making, the dynamic tension between what we want and what we choose to do continues to fascinate and challenge us. Understanding this intricate relationship is not merely an academic exercise; it is a vital tool for self-awareness, personal growth, and navigating the complex landscape of human choice. The Mind stands at the crossroads, constantly negotiating these powerful internal forces, shaping the destiny of every Man.

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Philosophy of Free Will and Determinism"

Video by: The School of Life

💡 Want different videos? Search YouTube for: "Ancient Greek Philosophy Desire Reason"

Share this post